Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Sandeep Kumar Chourasia v. Divisional Manager, New India Insurance Company Ltd.

02 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's insurance claim for loss of vision caused by an accidental fall, holding that medical evidence supported causation and directed compensation with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant accidental injury insurance claim loss of vision Phthisis Bulbi

Chairman, Rushikulya Gramya Bank v. Bisawamber Patro

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of prescribing minimum qualifying marks as a benchmark in seniority-cum-merit promotions by a Regional Rural Bank, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority-cum-merit minimum qualifying marks benchmark

Union of India v. Ex-GNR Ajeet Singh

02 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that GCM proceedings are not wholly vitiated by offences committed as a juvenile and allowed the appeal restoring conviction but reducing sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 General Court Martial Army Act, 1950 Army Rules, 1954

Reshma Kumari v. Madan Mohan

02 Apr 2013 · R. M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 5 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court clarified that the multiplier in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is a guide, not a binding rule, for compensation under Section 166, and approved a standardized method for selecting multipliers and calculating compensation to ensure fairness and uniformity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A Section 166 Second Schedule

State of Uttarakhand v. Kumari Amita Singh

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; H.L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court set aside the Uttarakhand High Court's brief order invalidating a state-specific registration requirement for veterinary posts and remanded the matter for detailed constitutional and statutory consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 16 equality of opportunity public employment Veterinary Council registration

Subal Ghorai & Ors. v. State of West Bengal

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 9 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC, affirming that all members of an unlawful assembly sharing the common object are liable for offences committed by any member, while emphasizing the need for prudence to avoid wrongful convictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object constructive liability

State of Haryana v. Basti Ram

02 Apr 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acquittal in a rape case for ignoring the prosecutrix's credible testimony and remanded the matter for reconsideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony Section 164 Cr.P.C. sole testimony

Abdul Nasar Adam Ismail v. State of Maharashtra

02 Apr 2013 · T. S. Thakur; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the detention order under COFEPOSA but quashed the continued detention due to unexplained delay in disposal of the detenu's representation, directing his release.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution of India COFEPOSA Act 1974 delay in representation disposal

M/s. Usha Stud and Agricultural Farms Private Limited and others v. State of Haryana and others

02 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Kurian Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the land acquisition declaration due to non-application of mind and discrimination, emphasizing mandatory compliance with Section 5-A and equality under Article 14.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 5-A Section 6(1) Article 14

K.R.J. Sarma v. R.V. Surya Rao

01 Apr 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a suicide case where the deceased's suicide note absolved him and there was no evidence of cruelty or abetment under Sections 306 and 498A IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC cruelty Section 498A IPC

Bangalore Development Authority v. M/s Vijaya Leasing Ltd.

01 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s power under Article 226 to strike down an illegal de-notification of land acquisition, emphasizing judicial intervention to correct manifest injustice and uphold lawful possession.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Land Acquisition Act de-notification possession

Shrirampur Municipal Council v. Satyabhamabai Bhimaji Dawkher

01 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that land reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act lapses if acquisition proceedings are not commenced within six months of a purchase notice, and mere administrative steps do not suffice to prevent lapsing.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 127 land reservation lapsing land acquisition

Purushottam Meena v. State of Bihar & Anr.

22 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court granted and made absolute anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC to the appellant, protecting him from arrest subject to conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC protection from arrest criminal appeal

M/s. Deep Trading Company v. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation

22 Mar 2013 · R.M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that a party forfeits its right to appoint an arbitrator if it fails to do so within thirty days of demand and an application under Section 11(6) is filed, mandating the Chief Justice to appoint an arbitrator irrespective of any subsequent appointment by the defaulting party.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Forfeiture of right

Narinder Singh Rao v. Avm Mahinder Singh Rao

22 Mar 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Will bequeathing only the testator's share in intestate property, dismissing claims to full ownership and affirming the appellant's 2/9th share in the suit property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant validity of Will Hindu Succession Act intestate succession property inheritance

Prakash v. State of Rajasthan

22 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar · (2013) 4 SCC 116

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for kidnapping and murdering a child, affirming that the circumstantial evidence met the stringent legal standards for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence five golden principles last seen theory motive

Sardari Lal v. Chairman, Managing Committee

22 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded for premature termination of service from Rs. 3 lakh to Rs. 7.5 lakh, declining reinstatement but ensuring adequate monetary relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation reinstatement service termination lump sum award

Margaret Almeida & Ors. v. Bombay Catholic Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

22 Mar 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed tenant-members' appeals challenging redevelopment of cooperative society land, holding that redevelopment resolutions upheld by prior final orders cannot be obstructed by a minority, and tenant-members retain membership rights post redevelopment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Cooperative Societies Act bifurcation tenant-members redevelopment

Umesh Singh v. State of Bihar

22 Mar 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible ocular evidence despite discrepancies in medical evidence and FIR registration issues, affirming the concurrent findings of lower courts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC FIR registration ocular evidence medical evidence

Dayanand Anglo Vedic College Trust and Management Society v. State of Maharashtra & Anr

22 Mar 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that linguistic minority status under Article 30 must be determined by the minority status of the institution's founders and administrators within the State, and upheld withdrawal of such status where trustees reside outside the State.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 30 linguistic minority minority educational institution trustees residence