Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
K.A. Thomas and Anr v. LIC Housing Finance Ltd
The court held that the 120-day limit for filing Written Statement in commercial suits is mandatory and upheld the dropping of a party under insolvency moratorium, dismissing the petition challenging these orders.
Ranjit Bajaj v. All India Football Federation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim stay on the appointment of a former elected office bearer as Secretary General of AIFF, holding that such appointment violates the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports circular and principles of good governance to prevent conflict of interest.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions challenging rejection of National Overseas Scholarship applications on technical grounds relating to income certificates, directing grant of scholarships and calling for procedural reforms.
Santosh Chaudhary v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that minor procedural lapses do not vitiate trial and stringent conditions under Section 37 NDPS Act for bail were not met.
Sharad Kapoor v. Pramod Telecom Private Limited
The High Court upheld the trial court's order directing fresh service of summons and dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of the affidavit of service, emphasizing the mandatory satisfaction of the court regarding service under Order V Rule 20 CPC.
M/S KARSHIVNIK INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD v. M/S GOLF INTERNATIONAL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to file additional documents at a late stage in a commercial suit, holding that inadvertence is insufficient to justify belated filings under Order VII Rule 14 CPC.
Vinod Mehra v. Arun Mehra
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place additional relevant documents on record belatedly in a money recovery suit between brothers, imposing costs and permitting rebuttal evidence to ensure fairness.
Nishchaiy Behl & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vipin Kumar Chotala & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ajeet Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Manish Kumar and Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry harassment and related offences following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Simranpal Singh Dua and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Abhilash Agrawal and Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Dhruv Rai Sahore & Ors. v. State of GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Mohd. Tahir Hussain in a communal riots and murder case, holding that prima facie evidence of his role as instigator and conspirator outweighs grounds for bail despite prolonged incarceration.
Shardha Nand Bansal v. Ashok Kumar Bhalla
The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that issuance of cheques revives even time-barred debts as legally enforceable liabilities and the petitioner failed to rebut statutory presumptions.
Pabitra Narayan Pradhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail denied to the petitioner, the mastermind of a spurious cancer medicines racket, due to gravity of offences, territorial jurisdiction of Delhi Police, and his central role despite prolonged incarceration and delay in trial.
Brightstar Telecommunications India Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR against a company and its directors for alleged forgery and cheating involving blank signed cheques, holding the dispute to be civil in nature without prima facie criminal offence.
Union of India & Anr. v. Sunil Kumar
The High Court allowed an application to correct the record of a judgment by reflecting the appearance of the petitioners' counsel omitted in the original order.