Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. GENERAL SECRETARY, MYSORE DIVISION INDUSTRIAL WORKERS GENERAL UNION

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the priority of adjudicated workmen's statutory dues over the claims of a State Financial Corporation under its enabling Act, dismissing the Corporation's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Payment of Gratuity Act Section 529 Companies Act, 1956

DIVISIONAL LOGGING MANAGER, U.P. FOREST CORPORATION v. SURENDER SINGH

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court and High Court decisions that the respondent's termination was illegal due to the late retrenchment notice and ordered reinstatement with back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant termination retrenchment notice industrial dispute continuous service

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Rama Chandrashekhar Vaidya

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the lessee exhausted its statutory renewal right under section 5(2) of the Burmah Shell Act and cannot claim further renewal without a fresh registered lease, dismissing the appeal and upholding eviction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease renewal Burmah Shell Act 1976 section 5(2) contractual renewal clause

Baleshwar Rajbanshi v. Board of Trustees for Port Trust of Calcutta

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a notification prohibiting contract labour for railway track works at Kolkata Port Trust and set aside the High Court's exception allowing assignment to RITES.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 Section 10(1) notification perennial nature of work Kolkata Port Trust

Mohd. Yousuf v. Director General of Fire Services, A. P.

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that an ex-parte departmental enquiry without proper notice and opportunity to defend is invalid, set aside the High Court’s order, and restored the Administrative Tribunal’s quashing of the appellant’s dismissal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice ex-parte enquiry dismissal from service

Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Union of India

02 Apr 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; H. L. Gokhale · (2013) 6 SCC 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Sterlite Industries, holding that environmental clearances and consents granted were valid despite absence of public hearing and location within 25 km of ecologically sensitive areas, and set aside the High Court's order directing closure of the plant.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental clearance EIA notification 1994 Public hearing TNPCB consent order

National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Tuncay Alankus & Anr.

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petition against Tuncay Alankus, holding that there was no proof beyond reasonable doubt that he violated the Court’s restraining orders by withdrawing money from his Swiss bank account.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court Swiss bank account interim restraining order burden of proof

Kulwant Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab

02 Apr 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC for dowry death, rejecting delay and improvement in prosecution case arguments and affirming the mandatory minimum sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC harassment for dowry

Sandeep Kumar Chourasia v. Divisional Manager, New India Insurance Company Ltd.

02 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's insurance claim for loss of vision caused by an accidental fall, holding that medical evidence supported causation and directed compensation with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant accidental injury insurance claim loss of vision Phthisis Bulbi

Chairman, Rushikulya Gramya Bank v. Bisawamber Patro

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of prescribing minimum qualifying marks as a benchmark in seniority-cum-merit promotions by a Regional Rural Bank, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority-cum-merit minimum qualifying marks benchmark

Union of India v. Ex-GNR Ajeet Singh

02 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that GCM proceedings are not wholly vitiated by offences committed as a juvenile and allowed the appeal restoring conviction but reducing sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 General Court Martial Army Act, 1950 Army Rules, 1954

Reshma Kumari v. Madan Mohan

02 Apr 2013 · R. M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that the multiplier in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is a guide, not a binding rule, for compensation under Section 166, and approved a standardized method for selecting multipliers and calculating compensation to ensure fairness and uniformity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A Section 166 Second Schedule

State of Uttarakhand v. Kumari Amita Singh

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; H.L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court set aside the Uttarakhand High Court's brief order invalidating a state-specific registration requirement for veterinary posts and remanded the matter for detailed constitutional and statutory consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 16 equality of opportunity public employment Veterinary Council registration

Subal Ghorai & Ors. v. State of West Bengal

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 9 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC, affirming that all members of an unlawful assembly sharing the common object are liable for offences committed by any member, while emphasizing the need for prudence to avoid wrongful convictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object constructive liability

State of Haryana v. Basti Ram

02 Apr 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acquittal in a rape case for ignoring the prosecutrix's credible testimony and remanded the matter for reconsideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony Section 164 Cr.P.C. sole testimony

Abdul Nasar Adam Ismail v. State of Maharashtra

02 Apr 2013 · T. S. Thakur; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the detention order under COFEPOSA but quashed the continued detention due to unexplained delay in disposal of the detenu's representation, directing his release.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution of India COFEPOSA Act 1974 delay in representation disposal

M/s. Usha Stud and Agricultural Farms Private Limited and others v. State of Haryana and others

02 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Kurian Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the land acquisition declaration due to non-application of mind and discrimination, emphasizing mandatory compliance with Section 5-A and equality under Article 14.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 5-A Section 6(1) Article 14

K.R.J. Sarma v. R.V. Surya Rao

01 Apr 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a suicide case where the deceased's suicide note absolved him and there was no evidence of cruelty or abetment under Sections 306 and 498A IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC cruelty Section 498A IPC

Bangalore Development Authority v. M/s Vijaya Leasing Ltd.

01 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s power under Article 226 to strike down an illegal de-notification of land acquisition, emphasizing judicial intervention to correct manifest injustice and uphold lawful possession.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Land Acquisition Act de-notification possession

Shrirampur Municipal Council v. Satyabhamabai Bhimaji Dawkher

01 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that land reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act lapses if acquisition proceedings are not commenced within six months of a purchase notice, and mere administrative steps do not suffice to prevent lapsing.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 127 land reservation lapsing land acquisition