Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Union of India & Ors. v. Ramesh Chandra Shukla

24 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8503-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that promotion takes effect only from the date it is granted and not from the date of recommendation, dismissing the claim for retrospective promotion absent mala fide delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant notional promotion Departmental Promotion Committee retrospective promotion Non Functional Upgradation

Rohit Dandriyal & Ors. v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr.

24 Sep 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the RBI to implement accessibility measures for visually impaired persons in currency notes and digital financial services, while recognizing currency redesign as a complex policy matter beyond judicial mandate.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant visually impaired currency note accessibility digital financial services Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Nikhil Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi

24 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8537

The Delhi High Court dismissed the fifth anticipatory bail application of accused Nikhil Jain in a property fraud case, holding no change in circumstances post dismissal of earlier bail pleas and censuring judicial and investigative lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail change in circumstances concealment of facts judicial indiscipline

State NCT of Delhi v. Karnail Singh

24 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8557-DB

The High Court upheld the acquittal of an accused in a minor sexual assault case due to lack of corroborative evidence and inconsistent testimony, emphasizing limited appellate interference in acquittals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal sexual assault minor hostile witness

A.R. Rahman v. Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar & Ors.

24 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025: DHC:2907

The Delhi High Court upheld interim relief recognizing the plaintiff’s prima facie authorship and copyright in the Indian classical musical composition “Shiva Stuti,” affirming protection of original compositions transmitted orally and directing credit attribution in the impugned song.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant copyright infringement Indian classical music Dagarvani Dhrupad authorship

Sheikh Habil v. State

24 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8533

Conviction for kidnapping and rape set aside due to denial of effective legal representation and failure to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, violating the accused's right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right to legal representation cross-examination fair trial kidnapping

Sh Inderjeet Singh v. Kaushalya Devi and Ors

24 Sep 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:8845-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's suit for damages challenging a final eviction order, holding that such matters are barred by res judicata and limitation and do not disclose a valid cause of action under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC eviction proceedings res judicata Delhi Rent Control Act

Rajnish v. State NCT of Delhi

24 Sep 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:8789
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and repeated sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, affirming the prosecutrix’s credible testimony and statutory presumptions regarding age and consent.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act minor victim sexual assault sterling witness

Sh. Naresh Chand Gupta & Anr. v. Vigneshwara Developers Pvt. Ltd.

24 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju

The Delhi High Court directed transfer of pending winding up petitions against Vigneshwara Developers Pvt. Ltd. from the High Court to the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 for further adjudication.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013 Section 434 winding up

Union of India & Ors. v. Sh Shubham Kumar

24 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8644-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a retest for a candidate affected by a technical glitch during a recruitment Skill/Typing Test, emphasizing fairness and discretion in procedural timelines.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Skill/Typing Test technical glitch fair opportunity retet

Ramesh Chand Chopra v. The State & Anr.

24 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8548

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448 and 380 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Sh. Suresh Kumar v. M/s NDPL and Anr

24 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8754
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as settled following an amicable resolution between the parties and permitted withdrawal of the petition.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement writ petition withdrawal of petition court disposal

Rohit v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8530

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 341, and 506 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Sultan & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

24 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8550

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Kripa Nath Mishra & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

24 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8525
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld summons against key accused in a dowry harassment case while quashing proceedings against others due to vague allegations, emphasizing cautious exercise of quashing powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC dowry harassment quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC

MS Sadiya Usmani and Anr. v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.

24 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8581

The Delhi High Court directed BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. to provide electricity connection to petitioners subject to formalities and disconnection upon MCD's action against unauthorized construction, balancing consumer rights and municipal regulations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity connection Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Mohd Nasir v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

24 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8579

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining demolition of the petitioner's property pending hearing of the appeal before the non-functional Appellate Tribunal MCD.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Interim Protection Appellate Tribunal MCD Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Mohit Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal

24 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8595-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the termination of a SSB constable’s services for alleged non-completion of probation, holding that termination orders must be based on valid recorded reasons and that the petitioner had satisfactorily completed probation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant probation period termination of service Sashastra Seema Bal Rules extension of probation

Directorate of Enforcement v. M/S Vikas WSP Ltd

24 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension orders apply to the 180-day provisional attachment period under the PMLA, extending its validity beyond 180 days during the pandemic and allowing the Adjudicating Authority to confirm the attachment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Provisional Attachment Order Limitation extension COVID-19 pandemic

Upinder Kaur Malhotra v. Capt Teghjeet Singh Malhotra

24 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8491-DB

The High Court held that divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act requires a joint petition evidencing clear mutual consent, and a Family Court cannot suo motu convert separate fault-based petitions into a mutual consent divorce decree.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13 Section 13B divorce by mutual consent