Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Sushil Kataria v. Shani Devi & Ors.

01 Mar 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:1514

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal in a partition suit for failure to lead evidence despite ample opportunity, holding that deficient counsel services do not constitute sufficient cause under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC to admit additional evidence or remand the case.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 41 Rule 27 CPC sufficient cause partition suit registered Will

R. S. Misra v. Director, Press and Publicity Centre & Ors.

01 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:1511

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking permission to sue the Tanzanian government in India for copyright royalties, holding that no tenable cause of action was established and Section 86 CPC was inapplicable.

civil petition_dismissed Copyright Act, 1957 permission to sue foreign state cause of action Section 86 CPC

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Bibi Mashroom & Ors.

01 Mar 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:1515

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer’s appeal challenging compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the insurer’s liability under the Employees’ Compensation Act exceeded the award and the driver held a valid licence, thereby upholding the Claims Tribunal’s award and issuing directions for prudent disbursement.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act Employees’ Compensation Act Compensation Claims Tribunal

Sanjeev Srivastava & Anr. v. IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited & Ors.

01 Mar 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:1507

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding guarantors liable despite an arrangement between creditor and principal debtor, affirming that waiver of discharge rights under the Indian Contract Act precludes guarantors from claiming release.

civil petition_dismissed Significant personal guarantees arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 135 Indian Contract Act

M/S KRBL LIMITED v. M/S P K OVERSEAS PVT LTD

01 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1504

The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction is a mixed question of fact and law and allowed the petitioner to make submissions before the trial court accordingly, disposing of the petition without expressing opinion on merits.

civil other territorial jurisdiction mixed question of fact and law Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC Order VII Rule 10 CPC

Atlanta Limited v. National Highways & Infrastructure & Anr.

01 Mar 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:1499

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition restraining encashment of unconditional bank guarantees following contract termination for default, affirming the beneficiary's right to encash without proof of default absent fraud.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 bank guarantee contract termination

Pramod Kumar v. Religare Securities Ltd

01 Mar 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2018:DHC:1501-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging arbitral awards that upheld authorized trading and rejected claims of unauthorized F&O trades, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration awards absent patent illegality.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge public policy unauthorized trading

Lancer's Convent Senior Secondary School v. Jai Prakash

01 Mar 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:1512

The Delhi High Court held that termination of a school bus driver on bona fide loss of confidence without inquiry is justified despite subsequent acquittal, setting aside reinstatement with back wages ordered by the Labour Court.

labor appeal_allowed Significant loss of confidence termination without inquiry school bus driver rash and negligent driving

Pratyush Narnawre v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

01 Mar 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:1503

The Delhi High Court stayed a retrospective detention order barring students from exams due to attendance shortfall, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely communication by the university.

administrative petition_allowed Significant attendance requirement retrospective detention university examination procedural fairness

Kevin C.C. Wong v. The Delhi University and Anr.

01 Mar 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:1500-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld Delhi University's Sports Quota admission process, ruling that awarding marks based on team certificates and expert evaluations was not arbitrary or unfair.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Sports Quota admission Delhi University fair and transparent procedure arbitrariness in admission

Institute of Home Economics v. Prem Pal

01 Mar 2018 · Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:1498

The Delhi High Court held that repeated ad-hoc employment for perennial work constitutes unfair labour practice, rendering termination without compliance with Section 25-F illegal, and ordered reinstatement with 40% back wages, clarifying the limits of regularization under Umadevi.

labor appeal_allowed Significant ad-hoc appointment unfair labour practice Section 25-F Industrial Disputes Act regularization

SORREL HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD v. NAKODAR HOTELS PVT. LTD.

01 Mar 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:1510

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining a hotel operator from using the "Best Western" trademark after termination of the sub-license agreement, emphasizing that trademark rights cease immediately upon termination regardless of disputes over termination validity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark License Sub-Licence Agreement Interim Injunction Trademark Infringement

Castmaster Mobitec India Private Limited v. Delhi Transport Corporation

01 Mar 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:1508

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award upholding the respondent's entitlement to concession fees despite breach, reaffirming limited court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Concession Agreement Concession Fee

Shree Tirupathi Udyog v. Indraprastha Gas Limited

01 Mar 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:1509

The Delhi High Court held that stay of arbitration proceedings is not permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act and criminal proceedings do not bar arbitration unless the arbitration agreement itself is invalid.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim measures Stay of arbitration proceedings Non-arbitrability

Sawera Foundation; Sampark Foundation v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

01 Mar 2018 · V. Kameswar Rao

The Delhi High Court upheld the closure of unauthorized de-addiction centres operating without governmental permission, emphasizing the necessity of regulatory oversight to protect life and personal liberty.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant de-addiction centres unauthorized operation licensing North Delhi Municipal Corporation

S K Sehgal & Anr v. Delhi Administration & Anr

01 Mar 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:1506-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of leasehold rights to an industrial plot, holding that non-compliance with construction conditions and principles of res judicata preclude relief, and that Article 14 does not guarantee relief based on irregular concessions granted to others.

property appeal_dismissed Significant leasehold rights cancellation of lease construction condition Article 14

Union Bank of India v. Rajesh Saxena & Ors.

01 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1505

The court held that a bank must formally assert and prove its lien claim in execution proceedings while protecting the decree-holder's interests by depositing the decretal amount with the court.

civil petition_dismissed Significant general lien execution proceedings attachment order decree-holder

NTPC LIMITED v. AQUA DESIGNS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR

28 Feb 2018 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; A. K. CHAWLA · 2018:DHC:1484-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of NTPC's blacklisting of Aqua Designs, holding that inadvertent errors without fraudulent intent or benefit do not justify blacklisting under the Fraud Prevent Policy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant blacklisting Fraud Prevent Policy tender process misrepresentation

Keshav Kumar v. Union of India

28 Feb 2018 · S. Muralidhar; L.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:8693-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty to file appropriate petitions in accordance with law and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

other appeal_dismissed withdrawal of petition liberty to file writ petition dismissal as withdrawn

Anurag Rawat v. Bar Council of Delhi

28 Feb 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:8565

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition after the Bar Council agreed to include the enrolled advocate's name in the electoral roll before elections.

administrative petition_dismissed Bar Council electoral roll enrollment of advocates right to vote Bar Council elections