Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Pankaj Kumar Verma v. Bar Council of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging omission from the Bar Council electoral roll after the respondent agreed to include the petitioner’s name before elections.
V.K. Gulati v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court directed the New Delhi Municipal Council to decide the petitioner's representation regarding a disputed electricity bill and faulty meter within four weeks and restrained coercive action pending such decision.
Narendra Sharma v. Bar Council of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking alphabetical arrangement of election candidates' list as infructuous after publication but allowed future representations.
Karimpur Welfare Trust v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation for recognition of its college and directing the authority to decide it expeditiously with a reasoned order.
Ashtavakra Institute of Rehabilitation Science & Research v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by Ashtavakra Institute as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Ashtavakra Institute of Rehabilitation Science & Research v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition relying on the principle of parity with an earlier decision, disposing of the matter without costs.
Swami Vivekanand B Ed Teacher Training College v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner one final opportunity to submit requisite land documents for approval of additional B.Ed. seats, quashing prior rejections based solely on non-submission.
P.N. Flowers v. M/s Ferns & Petals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral breach of a franchise agreement clause does not constitute a criminal offence and must be resolved through civil remedies, dismissing the petition seeking criminal prosecution.
Burari Kalyan Mandal v. The Government of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court quashed the administrative order allotting a community centre on Gaon Sabha land for Assembly Constituency office use, emphasizing the need to consider original land purpose and community interests.
Bhagwat Prasad v. Ramesh Chand
The Delhi High Court held that permission by the Supreme Court to initiate fresh proceedings does not imply condonation of delay under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, and dismissed the appeal against the suit being barred by limitation.
Apar Industries Ltd v. Alliancz Poly-Chem Overseas Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld acquittal in cheque dishonor cases where the complainant failed to subject its witness to cross-examination, emphasizing the necessity of discharging initial burden before statutory presumption applies.
Apar Industries Ltd v. Alliancz Poly-Chem Overseas Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal under Section 138 NI Act where the complainant failed to subject its witness to cross-examination, resulting in incomplete evidence and failure to discharge initial burden of proof.
Parasramika Holdings Pvt Ltd; Mili Marketing Pvt Ltd; Moran Plantation Pvt Ltd v. Ambience Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent’s appointment of the sole arbitrator under the arbitration agreement is valid and the court cannot interfere under Section 11; challenges to arbitrator’s eligibility must be raised during arbitration proceedings.
Parasramika Holdings Pvt Ltd; Mili Marketing Pvt Ltd; Moran Plantation Pvt Ltd v. Ambience Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent’s unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator under the arbitration agreement is valid and challenges to the arbitrator’s eligibility under the Fifth Schedule must be raised during arbitration proceedings, not at the appointment stage.
Parasramika Holdings Pvt Ltd; Mili Marketing Pvt Ltd; Moran Plantation Pvt Ltd v. Ambience Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent’s unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator under the arbitration agreement is valid and the court cannot interfere under Section 11, with challenges to arbitrator eligibility to be raised during arbitration proceedings.
Surinder Singh v. Delhi High Court & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the petitioner’s removal from service to compulsory retirement, holding that while unauthorized absence constituted misconduct, the penalty was disproportionate given mitigating health factors and prior clean service.
Bimal Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that cross-examination in FEMA adjudication proceedings is not an absolute right but must be considered on a case-by-case basis with reasoned orders, partially allowing the appellant's appeal for reconsideration of cross-examination requests.
Azad Kumar Bhura v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Companies to stay the petitioner’s director disqualification and activate his DIN pending compliance with revival procedures under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following the precedent set in Sandeep Singh (supra).
M/S GENERAL SECURITY AND INFORMATION SERVICE v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER SRO: SILIGURI AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an EPF order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the Calcutta High Court.
M/S NEW ERA INDUSTRIES v. SONIA PAUL
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal permitting additional evidence and summoning of officials to prove partnership registration and authorization, emphasizing a pragmatic approach over procedural technicalities in civil suits.