Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

ESCORTS LTD v. UNIVERSAL TRACTOR HOLDING LLC

13 Mar 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that prior confirmation of a foreign arbitration award by the foreign court is not required for its enforcement in India under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition challenging execution of such award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant foreign arbitration award enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 New York Convention

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. PRABHA DEVI AND OTHERS

13 Mar 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that motor vehicle insurance policies do not cover death or injury to the owner of the vehicle unless personal accident insurance is separately taken, and thus the insurer is not liable to pay compensation to the owner's legal heirs under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 147 insurance liability owner's death

Vipin Jaiswal v. State of A.P.

13 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry death case, holding that a demand for money to start a business post-marriage is not dowry and emphasizing the need for expert verification of disputed suicide notes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry demand Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.

13 Mar 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that erroneous answer keys vitiate selection results but directed re-evaluation rather than fresh exams, protecting innocent appointees from ouster while ensuring merit-based appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Model Answer Key competitive examination re-evaluation merit list

Arindam Chattopadhyay v. State of West Bengal

13 Mar 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court held that employees performing duties of a higher post for a prolonged period are entitled to the pay scale of that post under Articles 14 and 16, even without formal promotion.

labor appeal_allowed Significant equal pay for equal work acting charge temporary promotion pay scale

Allahabad Bank v. A.C. Aggarwal

13 Mar 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that an employee paid gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme without refunding gratuity, affirming the statutory right to receive both benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 pension entitlement gratuity Allahabad Bank

Ramswaroop and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing their appeal and affirming the prescribed sentences under Sections 302 and 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC injured eyewitness unlawful assembly

Bharat Bhushan & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that mere silence or refusal to settle dowry disputes by husband's relatives does not constitute cruelty or harassment under Sections 304B and 498A IPC, and acquitted appellant Nos. 2 and 4 accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC cruelty

The Official Liquidator, U.P. and Uttarakhand v. Allahabad Bank

12 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over auctions and sales under the RDB Act, and the Official Liquidator must challenge such sales only through appeals before the DRT, not by approaching the Company Court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Companies Act, 1956 Official Liquidator Debt Recovery Tribunal

Garre Mallikharjuna Rao v. Nalabothu Punniah

12 Mar 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's dismissal of a suit for specific performance, holding that the High Court erred in relying on unreliable handwriting expert evidence and inconsistent pleadings to grant the decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell handwriting expert evidence Section 20 Specific Relief Act

Joseph John Peter Sandy v. Veronica Thomas Rajkumar

12 Mar 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision dismissing the appellant's suit for rectification of property settlement deeds, holding that the unregistered agreement was not proved and was obtained by undue influence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Relief Act Section 26 undue influence Section 16 Contract Act

Budh Singh v. State of Haryana

11 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 32A of the NDPS Act, ruling that denial of remission benefits does not violate Article 20(1) or other fundamental rights as remission does not reduce the sentence imposed by the court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 32A NDPS Act remission of sentence Article 20(1) Constitution ex post facto penalty

Debabrata Dash v. Jatindra Prasad Das

11 Mar 2013 · R. M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that ad hoc service under the Fast Track Courts scheme does not count for seniority in the Senior Branch cadre unless regularized by substantive appointment under the Orissa Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant seniority ad hoc appointment Fast Track Courts Orissa Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963

State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. & Anr.

11 Mar 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court upheld that royalty under the Mines and Minerals Act is payable only on metal content in ore actually removed from leased land, excluding tailings or rejects dumped within the leased area.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant royalty mines and minerals mineral concession rules tailings

Aresh @ Ashok J. Mehta v. Spl. Tahsildar, Balgaum Karnataka & Anr.

11 Mar 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to interest on delayed compensation from the date of vesting under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, including on amounts paid in cash, overruling the restrictive government circular.

property appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 compensation interest on delayed payment vesting of land

Gambhirsinh R. Dekare v. Falgunbhai Chimanbhai Patel

11 Mar 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that the Editor named in a newspaper is prima facie responsible for defamatory content published therein and set aside the High Court's quashing of the complaint against him, directing the trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant defamation editorial liability Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 Section 7 presumption

Modinsab Kasimsab Kanchagar v. State of Karnataka

11 Mar 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 304B IPC for dowry death as the demand was for a society loan, but upheld conviction under Section 498A IPC for harassment related to unlawful demand.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Goudappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka

11 Mar 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court upheld life convictions under Section 302/34 IPC, affirming that joint liability arises from common intention inferred from conduct and circumstances.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant common intention Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC joint liability

State of U.P. v. Hari Ram

11 Mar 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that deemed vesting under Section 10(3) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act does not amount to physical possession, and possession must be taken following Sections 10(5) and 10(6), entitling landholders to protection under the Repeal Act if possession was not lawfully taken before repeal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act Section 10(3) deemed vesting de jure possession

G.M. Siddeshwar v. Prasanna Kumar

08 Mar 2013 · R.M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that an election petitioner is not required to file an additional affidavit under Order VI Rule 15(4) CPC beyond the affidavit mandated by Section 83(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and defects in affidavits are curable without summary dismissal of the petition.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant election petition affidavit Order VI Rule 15(4) CPC Section 83 Representation of the People Act