Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Dhrup Singh and others v. State of Bihar

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the Magistrate's power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon persons named in the FIR but not charge-sheeted, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summons to non-charge-sheeted accused Magistrate's cognizance prima facie evidence

Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

08 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Dr. B. S. Chauhan

The Supreme Court held that a second FIR and charge sheet relating to offences arising from the same conspiracy are impermissible and must be treated as supplementary to the first FIR, safeguarding the accused's fundamental rights and ensuring a unified trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Second FIR Supplementary charge sheet Same transaction Criminal conspiracy

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Yashwant Singh Negi

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a Special Leave Petition against the dismissal of a review petition is not maintainable unless the original order is challenged, as the doctrine of merger does not apply to dismissed review petitions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Special Leave Petition Review Petition Doctrine of Merger Maintainability

State of U.P. v. Hari Ram

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed multiple Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of U.P. against Sant Lal, affirming the binding precedent set in State of U.P. v. Hari Ram.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Special Leave Petition State of Uttar Pradesh binding precedent stare decisis

Mohinder v. State of Haryana

08 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence for possession of commercial quantity of opium, affirming statutory presumptions and rejecting procedural and evidentiary challenges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 18 NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act Section 54 NDPS Act

Lal Bahadur & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)

08 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for murder and related offences in 1984 communal riots, ruling that minor contradictions and delays do not vitiate credible eyewitness evidence in riot cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant communal riots delay in FIR eyewitness testimony murder without dead body

B.T. Krishnamurthy v. Sri Basaveswara Education Society

08 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that a temporary lecturer without formal appointment does not acquire a right to regularization or reinstatement, setting aside earlier orders directing such relief.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of service temporary employment appointment letter termination without notice

State of U.P. v. Ram Swaroop

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by the State of U.P. against Ram Swaroop, relying on its prior decision in State of U.P. v. Hari Ram.

civil appeal_dismissed Special Leave Petition Supreme Court stare decisis precedent

Rakesh Bhatnagar v. Union of India

08 Apr 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court set aside a non-speaking order dismissing a Writ Petition without reasons and remanded the matter for fresh disposal with reasoned judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant non-speaking order compulsory retirement disciplinary proceedings writ petition

Mahadeo v. State of U.P.

08 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that once land is validly acquired and possession taken under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, it vests in the State and cannot be withdrawn or reconveyed by internal resolutions, dismissing the appellants' challenge to acquisition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 16 Section 48 possession

Syed Yousuf Hussain v. State of Andhra Pradesh

05 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for demanding and accepting illegal gratification, holding that his presence and conduct established common intention under Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 34 IPC common intention illegal gratification

Bhanwar Kanwar v. R.K. Gupta & Anr.

05 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for unfair trade practice by an unauthorized practitioner prescribing allopathic medicines, rejecting retrospective validation and setting aside partial deposit of compensation in legal aid account.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant unfair trade practice medical negligence consumer protection allopathic medicine prescription

Aspi Jal v. Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor

05 Apr 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that Section 10 CPC does not mandate stay of a subsequent eviction suit when the subject matter differs by reason of different causes of action or periods of non-user, allowing the third suit to proceed independently.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 10 CPC stay of suit res judicata non-user

Sooguru Subrahmanyam v. State of A.P.

04 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC homicidal death motive

Khachar Dipu @ Dilipbhai Nakubhai v. State of Gujarat

04 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conversion of conviction from culpable homicide not amounting to murder to murder under Section 302 IPC based on evidence of intentional infliction of fatal injuries by the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC murder culpable homicide

State of Maharashtra v. Bhakti Vedanta Book Trust

04 Apr 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court held that failure to take valid acquisition steps within six months of a purchase notice under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act causes land reservation to lapse, making rejection of building plans on reservation grounds unsustainable.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 126 Section 127 land reservation

Bhagwati Developers Private Ltd. v. The Peerless General Finance Investment Company Limited & Ors.

04 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a Company Petition filed with requisite shareholder consent is maintainable in representative capacity despite withdrawal of original petitioners, allowing the appellant's appeal and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 397 Section 398 Company Petition

Ramesh Chandra Shah v. Anil Joshi

03 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that candidates who participate in a recruitment process with full knowledge of the applicable rules waive their right to challenge the selection procedure later, and upheld the validity of the selection conducted under the General Rules over conflicting Special Rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant waiver selection process recruitment rules non obstante clause

Chief Administrator, Housing Board Haryana v. Diwan Chand

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that an employee with over 240 days of service cannot be terminated without due procedure under Section 25-F, but substituted reinstatement with compensation due to the short service period.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 25-F Industrial Disputes Act termination of service reinstatement compensation

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Nanak Chand

03 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court directed the Delhi High Court to expeditiously decide pending writ petitions challenging Labour Court awards on employee reinstatement and wages, maintaining interim relief but emphasizing timely adjudication.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Labour Court award interim order reinstatement back wages