Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Regenpowertech Private Limited v. Greeninfra Windfarm Assets Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court referred urgent interim relief applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to the duly constituted Arbitral Tribunal, emphasizing expeditious disposal and judicial restraint on merits.
Shyam Sunder Sharma & Anr. v. Delhi Jal Board & Ors.
Delhi High Court held Delhi Jal Board liable for electrocution death of a minor due to defective electrical installations and awarded Rs. 10 lakh compensation with interest.
Stadtmueller Gabriele v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte dismissal of a naturalization certificate review application for lack of notice and directed a fresh hearing to uphold natural justice.
State v. Bal Ram & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the State's leave petition to appeal the acquittal of accused persons, holding that minor discrepancies do not outweigh clear victim identification and medical evidence.
Robin Garg v. M/S VIJ Constructions Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed an ex-Director to repay Rs.16,31,174 misapplied after a winding up order under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing directors' liability for misfeasance during liquidation.
Kalpana & Anr. v. Maya Devi Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's decree for possession and damages, holding that ownership of immovable property requires a registered instrument and rejecting the appellants' claims under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act.
Anjum v. Mohd Irfan
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted permanent injunction to the Plaintiff restraining the Defendant from alienating or dispossessing her from the suit property, holding that unproved documents cannot defeat established possession and title.
Rajiv Gaur & Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief to directors disqualified due to striking off of a company's name, allowing them to function in other active companies pending final adjudication.
Jagdish Sharma v. Central Information Commission and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Information Commission to dispose of the petitioner’s pending appeal within 10 weeks, emphasizing the need to avoid undue delay in quasi-judicial proceedings.
Praveen Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT order that rejected raising the age limit for Physical Education Teacher recruitment, holding that interim participation in the exam does not confer any vested right.
Jitender Singh Bhandari & Anr v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation regarding termination and dues and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated timeframe.
M/S TRIG DETECTIVE SECURITY PRIVATE LTD v. SHRIKANT UPADHAYAY
The Delhi High Court upheld the labor court’s award holding the petitioner’s termination of the respondent illegal under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, directing reinstatement with back wages except for periods of gainful employment.
Harinder Pal Singh v. Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd
The Delhi High Court modified the mesne profits awarded in a possession suit to reflect a fair market rent based on a proved lease deed, granting interest from the suit filing date.
Vatan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner’s claim for appointment after the expiry of the selection panel’s validity, emphasizing strict adherence to recruitment rules and rejecting relief due to delay.
Shri Jai Prakash Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid despite possession, entitling landowners to compensation under the 2013 Act.
Yamaha Motor India Pvt. Ltd. v. Amit Jyoti
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-appearance due to lawyers' strike and procedural lapse, condoning delay in appeal and remanding the case for trial.
Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Kumar Chaudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid, entitling landowners to compensation under the 2013 Act despite possession being taken.
Azad Singh and Ors. v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation to the landowners.
Sanjeev Mathur & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed, granting the petitioners a declaration of lapse in respect of their land.
Bhola v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a passenger injured by falling from a moving train is entitled to compensation under the Railways Act despite non-production of a ticket, placing the burden on Railways to disprove bonafide passenger status.