Union of India & Anr. v. Sandeep Kumar

Delhi High Court · 25 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:6244-DB
Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain
W.P.(C) 12741/2023
2025:DHC:6244-DB
other other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed an application to record the appearance of the petitioners' counsel omitted in a prior judgment by issuing a corrigendum.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 12741/2023
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC
VERSUS
SANDEEP KUMAR .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R 25.09.2025
CM APPL. 61296/2025
JUDGMENT

1. By this application, the learned counsel for the petitioners/applicants states that his appearance has not been recorded in the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/applicants, the application is allowed.

3. The appearance of Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, learned CGSC, shall be duly reflected for the petitioners in the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.

4. The application stands disposed of.

5. This Order shall be uploaded as a Corrigendum to the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 25, 2025/b/k/DG