Delhi High Court

58,912 judgments

Year:

Helsinn Healthcare SA v. AET Laboratories Private Limited & Anr

26 Sep 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:8655

The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against defendants for patent infringement, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish imminent threat or territorial jurisdiction for quia timet relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant quia timet injunction patent infringement territorial jurisdiction Order XXXIX CPC

Varinder Kaur v. Daljit Kaur & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra Kumar Upadhya... · 2025:DHC:8641-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a gift deed executed by a senior citizen can be declared void under Section 23(1) of the Senior Citizens Act even without an express maintenance condition if the transferee fails to provide basic amenities and physical needs, affirming the cancellation of the gift deed in favor of the appellant.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Senior Citizens Act Section 23(1) gift deed cancellation basic amenities

BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR v. KAMESWAR RAO

26 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8710-DB

The Delhi High Court holds that both Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to this view.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income-Tax Act Faceless Assessing Officer Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Reassessment proceedings

Huawei Technologies Cooperatief U.A. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation-2(1)(1), Delhi

26 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8708-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued without information of escapement of income and directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh reasoned order considering all relevant facts and tax provisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 194LC

Bed Ram v. Union of India & Anr.

26 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that 'Sailabi' land lacking building potential justifies lower valuation and that claimants failed to prove entitlement to higher compensation based on adjacent lands.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 fair market value Sailabi land compensation enhancement

Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Svera Agro Limited & Anr.

26 Sep 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:8797

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting Tata's well-known trademarks and packaging against infringing rock salt products, exempted pre-institution mediation due to urgency, and ordered refund of court fees following early settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trade Mark infringement Well-known trademark Permanent injunction Trade dress

Amit Kumar v. Union of India

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8651-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the ex parte dismissal of a CRPF constable due to violation of natural justice in departmental enquiry and remanded for fresh enquiry ensuring right to cross-examination and defence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice right to cross-examination CRPF Act 1949

Dropadi Tripathi v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 895
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of disability pension for hypertension to an Army retiree, holding that absent medical evidence attributing the disability to a non-service cause, the disability must be presumed service-connected.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability pension military service causal connection Release Medical Board

Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8718-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s representation under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act within three weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action before considering suspension of sentence.

criminal other Procedural writ petition suspension of sentence Section 117(2) BSF Act, 1968 Section 118 BSF Act, 1968

Attar Singh v. Union of India

26 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8714-DB

The Delhi High Court directed substitution of the petitioner’s daughter as the family pension beneficiary following the death of the original beneficiary, the petitioner’s wife.

administrative petition_allowed family pension Central Reserve Police Force pension beneficiary substitution retiral benefits

Baldev Singh & Anr. v. The District Collector Officer & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8785

The Delhi High Court directed full compliance with an unchallenged Recovery Certificate for payment to laborers, ordering balance payment with interest and costs due to respondent's non-compliance.

labor petition_allowed Recovery Certificate Regional Labour Commissioner enforcement payment

M/S NITYA WORLD HOLIDAYS PVT LTD & ORS v. M/S AMAN TRAVELS LTD

26 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8771-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex-parte commercial decree due to inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 13(1A) Order IX Rule 13 CPC ex-parte decree

M S Jeevika Socii Pvt Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 94 Zone 8 & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8777-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, granting opportunity to file reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

M S Deep Autotec Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 62 & Ors.

26 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8776-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order passed without hearing due to suspension of GST registration, granting the petitioner an opportunity to file reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of related notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

M/S A. L. EXPORTS v. Union of India

26 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8746-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST appellate order passed without affording the petitioner a hearing, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of natural justice and proper communication of hearing notices.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice personal hearing refund claim Input Tax Credit

Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

26 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8779

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings and set aside conviction under Section 324 IPC based on a voluntary compromise, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in a non-compoundable offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 324 IPC Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offence quashing of criminal proceedings

Lalan Ram v. State; Ramishwar Ram v. State

26 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8778

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307/34 IPC but modified sentences to the period already served and reduced fines, applying Supreme Court guidelines on release of convicts who have undergone substantial incarceration.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC injured witness testimony sentence modification

Tanpreet Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

26 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8782

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of petitioner’s property due to procedural lapses by MCD and allowed time to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice

Ashish Sharma v. MCD & Anr.

26 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8781
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition and restoration of electricity pending appeal before the MCD Appellate Tribunal due to its non-functioning status.

administrative petition_allowed Procedural Vacation Notice Demolition Regularization Interim Protection

Commissioner of Customs Export v. Mayank Gupta

26 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8772-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Customs Department's appeal seeking additional penalty under Section 114AA against Mr. Mayank Gupta, holding that the penalty already imposed under Section 114 was adequate given his limited role in the illegal export of Red Sanders.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 114 Section 114AA Penalty