Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Libra Buildwell LLP v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed adjustment of amounts deposited under an interim order against property tax dues under the SUNIYO amnesty scheme while refusing adjustment of self-assessed payments, permitting withdrawal of the writ petition to avail scheme benefits.
Kamal Gupta v. Nisha Gupta
The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance from Rs.75,000 to Rs.1.5 lakhs per month based on inferred financial capacity of the husband from firm turnover and bank transactions.
Sonu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for armed robbery and related offences based on reliable injured witness testimony corroborated by medical and ballistic evidence, dismissing the appeal.
Nirmal Lugani & Ors. v. Late Sh Ram Sarup Lugani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the order permitting substitution of legal representatives before grant of leave under Section 92 CPC, holding such impleadment permissible under inherent powers and not barred by Rahul Jain precedent.
Consortium of Worlds Window Exim Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Axis Bank Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of an In-Principle Letter of Intent and invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee due to the appellants' non-compliance, rejecting allegations of fraud related to insolvency proceedings.
Manoj Jain v. Varsha Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, upholding the Family Court's finding that he failed to prove the allegations and was himself guilty of desertion.
Sudesh & Ors. v. Sh. Vijender Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed reopening of defence evidence to examine the sole surviving attesting witness to a Will after closure of evidence, emphasizing the primacy of material evidence and the Court's discretion to ensure justice.
Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi v. Jyotsna Bedi
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a consent decree granting lifetime residential possession, rejecting attempts to defeat it via prior agreements and property alterations.
Amitesh Harmukh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed suspension of sentence pending appeal in a sexual assault conviction based on disputed extra-judicial confessions and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing judicial discretion under Article 226.
Manoj & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
K.A. Thomas and Anr v. LIC Housing Finance Ltd
The court held that the 120-day limit for filing Written Statement in commercial suits is mandatory and upheld the dropping of a party under insolvency moratorium, dismissing the petition challenging these orders.
Ranjit Bajaj v. All India Football Federation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim stay on the appointment of a former elected office bearer as Secretary General of AIFF, holding that such appointment violates the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports circular and principles of good governance to prevent conflict of interest.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions challenging rejection of National Overseas Scholarship applications on technical grounds relating to income certificates, directing grant of scholarships and calling for procedural reforms.
Santosh Chaudhary v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that minor procedural lapses do not vitiate trial and stringent conditions under Section 37 NDPS Act for bail were not met.
Sharad Kapoor v. Pramod Telecom Private Limited
The High Court upheld the trial court's order directing fresh service of summons and dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of the affidavit of service, emphasizing the mandatory satisfaction of the court regarding service under Order V Rule 20 CPC.
M/S KARSHIVNIK INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD v. M/S GOLF INTERNATIONAL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to file additional documents at a late stage in a commercial suit, holding that inadvertence is insufficient to justify belated filings under Order VII Rule 14 CPC.
Vinod Mehra v. Arun Mehra
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place additional relevant documents on record belatedly in a money recovery suit between brothers, imposing costs and permitting rebuttal evidence to ensure fairness.
Nishchaiy Behl & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vipin Kumar Chotala & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ajeet Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.