SPML Infra Limited v. Delhi Jal Board

Delhi High Court · 31 Aug 2024 · 2024:DHC:5711
C. Hari Shankar
OMP(MISC.) (COMM) 559/2024
2024:DHC:5711
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to counsel's unavailability and prior adjournments.

Full Text
Translation output
OMP(MISC.) (COMM) 559/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 559/2024 and IA 35094/2024
SPML INFRA LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Parag Chaturvedi and Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocates
VERSUS
DELHI JAL BOARD .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL)
01.08.2024
JUDGMENT

1. This is a petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996[1] seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, which is scheduled to expire on 31 August

2024.

2. Mr. Karunesh Tandon, learned counsel for the respondent, strenuously opposes this petition and submits that the only ground on which the extension of the mandate is being sought is that the counsel who is to argue the matter on behalf of the petitioner is not available on 3 August 2024, when the matter is next listed.

3. Mr. Parag Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent has also earlier taken adjournments. “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter OMP(MISC.) (COMM) 559/2024

4. In this view of the matter, without entering into this imbroglio, I am inclined to extend the mandate of the learned Arbitrator for three months with effect from 31 August 2024.

5. The petition stands allowed in the aforesaid extent.