Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Indrajit Sureshprasad Bind & Ors. v. State of Gujarat

18 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to lack of credible evidence of cruelty or harassment and doubts over the authenticity of key prosecution documents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC

Nirmala J. Jhala v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

18 Mar 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside compulsory retirement of a judicial officer due to reliance on inadmissible preliminary enquiry statements and violation of natural justice, emphasizing limited judicial review and protection of honest subordinate judiciary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry standard of proof preliminary enquiry natural justice

Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another v. State of Maharashtra

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that delay in trial does not automatically warrant quashing of criminal proceedings in corruption cases, emphasizing a balanced approach considering accused's conduct and societal interest.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 corruption disproportionate assets

The Union of India v. Anil Kumar Sarkar

15 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that promotion cannot be withheld under the sealed cover procedure unless charge sheet, suspension, or prosecution is pending on the relevant date, and directed promotion of the respondent accordingly.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant sealed cover procedure promotion disciplinary proceedings charge sheet

Kamlendra Singh @ Pappu Singh v. State of M.P.

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of a juvenile accused convicted of attempted murder, setting aside the sentence and directing the case to be dealt with by the Juvenile Justice Board under the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice juvenility claim Section 307 IPC concurrent sentence

Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi

15 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that High Courts have inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in non-compoundable matrimonial offences when parties have amicably settled their disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings non-compoundable offences matrimonial disputes

MD. SHAKIR JAMAL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

15 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld bail and exempted official translation for the appellant in a criminal case involving a minor financial discrepancy of Rs. 2000/- during his tenure as B.D.O.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail official translation exemption audit report discrepancy financial irregularity

C. LATHA & ORS v. M/S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD

15 Mar 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court restored the original compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, setting aside the High Court's reduction of the amount.

civil appeal_allowed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation appeal High Court

Nagendrappa Natikar v. Neelamma

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

A compromise under Section 125 CrPC does not bar a wife from claiming maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, as Section 125 proceedings are summary and do not conclusively determine personal rights.

family petition_dismissed Significant Section 125 CrPC Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act maintenance claim

State of U.P. v. Satpal

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the State of U.P. against Satpal, holding that the judgment in a related civil appeal governs the present case.

civil appeal_dismissed Supreme Court civil appeal precedent binding judgment

State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.

14 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

Confessional statements made by accused in a separate case are inadmissible against others not jointly tried, and witnesses recording such confessions cannot be summoned as defense witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confession admissibility Indian Evidence Act Sections 24, 25, 26, 30 MCOCA hearsay rule

Satya Pal v. State of Haryana & Anr.

13 Mar 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld conviction for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, affirming the statutory presumption of dowry-related harassment and rejecting the appellant's defense due to failure to rebut with credible evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 113B Indian Evidence Act delay in lodging FIR

ESCORTS LTD v. UNIVERSAL TRACTOR HOLDING LLC

13 Mar 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that prior confirmation of a foreign arbitration award by the foreign court is not required for its enforcement in India under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition challenging execution of such award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant foreign arbitration award enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 New York Convention

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. PRABHA DEVI AND OTHERS

13 Mar 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that motor vehicle insurance policies do not cover death or injury to the owner of the vehicle unless personal accident insurance is separately taken, and thus the insurer is not liable to pay compensation to the owner's legal heirs under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 147 insurance liability owner's death

Vipin Jaiswal v. State of A.P.

13 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry death case, holding that a demand for money to start a business post-marriage is not dowry and emphasizing the need for expert verification of disputed suicide notes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry demand Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.

13 Mar 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that erroneous answer keys vitiate selection results but directed re-evaluation rather than fresh exams, protecting innocent appointees from ouster while ensuring merit-based appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Model Answer Key competitive examination re-evaluation merit list

Arindam Chattopadhyay v. State of West Bengal

13 Mar 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court held that employees performing duties of a higher post for a prolonged period are entitled to the pay scale of that post under Articles 14 and 16, even without formal promotion.

labor appeal_allowed Significant equal pay for equal work acting charge temporary promotion pay scale

Allahabad Bank v. A.C. Aggarwal

13 Mar 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that an employee paid gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme without refunding gratuity, affirming the statutory right to receive both benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 pension entitlement gratuity Allahabad Bank

Ramswaroop and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing their appeal and affirming the prescribed sentences under Sections 302 and 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC injured eyewitness unlawful assembly

Bharat Bhushan & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that mere silence or refusal to settle dowry disputes by husband's relatives does not constitute cruelty or harassment under Sections 304B and 498A IPC, and acquitted appellant Nos. 2 and 4 accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC cruelty