Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Rakesh Bhatnagar v. Union of India

08 Apr 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court set aside a non-speaking order dismissing a Writ Petition without reasons and remanded the matter for fresh disposal with reasoned judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant non-speaking order compulsory retirement disciplinary proceedings writ petition

Mahadeo v. State of U.P.

08 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that once land is validly acquired and possession taken under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, it vests in the State and cannot be withdrawn or reconveyed by internal resolutions, dismissing the appellants' challenge to acquisition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 16 Section 48 possession

Syed Yousuf Hussain v. State of Andhra Pradesh

05 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for demanding and accepting illegal gratification, holding that his presence and conduct established common intention under Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 34 IPC common intention illegal gratification

Bhanwar Kanwar v. R.K. Gupta & Anr.

05 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for unfair trade practice by an unauthorized practitioner prescribing allopathic medicines, rejecting retrospective validation and setting aside partial deposit of compensation in legal aid account.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant unfair trade practice medical negligence consumer protection allopathic medicine prescription

Aspi Jal v. Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor

05 Apr 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that Section 10 CPC does not mandate stay of a subsequent eviction suit when the subject matter differs by reason of different causes of action or periods of non-user, allowing the third suit to proceed independently.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 10 CPC stay of suit res judicata non-user

Sooguru Subrahmanyam v. State of A.P.

04 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC homicidal death motive

Khachar Dipu @ Dilipbhai Nakubhai v. State of Gujarat

04 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conversion of conviction from culpable homicide not amounting to murder to murder under Section 302 IPC based on evidence of intentional infliction of fatal injuries by the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC murder culpable homicide

State of Maharashtra v. Bhakti Vedanta Book Trust

04 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court held that failure to take valid acquisition steps within six months of a purchase notice under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act causes land reservation to lapse, making rejection of building plans on reservation grounds unsustainable.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 126 Section 127 land reservation

Bhagwati Developers Private Ltd. v. The Peerless General Finance Investment Company Limited & Ors.

04 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a Company Petition filed with requisite shareholder consent is maintainable in representative capacity despite withdrawal of original petitioners, allowing the appellant's appeal and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 397 Section 398 Company Petition

Ramesh Chandra Shah v. Anil Joshi

03 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that candidates who participate in a recruitment process with full knowledge of the applicable rules waive their right to challenge the selection procedure later, and upheld the validity of the selection conducted under the General Rules over conflicting Special Rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant waiver selection process recruitment rules non obstante clause

Chief Administrator, Housing Board Haryana v. Diwan Chand

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that an employee with over 240 days of service cannot be terminated without due procedure under Section 25-F, but substituted reinstatement with compensation due to the short service period.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 25-F Industrial Disputes Act termination of service reinstatement compensation

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Nanak Chand

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court directed the Delhi High Court to expeditiously decide pending writ petitions challenging Labour Court awards on employee reinstatement and wages, maintaining interim relief but emphasizing timely adjudication.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Labour Court award interim order reinstatement back wages

KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. GENERAL SECRETARY, MYSORE DIVISION INDUSTRIAL WORKERS GENERAL UNION

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the priority of adjudicated workmen's statutory dues over the claims of a State Financial Corporation under its enabling Act, dismissing the Corporation's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Payment of Gratuity Act Section 529 Companies Act, 1956

DIVISIONAL LOGGING MANAGER, U.P. FOREST CORPORATION v. SURENDER SINGH

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court and High Court decisions that the respondent's termination was illegal due to the late retrenchment notice and ordered reinstatement with back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant termination retrenchment notice industrial dispute continuous service

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Rama Chandrashekhar Vaidya

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the lessee exhausted its statutory renewal right under section 5(2) of the Burmah Shell Act and cannot claim further renewal without a fresh registered lease, dismissing the appeal and upholding eviction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease renewal Burmah Shell Act 1976 section 5(2) contractual renewal clause

Baleshwar Rajbanshi v. Board of Trustees for Port Trust of Calcutta

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a notification prohibiting contract labour for railway track works at Kolkata Port Trust and set aside the High Court's exception allowing assignment to RITES.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 Section 10(1) notification perennial nature of work Kolkata Port Trust

Mohd. Yousuf v. Director General of Fire Services, A. P.

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that an ex-parte departmental enquiry without proper notice and opportunity to defend is invalid, set aside the High Court’s order, and restored the Administrative Tribunal’s quashing of the appellant’s dismissal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice ex-parte enquiry dismissal from service

Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Union of India

02 Apr 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; H. L. Gokhale · (2013) 6 SCC 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Sterlite Industries, holding that environmental clearances and consents granted were valid despite absence of public hearing and location within 25 km of ecologically sensitive areas, and set aside the High Court's order directing closure of the plant.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental clearance EIA notification 1994 Public hearing TNPCB consent order

National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Tuncay Alankus & Anr.

02 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petition against Tuncay Alankus, holding that there was no proof beyond reasonable doubt that he violated the Court’s restraining orders by withdrawing money from his Swiss bank account.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court Swiss bank account interim restraining order burden of proof

Kulwant Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab

02 Apr 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC for dowry death, rejecting delay and improvement in prosecution case arguments and affirming the mandatory minimum sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC harassment for dowry