Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Shivdev Kaur By Lrs. & Ors. v. R.S. Grewal

20 Mar 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a life interest granted by a Will to a Hindu female does not convert into absolute ownership under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and dismissed the appeal challenging this principle.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14 life interest absolute ownership

Tej Prakash Pathak v. Rajasthan High Court

20 Mar 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that while recruitment criteria generally cannot be changed after the process begins, procedural changes imposing higher standards may be permissible, and referred the issue for authoritative clarification by a larger Bench.

administrative other Significant recruitment rules rules of the game minimum qualifying marks alteration of selection criteria

Subodh Nath and Anr. v. State of Tripura

19 Mar 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court held that a person under 18 years at the time of offence is a juvenile under the 2000 Act and remitted his case to the Juvenile Justice Board, while upholding the conviction of the co-accused based on reliable eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed (appellant no.2), appeal_dismissed (appellant no.1) Significant juvenile justice juvenile definition juvenile justice act 2000 juvenile justice act 1986

RAM CHANDRA VERMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

19 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the life conviction of the appellant for murder based on consistent eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony post-mortem report

Sushil K. Chakravarty v. M/s. Tej Properties Pvt. Ltd.

19 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone delay and validated the ex-parte decree passed without impleading legal heirs under Order XXII Rule 4(4) CPC, emphasizing the necessity of timely substitution and truthful explanations for delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 4(4) CPC ex-parte decree condonation of delay legal representatives substitution

Babu and Anr. v. State rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai

19 Mar 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court upheld murder convictions under Section 302 IPC based on common intention and credible eyewitness evidence, rejecting challenges on unlawful assembly and applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC common intention unlawful assembly

Shantilal Gulabchand Mutha v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd.

18 Mar 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that courts must exercise caution and provide reasons before passing an ex parte decree under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and set aside the impugned decree for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC ex parte decree written statement discretionary power

M/S. PRIME IMPEX LTD. & ORS v. M/S. P.E.C. LTD. & ANR

18 Mar 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that accused persons have a statutory right to be heard before the revisional court under Section 401(2) CrPC when a complaint dismissal order under Section 203 CrPC is challenged, and remanded the case for fresh hearing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 401 CrPC Section 203 CrPC right to be heard natural justice

Indrajit Sureshprasad Bind & Ors. v. State of Gujarat

18 Mar 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to lack of credible evidence of cruelty or harassment and doubts over the authenticity of key prosecution documents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC

Nirmala J. Jhala v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

18 Mar 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside compulsory retirement of a judicial officer due to reliance on inadmissible preliminary enquiry statements and violation of natural justice, emphasizing limited judicial review and protection of honest subordinate judiciary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry standard of proof preliminary enquiry natural justice

Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another v. State of Maharashtra

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that delay in trial does not automatically warrant quashing of criminal proceedings in corruption cases, emphasizing a balanced approach considering accused's conduct and societal interest.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 corruption disproportionate assets

The Union of India v. Anil Kumar Sarkar

15 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that promotion cannot be withheld under the sealed cover procedure unless charge sheet, suspension, or prosecution is pending on the relevant date, and directed promotion of the respondent accordingly.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant sealed cover procedure promotion disciplinary proceedings charge sheet

Kamlendra Singh @ Pappu Singh v. State of M.P.

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of a juvenile accused convicted of attempted murder, setting aside the sentence and directing the case to be dealt with by the Juvenile Justice Board under the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice juvenility claim Section 307 IPC concurrent sentence

Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi

15 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that High Courts have inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in non-compoundable matrimonial offences when parties have amicably settled their disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings non-compoundable offences matrimonial disputes

MD. SHAKIR JAMAL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

15 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld bail and exempted official translation for the appellant in a criminal case involving a minor financial discrepancy of Rs. 2000/- during his tenure as B.D.O.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail official translation exemption audit report discrepancy financial irregularity

C. LATHA & ORS v. M/S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD

15 Mar 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court restored the original compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, setting aside the High Court's reduction of the amount.

civil appeal_allowed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation appeal High Court

Nagendrappa Natikar v. Neelamma

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

A compromise under Section 125 CrPC does not bar a wife from claiming maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, as Section 125 proceedings are summary and do not conclusively determine personal rights.

family petition_dismissed Significant Section 125 CrPC Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act maintenance claim

State of U.P. v. Satpal

15 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the State of U.P. against Satpal, holding that the judgment in a related civil appeal governs the present case.

civil appeal_dismissed Supreme Court civil appeal precedent binding judgment

State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.

14 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

Confessional statements made by accused in a separate case are inadmissible against others not jointly tried, and witnesses recording such confessions cannot be summoned as defense witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confession admissibility Indian Evidence Act Sections 24, 25, 26, 30 MCOCA hearsay rule

Satya Pal v. State of Haryana & Anr.

13 Mar 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld conviction for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, affirming the statutory presumption of dowry-related harassment and rejecting the appellant's defense due to failure to rebut with credible evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 113B Indian Evidence Act delay in lodging FIR