Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Ramesh Kumar Soni v. State of Madhya Pradesh

26 Feb 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh amendment shifting trial of certain offences to the Sessions Court operates retrospectively, and the appellant must be tried by the Sessions Court as no case was instituted before the Magistrate prior to the amendment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant forum of trial retrospective amendment procedural law Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment

Padmalayan v. Sarasan

25 Feb 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellants by permitting compounding of offences under Section 320 CrPC, setting aside their conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed compounding of offences Section 320 CrPC conviction set aside acquittal

Som Raj @ Soma v. State of H.P.

22 Feb 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC where the accused inflicted a fatal blow with a deadly weapon, establishing intent to cause death despite absence of premeditation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder culpable homicide darat

M/s Bagai Construction Thr. v. M/s Gupta Building Material Store

22 Feb 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that courts should not permit belated production of documents or recall of witnesses after conclusion of evidence and arguments unless sufficient cause is shown, emphasizing sparing exercise of inherent powers to ensure expeditious and fair trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 14 CPC Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Section 151 CPC recall of witness

State of Kerala v. Sneha Cheriyan

22 Feb 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Kerala Government Orders requiring a minimum continuous service of one academic year for teachers to claim re-appointment preference under Rule 51A, thereby curbing misuse of short-term appointments in aided schools.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Education Rules Rule 51A Rule 7A aided schools

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar v. State of Gujarat

22 Feb 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed bail for accused involved in manufacturing and distributing poisonous liquor causing multiple deaths, emphasizing the gravity of offence and denying bail to a prime conspirator with criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail hooch tragedy methyl alcohol criminal conspiracy

State of Kerala v. Kandath Distilleries

22 Feb 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the State's discretionary power to grant liquor licences is not a legal duty and the High Court cannot compel grant of such licence by writ of mandamus.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Writ of Mandamus Discretionary power Liquor licence Abkari Act

K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa

22 Feb 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that repeated false complaints and defamatory allegations by a spouse constitute mental cruelty warranting divorce and emphasized mediation in matrimonial disputes.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 498-A IPC divorce

A.S. Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

21 Feb 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a toll collection contract and forfeiture of performance security for breach, while ruling that invocation of the bank guarantee without proper estimation was unjustified, affirming flexible application of natural justice principles in administrative contract termination.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant natural justice termination of contract performance security bank guarantee

Bijender Singh v. State of Haryana

21 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of five accused for double murder, rejecting the plea of private defense and the application of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, emphasizing that acquittal of some co-accused does not automatically acquit others when evidence against them is credible.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant double murder right of private defense falsus in uno falsus in omnibus conviction

Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders & Investors P.Ltd.

21 Feb 2013 · M.Y. Eqbal; T.S. Thakur

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser with notice of a prior agreement and injunction is a necessary party in a suit for specific performance and can be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, subject to the doctrine of lis pendens and Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance impleadment Order 1 Rule 10 CPC lis pendens

The State of A.P. v. M/s. Star Bone Mill & Fertiliser Co.

21 Feb 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a sale deed executed by a lessee without title is invalid, set aside the lower courts' judgments, and dismissed the respondent's suit for title over government land.

property appeal_allowed Significant title dispute lease deed sale deed Section 90 Evidence Act

State of Assam v. Ripa Sarma

20 Feb 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Assam's Special Leave Petition challenging the dismissal of its review petition, holding that such petitions are not maintainable without challenging the original judgment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Special Leave Petition Review Petition Maintainability Order 47 Rule 7 CPC

Mata Prasad Mathur v. Jwala Prasad Mathur

20 Feb 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that failure to substitute legal representatives of a deceased non-contesting defendant does not cause abatement of the suit under Order XXII Rule 4(4) CPC, and the suit must proceed on merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 4(4) CPC substitution of legal representatives abatement of suit ex parte defendant

Yasihey Yobin & Anr. v. The Department of Customs, Shillong

20 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under the NDPS Act, clarified the scope of Sections 50 and 42 regarding search procedures, and reduced the sentence of one appellant on humanitarian grounds.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 50 Section 42 search and seizure

R. Mahalingam v. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission

20 Feb 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court quashed the removal order of a government servant found to have been officially appointed as invigilator during leave and not involved in examination misconduct, emphasizing limited judicial interference in disciplinary matters and adherence to natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry unauthorized absence invigilation duty question paper leakage

Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. v. Partha Sarathi Sen Roy

20 Feb 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd., a government company under deep and pervasive government control, is a State under Article 12 and amenable to writ jurisdiction, and struck down its arbitrary termination clause as violative of Article 14.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India State instrumentality writ jurisdiction government company

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. REENA DEVI

20 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's liability to compensate accident victims, rejecting claims of overloading unsupported by evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor vehicle accident insurance liability overloading compensation

Sunil Mehta v. State of Gujarat

20 Feb 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that evidence recorded before the accused's appearance under Section 202 Cr.P.C. cannot be used for framing charges under Section 246 Cr.P.C., affirming the accused's right to cross-examine prosecution witnesses before charges are framed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 244 Cr.P.C. Section 202 Cr.P.C. framing of charges right to cross-examination

State of Rajasthan v. Sanjay

19 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to contradictions in key prosecution witnesses' evidence, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed last seen theory contradiction in witness testimony Section 302 IPC murder trial