Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

A K Dixit v. Commissioner North Delhi Municipal Corporation

26 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8638-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the compulsory retirement of a government servant, holding that subsequent good service record and promotions must be considered before exercising such power under FR 56(j).

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement FR 56(j) CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 judicial review

Dayal Kumar Nandi & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8745

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction does not extend to election disputes in a privately managed society without a public law element, directing petitioners to seek civil remedies.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ petition Article 226 private society Societies Registration Act

Subhashini Dewan v. Deputy Commissioner MCD & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8744

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to challenge the sealing order before the Supreme Court-appointed Judicial Committee, restraining coercive action pending its decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Sealing Order Master Plan for Delhi 2021 Convenient Shopping Centre Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Rachna Badhwar & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

26 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8743

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining the MCD from taking coercive action against the petitioners' property pending hearing of their appeals before the ATMCD, which currently lacks a Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition interim protection demolition order Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar

26 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8630-DB

The Delhi High Court restored the disciplinary penalty against a jail official by holding that judicial review in departmental enquiries is limited and the Tribunal erred in reappreciating evidence and setting aside credible findings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry judicial review disciplinary proceedings natural justice

Manjeet v. Indian Olympic Association and Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2026:DHC:759

The Delhi High Court held that exclusion of a meritorious athlete from Winter Olympic selection on non-participation in the World Championship was arbitrary and illegal, directing his inclusion based on objective FIS eligibility criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Olympic selection FIS Qualification System Articles 14 and 21 natural justice

Union of India & Anr. v. Sandeep Kumar

25 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6244-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed an application to record the appearance of the petitioners' counsel omitted in a prior judgment by issuing a corrigendum.

other other appearance of counsel corrigendum procedural omission court record

Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax DGST Delhi v. Global Opportunities Private Limited

25 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8798-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that educational consultancy services provided to foreign universities are export of services and not intermediary services, thereby entitling the service provider to GST refund.

tax petition_dismissed Significant export of services intermediary services IGST Act 2017 GST refund

Srikanta Sutar v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8805-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to apply for posting at specified locations and decide the application in accordance with a prior reasoned order.

administrative petition_allowed posting transfer CRPF abolition of post

MS RS Trading Co v. Principal Commissioner of CGST & Ors.

25 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8668-DB

The Delhi High Court held that statutory appeal with pre-deposit is the proper remedy against GST demand and penalty orders, dismissing the writ petition but permitting condonation of delay for filing appeal.

tax appeal_allowed CGST Act 2017 Input Tax Credit Fake invoices Pre-deposit

Libra Buildwell LLP v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr

25 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8730-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed adjustment of amounts deposited under an interim order against property tax dues under the SUNIYO amnesty scheme while refusing adjustment of self-assessed payments, permitting withdrawal of the writ petition to avail scheme benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant property tax amnesty scheme Sumpattikar Niptaan Yojana interim order

Kamal Gupta v. Nisha Gupta

25 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8682-DB

The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance from Rs.75,000 to Rs.1.5 lakhs per month based on inferred financial capacity of the husband from firm turnover and bank transactions.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance maintenance pendente lite financial capacity family court

Sonu v. State NCT of Delhi

25 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8649

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for armed robbery and related offences based on reliable injured witness testimony corroborated by medical and ballistic evidence, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery firearm identification injured witness

Nirmal Lugani & Ors. v. Late Sh Ram Sarup Lugani & Ors.

25 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8540-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the order permitting substitution of legal representatives before grant of leave under Section 92 CPC, holding such impleadment permissible under inherent powers and not barred by Rahul Jain precedent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 92 CPC leave to institute suit substitution of parties impleadment

Consortium of Worlds Window Exim Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Axis Bank Ltd & Ors.

25 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8568-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of an In-Principle Letter of Intent and invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee due to the appellants' non-compliance, rejecting allegations of fraud related to insolvency proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant In-Principle Letter of Intent Bank Guarantee Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 IBC

Manoj Jain v. Varsha Jain

25 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8524-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, upholding the Family Court's finding that he failed to prove the allegations and was himself guilty of desertion.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cruelty desertion burden of proof

Sudesh & Ors. v. Sh. Vijender Singh & Ors.

25 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8567-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed reopening of defence evidence to examine the sole surviving attesting witness to a Will after closure of evidence, emphasizing the primacy of material evidence and the Court's discretion to ensure justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant attesting witness Will reopening evidence Order XVI CPC

Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi v. Jyotsna Bedi

25 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8566-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a consent decree granting lifetime residential possession, rejecting attempts to defeat it via prior agreements and property alterations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consent Decree Execution of Decree Joint Family Agreement Possession

Amitesh Harmukh v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8590-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed suspension of sentence pending appeal in a sexual assault conviction based on disputed extra-judicial confessions and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing judicial discretion under Article 226.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant suspension of sentence extra-judicial confession sexual assault intoxication

Manoj & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

25 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8629

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR dowry harassment Section 498A IPC