Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Modtech Furniture Private Ltd. v. Ncube Planning Design Private Limited & Anr

28 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:1485

The Delhi High Court held that a suit under Order XXXVII CPC claiming jointly against a non-contractual party is not maintainable and dismissed the arbitration application due to the presence of a necessary party without an arbitration agreement, converting the suit into an ordinary suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC arbitration agreement Section 8 Arbitration Act 1996 privity of contract

National Highway & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited v. KMC Constructions Limited

28 Feb 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:1479

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting NHIDC's claim for penalty on delayed submission of Performance Bank Guarantee, holding no unilateral right to impose damages existed and that acceptance of security waived delay penalties.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Performance Bank Guarantee EPC Agreement liquidated damages arbitral award

Jitender Kumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

28 Feb 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:1466

The Delhi High Court acquitted the petitioner under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act on amicable settlement, directing release of deposited amount and imposing costs.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act conviction revision petition amicable settlement

Vir Chand Maini & Anr. v. Reliance Capital Limited

28 Feb 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:1487

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award in a mortgage loan dispute, affirming the binding nature of an arbitration clause despite post-signature interpolation and unregistered agreement, and validated the treatment of the mortgage loan as a simple loan agreement with proper interest calculation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Mortgage Loan Agreement Arbitral Award

Deepak Kumar v. The State & Anr.

28 Feb 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:1470

The High Court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is in favor of the cheque holder and the Trial Court erred in not summoning the accused, restoring the complaint for trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Presumption of debt

Sushma Chadha v. Union of India and Anr.

28 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1473

The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of a director due to a struck off company, directing compliance with Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following the precedent in Sandeep Singh.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Mahender Kumar Khandelwal v. Union of India and Ors.

28 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1477

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to avail relief under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, stayed his disqualification, and directed the Registrar of Companies to facilitate compliance following the precedent in Sandeep Singh & Anr.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 248(2) Director disqualification Struck off companies

Mohd. Jamal v. The State

28 Feb 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1475-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and conclusively prove homicidal death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory res gestae Section 302 IPC

Sajal Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1476

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Companies to stay the petitioner’s director disqualification and activate his DIN pending compliance with statutory provisions under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following the precedent in Sandeep Singh & Anr.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Director disqualification Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Ram Rahish Yadav v. Sushila Rani

28 Feb 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:1494

The Delhi High Court reduced motor accident compensation by excluding unproven income, applying a one-third deduction for personal expenses, and aligning non-pecuniary damages with Supreme Court precedent in Pranay Sethi.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation loss of dependency personal expenses deduction non-pecuniary damages

M/S HARE RAM SINGH SECURITY AGENCY v. PRASAR BHART & ORS

28 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1467

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging premature termination of a security services contract validly terminated under a contractual clause permitting termination by one month's notice without cause.

civil petition_dismissed contract termination security services contract one month's notice arbitration clause

Yogesh v. State

28 Feb 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:1471

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a Section 376 IPC case, holding that a false promise to marry does not constitute rape when the prosecutrix was already married.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 376 IPC false promise to marry consensual relationship

M/S HOTZ INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. v. DR. RAVI SINGH & ORS.

28 Feb 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1483

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to plaintiff's failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness, granting refund of amounts paid without interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell readiness and willingness financial capacity

The Coca-Cola Company & Anr v. Glacier Water Industries Ltd & Ors.

28 Feb 2018 · Manmohan J · 2018:DHC:1468

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to The Coca-Cola Company against unauthorized use of its registered trademark KINLEY by Glacier Water Industries, affirming trademark infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction registered trademark

National Highway Authority of India v. M/S PROGRESSIVE-MVR JOINT VENTURE

28 Feb 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:1482
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996, was a subsequent legislation for contract purposes as its rules were notified after tender submission, dismissing NHAI's challenge.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996 subsequent legislation contract interpretation

State v. Sanjay Sangwan

28 Feb 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:1480

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's leave petition against acquittal for being filed beyond the prescribed limitation period without sufficient explanation for delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed leave petition condonation of delay limitation period Section 5 Limitation Act

Tasleem v. State (NCT of Delhi)

28 Feb 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:1481
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Tasleem for robbery under Section 392 IPC, ruling that use or threat of a deadly weapon causing instant fear during theft constitutes robbery despite minor contradictions in witness accounts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery theft Section 392 IPC iron cutter

Apoorv Ranjan Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Feb 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1478

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Companies to follow precedent and allow directors of a struck-off company to regularize their status under Section 248(2) and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, staying their disqualification pending compliance.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors Companies Act 2013 Section 248(2) Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Indu Bala Jain v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

28 Feb 2018 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:8566

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging show cause notices are premature before final orders, directing the authority to consider replies and pass speaking orders, with liberty to approach the court thereafter.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition show cause notice speaking order prematurity

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Ananya Enterprises

28 Feb 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7180
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, rejecting a one-sided arbitration clause and referring disputes under a loan agreement to arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(2) appointment of arbitrator