Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Dr. K.S. Palanisami v. Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam

07 Jul 2005 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that a joint and mutual Will creating a charitable trust is irrevocable after the death of one testator, and alienations by the survivor in breach of the trust are invalid, upholding the High Court's decree for trust administration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant joint will mutual will charitable trust alienation

Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors. v. S.S. Sheokand & Anr.

16 Mar 2004 · H.L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court upheld quashing of a bank officer's disciplinary punishment due to non-disclosure of CVC material but set aside the High Court's direction for his promotion, emphasizing procedural fairness and independent discretion in disciplinary actions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings Central Vigilance Commission non-disclosure fair opportunity

Kavita Kanwar v. Pamela Mehta & Ors.

20 May 2003 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the denial of probate of a Will due to unexplained suspicious circumstances and failure to prove the testatrix's understanding of its contents.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate Will execution suspicious circumstances testatrix understanding

Pondicherry Khadi and Village Industries Board v. K. Aroquia Radja

26 Mar 2003 · G.S. Singhvi; H.L. Gokhale; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that employees appointed on a co-terminus basis have no right to continue after the appointing authority's tenure ends, and their absorption without following recruitment rules violates constitutional principles.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant co-terminus appointment regularization absorption Articles 14 and 16

SGT Chaman Lal v. Union of India

13 Apr 2002 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld denial of select promotion to an Indian Air Force sergeant placed in a low medical category, holding that exemption under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act applies to Armed Forces and promotion depends on medical fitness criteria.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant medical categorization promotion eligibility Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 47 exemption

Secundrabad Club v. C.I.T.-V

05 Feb 1998 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld that interest earned by clubs on fixed deposits with banks is taxable income, rejecting exemption under the principle of mutuality and affirming the Bangalore Club judgment.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant principle of mutuality income tax interest income fixed deposits

S.K.J. Coke Industries Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd.

12 Mar 1997 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the appellants were not entitled to preferential linked coal pricing and must pay the Liberalised Sales Scheme price as authorized by government notifications and regulatory resolutions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant coal linkage liberalised sales scheme coal pricing Colliery Control Order 1945

The Cosmos Co. Operative Bank Ltd. v. Central Bank of India & Ors.

05 Sep 1994 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 243
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that an unregistered agreement of sale does not create a valid mortgage and affirmed the priority of the Central Bank's earlier mortgage over the appellant bank's subsequent mortgage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant equitable mortgage unregistered agreement of sale priority of mortgage Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Montford Brothers of St. Gabriel v. United India Insurance

14 Jul 1994 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that a charitable society representing a deceased member who renounced family ties is a competent legal representative entitled to claim motor accident compensation, and the insurer cannot raise maintainability objections for the first time in a writ petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 legal representative compensation claim

Jaswant Singh v. Union of India

19 May 1989 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; M. R. Shah
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that denial of legal assistance in a Summary Court Martial violates natural justice and set aside the dismissal and imprisonment of the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Summary Court Martial Rule 129 Army Rules 1954 legal assistance natural justice

Prahlad Sahai v. Haryana Roadways

06 Jul 1984 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 396
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for prosthetic limbs and loss of future income in a motor accident case, establishing a standardized approach for awarding just and reasonable damages including periodic replacement and maintenance costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant prosthetic limb compensation motor accident claim restitution in integrum loss of future income

Equipment Corporation v. Tahsildar & Ors.

27 Nov 1982 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 274

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of possession taken by the State under the Urban Land Ceiling Act through panchanama and held that procedural irregularities did not invalidate acquisition where statutory requirements were substantially complied with.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act Section 10(5) notice Section 10(6) order panchanama

Surendran v. Sub-Inspector of Police

18 Feb 1972 · Ashok Bhushan; Vineet Saran; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rash driving causing injury but modified the sentence from imprisonment to a fine considering the long delay since the offence.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 279 IPC Section 337 IPC Section 338 IPC rash driving

Surendran v. Sub-Inspector of Police

18 Feb 1972 · Ashok Bhushan; Vineet Saran; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rash driving causing injury but converted the imprisonment sentence into a fine due to the long delay since the offence.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 279 IPC Section 337 IPC Section 338 IPC rash driving

ALD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

06 Feb 1970 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 964

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory time limit under Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 for claiming Input Tax Credit, dismissing challenges to its constitutional validity and denying extension of the claim period.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 Section 19(11) Time limit

ALD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

06 Feb 1970 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory time limit under Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 for claiming Input Tax Credit, dismissing constitutional challenges and denying extension of the period by assessing authorities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 Section 19(11) Time limit

ANANT SINGH @ ANANT KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF BIHAR

28 Jan 1968 · R. F. Nariman; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

A preventive detention order passed after revocation must be based on fresh grounds arising post-revocation; otherwise, it is invalid and liable to be set aside.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 Section 23(2) revocation of detention order

HARDEV SINGH v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

03 Feb 1960 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Sub-lessees under a Government lease for agricultural purposes do not acquire independent tenure-holder status under the Ceiling Act without complying with lease conditions, and their land is included in the original lessee's holding for ceiling purposes.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 Government Grants Act, 1895 tenure holder holding

HARDEV SINGH v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

03 Feb 1960 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari

Sub-lessees under a Government lease who fail to comply with lease conditions do not acquire independent tenure holder status under the Uttar Pradesh Ceiling Act, and the original Government lessee remains the real holder for ceiling purposes.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 Government Grants Act, 1895 sub-lease tenure holder

Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri v. State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department

04 Aug 1959 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that revenue authorities cannot declare a registered partition deed executed before the cut-off date as sham and ignore it for land ceiling purposes, restoring the rights of daughters under such partition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 partition deed cut-off date sham partition