High Court of Crl

10 judgments

Year:

Bimla Devi v. State

17 Jan 2017 · Hima Kohli · 2011:DHC:10542

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a criminal revision petition after the underlying FIR was quashed, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.

criminal appeal_dismissed FIR quashing criminal revision petition withdrawal of petition exemption from personal appearance

Anant Slinderam v. Saroj Gupta

13 May 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:6889

The High Court quashed the complaint against a director who resigned before cheque dishonour, holding that vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act applies only to persons in charge at the time of the offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability director liability

A E P Sureshan v. State & Anr

16 Nov 2011 · M.L. Mehta · 2011:DHC:9466

The High Court quashed a complaint under the NDMC Act against a petitioner who was not employed by the company and was absent from India on the date of the alleged offence.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. NDMC Act 1994 quashing of complaint misuse of premises

Ajay Talwar v. Prem Singh

04 May 2011 · Mukta Gupta · 2011:DHC:16530

The High Court dismissed the leave to appeal petition against acquittal under Section 138 NI Act due to inordinate delay without sufficient explanation, refusing to condone the delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed condonation of delay leave to appeal Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act acquittal

AMITA CHANDOK & ANR. v. INTEC SECURITIES LTD.

10 Mar 2011 · HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA; 10.03.2011 · 2011:DHC:9707

The High Court held that guarantors of a loan are not criminally liable under Section 138 NI Act for dishonour of cheques issued by the principal debtor and quashed summons against them.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act guarantor liability dishonour of cheque criminal liability

Jagdish Prasad v. State

09 Feb 2011 · Hima Kohli · 2011:DHC:13614

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal revision petition with leave, dismissing it as withdrawn while preserving the petitioner's right to raise defenses at trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural criminal revision petition withdrawal of petition leave of court defenses in trial

Gurmit Singh & Ors v. State & Ors

30 Nov 2010 · Hima Kohli · 2010:DHC:15361

The High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a civil tenancy dispute upon a voluntary settlement between parties, imposing costs on petitioners for misuse of legal process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement civil dispute

Prem Chand Gupta v. State

05 Oct 2010 · Hima Kohli · 2010:DHC:8069

The Delhi High Court held that delay caused by the accused seeking frequent adjournments to engage legal aid counsel does not warrant directions for expeditious trial and directed the accused to cooperate for timely disposal.

criminal petition_dismissed adjournment expeditious trial legal aid counsel Section 82 CrPC

Gopal Nnyn v. Anju Bala & Anr.

14 Sep 2010 · Hima Kohli · 2010:DHC:9777

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal revision petition after deposit of Rs. 25,000, dismissing the petition as withdrawn while reserving the right to challenge the order later.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural criminal revision petition withdrawal of petition deposit of amount leave to withdraw

Satpal Singh v. State

19 Aug 2010 · Hima Kohli · 2010:DHC:8630

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to travel abroad as withdrawn, granting liberty to file appropriate proceedings for exit visa and travel permission.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition withdrawal permission to travel abroad exit visa NDPS court order