Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SARVPRIYA SEHKARI AVAS SAMITI LTD.

11 Apr 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that the Khodaiji Committee recommendations and the Government Order dated 22nd October 2002 do not apply to NOIDA or housing societies registered after 1976, setting aside the High Court’s orders directing NOIDA to extend such benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Khodaiji Committee Government Order 22nd October 2002 New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976

Tejinder Singh @ Kaka v. State of Punjab

11 Apr 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court set aside convictions for murder and related offences due to major discrepancies in prosecution evidence and unreliable extra-judicial confessions, emphasizing the benefit of reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extra-judicial confession reasonable doubt Section 201 IPC disappearance of evidence

Rajendra Singh v. State of Uttaranchal

11 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, ruling that minor discrepancies in witness testimonies do not undermine the core reliable evidence corroborated by medical and recovery evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder ocular evidence medical evidence

Shabir Ahmed Teli v. State of Jammu & Kashmir

11 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; R. M. Lodha

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under section 302 RPC based on reliable eyewitness evidence despite investigative lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Ranbir Penal Code section 302 eyewitness testimony

Mohan Lal & Anr v. State of Punjab

11 Apr 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of teachers for gang rape of a student, emphasizing the applicability of Section 114-A Evidence Act, the duty of speedy trial, and the aggravated breach of trust by teachers.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 114-A Indian Evidence Act Section 376(2)(g) IPC Section 309(1) CrPC speedy trial

Ramji Gupta v. Gopi Krishan Agrawal

11 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that Small Causes Courts lack jurisdiction to decide title, applications under Order IX Rule 13 CPC must be filed by parties only, and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be used to reopen settled matters or by non-parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Small Causes Court jurisdiction life estate Hindu Succession Act Section 14(2) Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Aarushi Dhasmana v. Union of India

10 Apr 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that while parental refusal cannot prevent medical care for minor conjoined twins, in absence of detailed medical reports, it directed periodic examinations and financial support under its wardship jurisdiction to protect their right to life under Article 21.

constitutional other Significant craniopagus twins right to life Article 21 wardship jurisdiction

S. Kesari Hanuman Goud v. Anjum Jehan

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court restored the trial court decree granting specific performance, holding the appellant ready and willing to perform the contract and rejecting the High Court's contrary finding.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness power of attorney Order XLI Rule 31 CPC

Venkataraja & Ors. v. Vidyane Doureradjaperumal & Ors.

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a suit for declaration of title without seeking possession relief is not maintainable when defendants are in possession, and a Hindu widow with only life estate cannot alienate absolute title under French Hindu Law.

property appeal_dismissed Significant life estate absolute title declaratory suit consequential relief

V.K. Surendra v. V.K. Thimmaiah & Ors.

10 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld that suit schedule properties are joint family properties and a Will partitioning them without co-parceners' consent is invalid, confirming shares accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint family property self-acquired property Hindu coparcenary partition

Swaroop Singh v. State of M.P.

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape based on the credible testimony of the prosecutrix alone, emphasizing that corroboration is not mandatory and medical evidence is not conclusive in such cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration Section 376 IPC

Kailash @ Tanti Banjara v. State of Madhya Pradesh

10 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 376 IPC, holding that sexual intercourse with a girl below 16 years is an offence irrespective of consent, based on reliable medical age determination.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 376 IPC rape age determination consent

Rushi Guman Singh v. State of Orissa & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of retrospective deemed suspension under Rule 12(4) of the Orissa Civil Services Rules when a removal order is set aside by a court and further inquiry is ordered.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deemed suspension Orissa Civil Services (CCA) Rules Rule 12(4) removal from service

Sunil Kundu v. State of Jharkhand

09 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants of murder charges due to irreconcilable inconsistencies between ocular and medical evidence and serious investigative lapses, granting them benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC firearm injury medical evidence ocular testimony

Manoj H. Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the removal of an atomic power plant employee for unauthorized press disclosure, rejecting his whistleblower claim and finding the punishment proportionate.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings whistleblower confidentiality proportionality of punishment

P. Thiagarajan v. Rajam Sreerangum & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal by recording an amicable settlement arrived at through mediation during the pendency of the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural civil appeal amicable settlement mediation Mediator's report

Sarva UP Gramin Bank & Ors. v. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.

09 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; H.L. Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of Circulars excluding RRB employees from promotion consideration based on prior penalties or adverse ratings, affirming that such exclusions are ultra vires the statutory promotion rules and that merit assessment including disciplinary records must be conducted by the selection committee.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Regional Rural Banks Promotion Seniority-cum-merit Disciplinary penalties

KRANTI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

09 Apr 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to fully comply with its earlier orders on Tsunami rehabilitation in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, mandating timely allotment of shelters, compensation, AAY cards, and infrastructure development.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tsunami rehabilitation shelter allotment Lok Adalat awards Antyodaya Anna Yojana

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Another v. Satya Prakash

09 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act does not invalidate a dismissal if misconduct is proved on merits in a complaint under Section 33A.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2)(b) Section 33A dismissal

Lillu @ Rajesh v. State of Haryana

09 Apr 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a minor's rapist, rejecting the two-finger test as a basis to infer consent and affirming the prosecutrix's testimony as sufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix age two-finger test consent