Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Uma Kant Panwar v. Devi Lal Sah

08 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court expunged adverse remarks made by the High Court against the appellant after the respondent-State settled the claim, partly allowing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed adverse remarks strictures expunged settlement

Indian Soaps & Toiletries Makers Association v. Ozair Husain

07 Mar 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot direct mandatory vegetarian/non-vegetarian labeling on drugs and cosmetics, as such regulatory powers lie exclusively with the Central Government under delegated legislation.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant consumer right to information vegetarian labeling non-vegetarian labeling Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

NTPC LTD. v. BHASIN CONSTRUCTION P. LTD.

07 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that escalation payments for increased minimum wages under a construction contract must be calculated from the 'fair wages' declared in the tender, not the statutory minimum wages, and directed payment accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant escalation clause minimum wages fair wages construction contract

Pournima Suryakant Pawar v. State of Maharashtra

07 Mar 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of Scheduled Tribe certificate claims by two petitioners, affirming limited judicial interference in factual findings of the Scrutiny Committee supported by evidence.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Tribe certificate Scrutiny Committee Judicial review Factual findings

Joydeb Patra & Ors. v. State of West Bengal

06 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court overturned murder convictions due to lack of conclusive forensic evidence of poisoning and reaffirmed that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt before burden shifts to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant poisoning burden of proof Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Rajamani v. State of Kerala

06 Mar 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 55(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act but reduced the sentence considering the appellant's limited role as a driver without ownership or financial interest in the contraband.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Kerala Abkari Act Section 55(a) illegal transport of liquor quantum of sentence

State of U.P. v. Mahesh Narain

06 Mar 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that promotion eligibility under service rules must be determined from the date of Gazette publication, and subsequent amendments cannot retrospectively prejudice accrued employee rights.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant promotion eligibility service rules Gazette publication U.P. Forensic Science Laboratories Technical Officers Service Rules

State of Orissa v. M/s Mesco Steels Ltd.

06 Mar 2013 · T.S. Thakur

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition against a provisional government communication is premature and directed the parties to follow due administrative process before challenging final orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant mining lease prematurity of writ petition inter-departmental communication show cause notice

P. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY v. M/S. N.B.C.C. LTD.

05 Mar 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's partial modification of an arbitral award, affirming judicial scrutiny over arbitrators' legal errors and confirming the contractor's entitlement to payments as per DSR-1981 with interest at 12% per annum.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration Act, 1940 Delhi Schedule of Rates 1981 CPWD Manual Interest pendente lite

Vijay Kumar Thakur v. State of Karnataka & Ors.

04 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court directed the State CID, headed by a DGP-ranked officer, to conduct a fair and expeditious investigation into a murder case instead of the CBI, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Article 32 Constitution of India Writ Petition CBI investigation State CID

Voluntary Health Association of Punjab v. Union of India & Others

04 Mar 2013 · Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed stringent enforcement and meaningful awareness measures to curb female foeticide and ensure effective implementation of the PNDT Act, 1994.

constitutional other Significant female foeticide PNDT Act sex-selective abortion pre-natal diagnostic techniques

Laxman Lal v. State of Rajasthan

01 Mar 2013 · R. M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that a declaration under Section 6 made beyond the two-year limit prescribed by the 1981 Amendment Act is invalid and that invocation of urgency powers after seven years without real urgency is unsustainable, thereby quashing the acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 Section 4 notification Section 6 declaration Section 5-A inquiry

K.S. Panduranga v. State of Karnataka

01 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, clarified that criminal appeals can be decided on merits despite absence of counsel if no prejudice is caused, and modified the sentence respecting statutory minimums.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence Section 13(1)(d) offence illegal gratification

Mahalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Ashabhai Atmaram Patel

01 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's order allowing settlement and compounding of suits under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, setting aside the High Court's interference and clarifying the binding effect of power of attorney and limitations on writ jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC compounding of suit power of attorney settlement

Vidya Dhar & Ors. v. Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd.

01 Mar 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain a television broadcast dramatizing a corruption case, holding that post-conviction publicity does not prejudice the right to a fair trial but imposed safeguards to protect the petitioners' identity.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant fair trial prejudicial publicity freedom of speech media broadcast

State of Andhra Pradesh v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

28 Feb 2013 · R.M. Lodha; T.S. Thakur; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that Maharashtra is entitled to construct the Babhali barrage within its territory up to the Pochampad dam site as per the 1975 agreement and GWDT award, dismissing Andhra Pradesh's suit alleging violation.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 Pochampad dam Babhali barrage

Esha Ekta Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai

27 Feb 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the refusal to regularize unauthorized constructions violating sanctioned plans, affirming municipal authority to enforce planning laws and order demolition despite occupancy by flat buyers aware of the illegality.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant illegal construction municipal corporation regularization development control regulations

Lajja Ram v. Union Territory, Chandigarh

27 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that failure to afford a hearing before modifying acquisition reports violates natural justice, rendering the acquisition notification invalid and allowing the writ petition despite delay and post-award challenge where possession was not taken.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 5-A Section 6 notification principles of natural justice

State of Orissa v. Sri Jagabandhu Panda

27 Feb 2013 · M.Y. Eqbal; Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that the post of Ore Dressing Engineer held by the respondent is an ex-cadre post and upheld the Government's authority to determine cadre status and reject the respondent's claim for re-designation and promotion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-cadre post cadre post Ore Dressing Engineer promotion

State of Uttar Pradesh v. M/S. Systematic Conscom Limited

26 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the introduction of State Development Tax is a new tax and not a change in the rate of tax under the composition scheme, invalidating the circular directing its recovery alongside composition money.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 State Development Tax Composition Scheme Section 7-D proviso