Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

P. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY v. M/S. N.B.C.C. LTD.

05 Mar 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's partial modification of an arbitral award, affirming judicial scrutiny over arbitrators' legal errors and confirming the contractor's entitlement to payments as per DSR-1981 with interest at 12% per annum.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration Act, 1940 Delhi Schedule of Rates 1981 CPWD Manual Interest pendente lite

Vijay Kumar Thakur v. State of Karnataka & Ors.

04 Mar 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court directed the State CID, headed by a DGP-ranked officer, to conduct a fair and expeditious investigation into a murder case instead of the CBI, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Article 32 Constitution of India Writ Petition CBI investigation State CID

Voluntary Health Association of Punjab v. Union of India & Others

04 Mar 2013 · Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed stringent enforcement and meaningful awareness measures to curb female foeticide and ensure effective implementation of the PNDT Act, 1994.

constitutional other Significant female foeticide PNDT Act sex-selective abortion pre-natal diagnostic techniques

Laxman Lal v. State of Rajasthan

01 Mar 2013 · R. M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that a declaration under Section 6 made beyond the two-year limit prescribed by the 1981 Amendment Act is invalid and that invocation of urgency powers after seven years without real urgency is unsustainable, thereby quashing the acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 Section 4 notification Section 6 declaration Section 5-A inquiry

K.S. Panduranga v. State of Karnataka

01 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, clarified that criminal appeals can be decided on merits despite absence of counsel if no prejudice is caused, and modified the sentence respecting statutory minimums.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence Section 13(1)(d) offence illegal gratification

Mahalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Ashabhai Atmaram Patel

01 Mar 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's order allowing settlement and compounding of suits under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, setting aside the High Court's interference and clarifying the binding effect of power of attorney and limitations on writ jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC compounding of suit power of attorney settlement

Vidya Dhar & Ors. v. Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd.

01 Mar 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain a television broadcast dramatizing a corruption case, holding that post-conviction publicity does not prejudice the right to a fair trial but imposed safeguards to protect the petitioners' identity.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant fair trial prejudicial publicity freedom of speech media broadcast

State of Andhra Pradesh v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

28 Feb 2013 · R.M. Lodha; T.S. Thakur; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that Maharashtra is entitled to construct the Babhali barrage within its territory up to the Pochampad dam site as per the 1975 agreement and GWDT award, dismissing Andhra Pradesh's suit alleging violation.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 Pochampad dam Babhali barrage

Esha Ekta Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai

27 Feb 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the refusal to regularize unauthorized constructions violating sanctioned plans, affirming municipal authority to enforce planning laws and order demolition despite occupancy by flat buyers aware of the illegality.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant illegal construction municipal corporation regularization development control regulations

Lajja Ram v. Union Territory, Chandigarh

27 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that failure to afford a hearing before modifying acquisition reports violates natural justice, rendering the acquisition notification invalid and allowing the writ petition despite delay and post-award challenge where possession was not taken.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 5-A Section 6 notification principles of natural justice

State of Orissa v. Sri Jagabandhu Panda

27 Feb 2013 · M.Y. Eqbal; Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that the post of Ore Dressing Engineer held by the respondent is an ex-cadre post and upheld the Government's authority to determine cadre status and reject the respondent's claim for re-designation and promotion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-cadre post cadre post Ore Dressing Engineer promotion

State of Uttar Pradesh v. M/S. Systematic Conscom Limited

26 Feb 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the introduction of State Development Tax is a new tax and not a change in the rate of tax under the composition scheme, invalidating the circular directing its recovery alongside composition money.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 State Development Tax Composition Scheme Section 7-D proviso

Ramesh Kumar Soni v. State of Madhya Pradesh

26 Feb 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh amendment shifting trial of certain offences to the Sessions Court operates retrospectively, and the appellant must be tried by the Sessions Court as no case was instituted before the Magistrate prior to the amendment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant forum of trial retrospective amendment procedural law Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment

Padmalayan v. Sarasan

25 Feb 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellants by permitting compounding of offences under Section 320 CrPC, setting aside their conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed compounding of offences Section 320 CrPC conviction set aside acquittal

Som Raj @ Soma v. State of H.P.

22 Feb 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC where the accused inflicted a fatal blow with a deadly weapon, establishing intent to cause death despite absence of premeditation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder culpable homicide darat

M/s Bagai Construction Thr. v. M/s Gupta Building Material Store

22 Feb 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that courts should not permit belated production of documents or recall of witnesses after conclusion of evidence and arguments unless sufficient cause is shown, emphasizing sparing exercise of inherent powers to ensure expeditious and fair trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 14 CPC Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Section 151 CPC recall of witness

State of Kerala v. Sneha Cheriyan

22 Feb 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Kerala Government Orders requiring a minimum continuous service of one academic year for teachers to claim re-appointment preference under Rule 51A, thereby curbing misuse of short-term appointments in aided schools.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Education Rules Rule 51A Rule 7A aided schools

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar v. State of Gujarat

22 Feb 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed bail for accused involved in manufacturing and distributing poisonous liquor causing multiple deaths, emphasizing the gravity of offence and denying bail to a prime conspirator with criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail hooch tragedy methyl alcohol criminal conspiracy

State of Kerala v. Kandath Distilleries

22 Feb 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the State's discretionary power to grant liquor licences is not a legal duty and the High Court cannot compel grant of such licence by writ of mandamus.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Writ of Mandamus Discretionary power Liquor licence Abkari Act

K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa

22 Feb 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that repeated false complaints and defamatory allegations by a spouse constitute mental cruelty warranting divorce and emphasized mediation in matrimonial disputes.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 498-A IPC divorce