Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

FIEM INDUSTRIES LTD v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD

31 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7005

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by three months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.

other other Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings

Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Mothers Pride Educational Personna Private Limited

31 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7178

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable resolution of disputes between the parties.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitral mandate Arbitral Tribunal

Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Scholar Tube Education and Learning Solutions Private Limited

31 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7177

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the conclusion of pending arbitration proceedings.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitral mandate Arbitral Tribunal

Mohit Jitendra Kukadia v. Union of India

30 Aug 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:6580

Delhi High Court held that minor procedural errors in scholarship applications should not bar deserving candidates from receiving benefits under the National Overseas Scholarship scheme and directed grant of scholarship to the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Overseas Scholarship traditional artisans hyper-technical approach income tax return

Telecare Network (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

30 Aug 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6685-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act on delayed refund of excess CVD paid due to mistake, rejecting limitation and duty characterization defenses.

tax petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 27A Countervailing Duty Refund of duty

Rakesh Kumar Ghei & Anr. v. State & Ors.

30 Aug 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:6557
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a 1994 Will, granted Letters of Administration to the petitioners, and rejected objections of undue influence and limitation, emphasizing the need to dispel real suspicious circumstances for probate.

property petition_allowed Significant Will execution Probate Letters of Administration Indian Succession Act, 1925

Gurupada Maji v. Enforcement Directorate

30 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:6564
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a PMLA case balancing the stringent statutory bail conditions with the fundamental right to liberty due to prolonged pre-trial detention and delay in trial commencement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail Article 21 Constitution of India

Sudhir Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

30 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6567

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against SBI officials for withholding title deeds, holding the bank's lien under Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act lawful and the dispute civil in nature.

criminal petition_allowed Significant general lien Section 171 Indian Contract Act title deeds criminal breach of trust

Preeti Chawla v. The State NCT of Delhi

30 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6625

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that bail depends on the quantity of narcotics actually seized and that mere use of the petitioner's premises by accused is insufficient to deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail commercial quantity Marijuana

Amit Singh Bakshi v. Harvinder Singh & Ors.

30 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6631

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for decree on admissions in a property dispute involving contested Wills, tenancy, and adverse possession, holding that disputed facts require trial.

civil other Will validity Executor of Will Possession suit Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Manuja Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

30 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6896

The Delhi High Court upheld pre-arrest bail granted to the accused in a forgery case, emphasizing that bail orders should not be disturbed without compelling reasons and that the merits of the case are to be decided at trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail cancellation of bail forgery relinquishment deed

Vandna Rani v. Indiamart Intermesh Ltd

30 Aug 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:7068

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing the challenge to employment termination, holding that disputes under Section 30 of the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954 are non-arbitrable and issues not pleaded cannot be raised at the award enforcement stage.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954 Section 30 Section 34

Raj Kumar v. Sushil Kumar

30 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:6566
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a cheque dishonour case, affirming that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 NI Act and the appellate court's interference with acquittal requires very substantial and compelling reasons.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Rebuttable presumption

Arjan Singh v. Gurbachan Singh & Ors.

30 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6940

The Delhi High Court held that a clause requiring co-owner consent before sale cannot be enforced as an absolute restriction on alienation and that entitlement to specific performance under such a clause requires trial and evidence.

civil other Significant Samjhauta Patra Specific Performance Clause 4 Right of Preemption

M/S PAMPAR OVENFRESH FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Aug 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMOHAN; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2024:DHC:6897-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding administrative recovery of grant-in-aid due to failure to meet Scheme timelines, affirming limited judicial review scope and procedural fairness in administrative decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review administrative decision natural justice grant-in-aid recovery

Maj. Gen. Sanjeev Jain (Retd.) v. Central Public Works Department & Anr.

30 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6857
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a tender condition requiring prior similar work experience for CPWD contractors, dismissing the writ petition challenging the clarification as neither arbitrary nor unreasonable.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender conditions CPWD Rules of Enlistment 2022 eligibility criteria similar works experience

Chasvinder Singh v. M/s Swiss Auto Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

30 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bahkru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6574-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining the registered proprietor from using the trademark SAP SWISS, holding that such relief requires prima facie evaluation and cannot be granted solely on an unexecuted family settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement interim injunction family settlement registered proprietor

Union of India & Ors. v. Sh Nandan Kumar

30 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6706-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order setting aside termination based on a negative CFSL report without issuing a show cause notice, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice in service matters.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant termination of service natural justice show cause notice CFSL report

Varre Sai Pranav Sudhanshu v. Union of India & Anr.

30 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:6587

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination results, holding that the Central Administrative Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over recruitment-related disputes under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Central Administrative Tribunal Civil Services Examination UPSC

AM Associates India Pvt Ltd v. JSC OGCC Kazstroy Service

30 Aug 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:6780

Delhi High Court upheld Plaintiff’s ex-parte decree for recovery under a Corporate Guarantee assigned to it, affirming jurisdiction, limitation, and enforceability despite foreign proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Corporate Guarantee Assignment Agreement Limitation Act Territorial Jurisdiction