Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Surjeet Singh v. Swamberjeet Singh & Anr.

02 Sep 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 633
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff is entitled only to joint possession of the ground floor portion of the property as a co-owner, not exclusive possession, pending final adjudication of disputed Wills.

civil appeal_allowed Significant joint possession co-ownership Specific Relief Act 1963 Section 6

RAMACIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED

02 Sep 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:7662

The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's immunity order protecting NBCC from legacy Amrapali disputes does not bar suits arising from contracts entered into by NBCC post-appointment, and such suits are maintainable before the civil courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Supreme Court immunity Project Management Consultant Amrapali Group

TASLEEM AHMED v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

02 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7659-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that bail under Section 43D(5) of UAPA cannot be granted solely on the ground of delay in trial, especially when delay is caused by the accused, and interim bail applications must be filed before the Special Court.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43D(5) UAPA bail under UAPA delay in trial prima facie case

Vipul Aggarwal & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7648

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise and full settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Sushil @ Lalla v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7638

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 323, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise in criminal case Section 354 IPC Section 354A IPC

Sonu & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7651

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and full and final monetary compensation between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Satyawan Sehrawat v. State NCT of Delhi

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7636

Interim bail on medical grounds was denied to a habitual offender involved in serious crimes due to availability of alternative caretakers and the need to protect the trial process.

criminal petition_dismissed interim bail medical grounds habitual offender organized crime

Sandeep Singh and Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7640

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Hemant Khandelwal and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7642

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following a full compromise and settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute compromise

Dinesh Godara v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7649

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC on the ground of compromise between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 279 IPC Section 338 IPC compromise

Badal @ Badal Rajput and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7650

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and full and final compromise between parties in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Pankaj Aggarwal v. Meenakshi Dubey

02 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:7619-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to decide disputed factual issues as preliminary issues under Order XIV Rule 2(2) CPC and denied stay of suit pending a related proceeding.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XIV Rule 2(2) CPC preliminary issues family settlement gift deed

Rohit Aggarwal v. Sandeep Kumar Bhatt

02 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7768

The Delhi High Court disposed of a criminal revision petition based on a settlement whereby the petitioner agreed to pay the respondent Rs. 2.25 lakhs in three installments, directing the parties to record their statements before the trial court.

criminal other settlement criminal revision petition payment installments disposal of petition

Sohan Lal @ Sonu @ Akash & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

02 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7696
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 397 IPC but granted the appellant probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, recognizing the discretionary relief despite the mandatory minimum sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery Section 397 IPC Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 mandatory minimum sentence

Ajay & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

02 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7641

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable compromise and withdrawal of complaint in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Kartik Venu v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:7632-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of appellants accused of criminal conspiracy in the 2020 Delhi riots, holding that prima facie evidence under Section 43D of the UA(P) Act bars bail despite prolonged incarceration, balancing constitutional rights with public interest.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi riots 2020 criminal conspiracy bail under UAPA Section 43D UA(P) Act

Kailash Kumar & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

02 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7656
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court altered the appellants' conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to attempt to cause culpable homicide under Section 308 IPC and modified their sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 308 IPC Attempt to murder Intention to cause murder

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. PVR Ltd

01 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:7601-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that entertainment tax subsidies retained by multiplexes are capital receipts, ESOP/ESPS expenses are allowable revenue expenditure, and Rule 8D is prospective, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Entertainment tax subsidy Capital receipt Revenue expenditure ESOP

Axis Finance Limited v. Arjun

01 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:7918
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Atifa Tasleem

01 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7680-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed MCD's petition and upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a second-ranked physically handicapped candidate due to the first candidate's prolonged inaction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Physically Handicapped category appointment Central Administrative Tribunal selection process