Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Venkataraja & Ors. v. Vidyane Doureradjaperumal & Ors.

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a suit for declaration of title without seeking possession relief is not maintainable when defendants are in possession, and a Hindu widow with only life estate cannot alienate absolute title under French Hindu Law.

property appeal_dismissed Significant life estate absolute title declaratory suit consequential relief

V.K. Surendra v. V.K. Thimmaiah & Ors.

10 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld that suit schedule properties are joint family properties and a Will partitioning them without co-parceners' consent is invalid, confirming shares accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint family property self-acquired property Hindu coparcenary partition

Swaroop Singh v. State of M.P.

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape based on the credible testimony of the prosecutrix alone, emphasizing that corroboration is not mandatory and medical evidence is not conclusive in such cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration Section 376 IPC

Kailash @ Tanti Banjara v. State of Madhya Pradesh

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 376 IPC, holding that sexual intercourse with a girl below 16 years is an offence irrespective of consent, based on reliable medical age determination.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 376 IPC rape age determination consent

Rushi Guman Singh v. State of Orissa & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of retrospective deemed suspension under Rule 12(4) of the Orissa Civil Services Rules when a removal order is set aside by a court and further inquiry is ordered.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deemed suspension Orissa Civil Services (CCA) Rules Rule 12(4) removal from service

Sunil Kundu v. State of Jharkhand

09 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants of murder charges due to irreconcilable inconsistencies between ocular and medical evidence and serious investigative lapses, granting them benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC firearm injury medical evidence ocular testimony

Manoj H. Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the removal of an atomic power plant employee for unauthorized press disclosure, rejecting his whistleblower claim and finding the punishment proportionate.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings whistleblower confidentiality proportionality of punishment

P. Thiagarajan v. Rajam Sreerangum & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal by recording an amicable settlement arrived at through mediation during the pendency of the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural civil appeal amicable settlement mediation Mediator's report

Sarva UP Gramin Bank & Ors. v. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; H.L. Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of Circulars excluding RRB employees from promotion consideration based on prior penalties or adverse ratings, affirming that such exclusions are ultra vires the statutory promotion rules and that merit assessment including disciplinary records must be conducted by the selection committee.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Regional Rural Banks Promotion Seniority-cum-merit Disciplinary penalties

KRANTI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

09 Apr 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to fully comply with its earlier orders on Tsunami rehabilitation in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, mandating timely allotment of shelters, compensation, AAY cards, and infrastructure development.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tsunami rehabilitation shelter allotment Lok Adalat awards Antyodaya Anna Yojana

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Another v. Satya Prakash

09 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act does not invalidate a dismissal if misconduct is proved on merits in a complaint under Section 33A.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2)(b) Section 33A dismissal

Lillu @ Rajesh v. State of Haryana

09 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a minor's rapist, rejecting the two-finger test as a basis to infer consent and affirming the prosecutrix's testimony as sufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix age two-finger test consent

Dhrup Singh and others v. State of Bihar

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the Magistrate's power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon persons named in the FIR but not charge-sheeted, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summons to non-charge-sheeted accused Magistrate's cognizance prima facie evidence

Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

08 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Dr. B. S. Chauhan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a second FIR and charge sheet relating to offences arising from the same conspiracy are impermissible and must be treated as supplementary to the first FIR, safeguarding the accused's fundamental rights and ensuring a unified trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Second FIR Supplementary charge sheet Same transaction Criminal conspiracy

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Yashwant Singh Negi

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a Special Leave Petition against the dismissal of a review petition is not maintainable unless the original order is challenged, as the doctrine of merger does not apply to dismissed review petitions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Special Leave Petition Review Petition Doctrine of Merger Maintainability

State of U.P. v. Hari Ram

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed multiple Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of U.P. against Sant Lal, affirming the binding precedent set in State of U.P. v. Hari Ram.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Special Leave Petition State of Uttar Pradesh binding precedent stare decisis

Mohinder v. State of Haryana

08 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence for possession of commercial quantity of opium, affirming statutory presumptions and rejecting procedural and evidentiary challenges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 18 NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act Section 54 NDPS Act

Lal Bahadur & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)

08 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for murder and related offences in 1984 communal riots, ruling that minor contradictions and delays do not vitiate credible eyewitness evidence in riot cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant communal riots delay in FIR eyewitness testimony murder without dead body

B.T. Krishnamurthy v. Sri Basaveswara Education Society

08 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that a temporary lecturer without formal appointment does not acquire a right to regularization or reinstatement, setting aside earlier orders directing such relief.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of service temporary employment appointment letter termination without notice

State of U.P. v. Ram Swaroop

08 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by the State of U.P. against Ram Swaroop, relying on its prior decision in State of U.P. v. Hari Ram.

civil appeal_dismissed Special Leave Petition Supreme Court stare decisis precedent