Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Supreme Court held that courts where a cheque is presented or where the payee resides have territorial jurisdiction to try offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the Bhiwani Court's jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction cheque dishonour K. Bhaskaran case

Doliben Kantilal Patel v. State of Gujarat

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a petition for FIR registration and CBI investigation into alleged custodial rape, emphasizing police discretion for preliminary inquiry and the need to exhaust statutory remedies before extraordinary relief.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 154 CrPC FIR registration custodial rape CBI investigation

Aparna A. Shah v. M/s Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd.

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that only the drawer who signs a cheque can be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and quashed proceedings against a non-signatory joint account holder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act drawer of cheque joint account holder liability vicarious criminal liability

N. Sengodan v. Secretary to Government, Home (Prohibition & Excise) Department, Chennai and Others

01 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that detention of a retired police officer under the Tamil Nadu Goondas Act for advocating formation of a police association was unlawful and awarded damages for illegal detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Preventive Detention Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act, 1922 Tamil Nadu Goondas Act Section 505 IPC

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. v. ANIS AHMAD

01 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that Consumer Fora lack jurisdiction to entertain complaints challenging assessment orders or actions relating to unauthorized use or theft of electricity under the Electricity Act, 2003, especially by industrial or commercial users who do not qualify as consumers under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Electricity Act, 2003 Section 126 assessment Unauthorized use of electricity

B. Lakshmana v. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited

01 Jul 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a disability certificate from a qualified medical practitioner suffices as proof of disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the High Court erred in setting aside compensation awards for non-production of X-rays.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 disability certificate medical evidence X-ray reports

Sarabjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a baseless FIR lodged without material evidence, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of legal process.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR agreement to sell abuse of process

Majendran Langeswaran v. State (NCT of Delhi)

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court quashed a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession due to incomplete proof and reasonable doubt arising from unexplained evidence and crime scene tampering.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession Section 302 IPC chain of evidence

State of M.P. v. Najab Khan & Ors.

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court restored the original sentence for grievous injury under Section 326 IPC, holding that the High Court erred in reducing the sentence without adequate reasons in a serious non-compoundable offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 326 IPC sentence reduction grievous injury non-compoundable offence

Sharanjit Kaur v. State of Punjab

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that police investigation and trial by regular criminal courts under Section 420 IPC are not barred by the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, dismissing anticipatory bail pleas based on Gram Panchayat jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Section 420 IPC Gram Panchayat jurisdiction Police investigation

Darshan Gupta v. Radhika Gupta

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of divorce petition on grounds of cruelty and incurable unsoundness of mind, emphasizing the matrimonial fault theory and the wife’s substantial recovery from cognitive deficiencies.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13(1)(iii) cruelty

Karthi @ Karthick v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape and cheating where sexual intercourse was procured by deceit through a false promise of marriage, rejecting the defense of consensual intercourse.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent deceit promise of marriage

Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Jarnail Singh for kidnapping and raping a minor, affirming that consent of a minor is immaterial and age must be conclusively determined by documentary evidence under Juvenile Justice Rules.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant minor consent immaterial rape conviction kidnapping juvenile justice rules

Vanchalabai Raghunath Ithape v. Shankarrao Baburao Bhilare

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that a sale deed with a condition of repurchase, absent a debtor-creditor relationship, is not a mortgage and dismissed the plaintiff's appeal for redemption after the stipulated period.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mortgage by conditional sale sale with condition of repurchase right to redeem debtor-creditor relationship

AHSANUL HODA v. STATE OF BIHAR

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court's higher compensation award for land acquisition and damages for standing crops, rejecting the High Court's reduction based on improper valuation and disregard of evidence.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition market value compensation standing crops

Makarand Dattatreya Sugavkar v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

01 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that the Municipal Commissioner’s power under Section 489 to carry out repairs is discretionary but subject to the occupier first seeking approval under Section 499, and dismissed the writ petition directing the Commissioner to repair a private flat at public cost.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Section 354 Section 489 Section 499

B. Raghuvir Acharya v. Central Bureau of Investigation

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court acquitted accused No.1 for lack of handwriting evidence but upheld and modified the conviction of accused No.3 for cheating by falsely claiming brokerage under the CANCIGO scheme.

criminal appeal_allowed (accused No.1), appeal_dismissed (accused No.3), conviction_modified (accused No.3) Significant criminal breach of trust cheating brokerage claim handwriting evidence

G. Ravindranath @ R. Chowdary v. E. Srinivas & Anr

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation to Rs. 20.2 lakhs for a grievously injured motor accident victim suffering permanent disability, emphasizing just and adequate damages including future medical expenses and loss of marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Compensation Personal injury Permanent disability

S. Manickam v. Metropolitan Transport Corp. Ltd

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that compensation for permanent disability and loss of earning capacity are distinct and both can be awarded separately in motor accident claims, restoring the appellant's compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle accident compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity

Taranjeet Singh Mohan Singh Sawhney and others v. District Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies and others

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court set aside a unilateral conveyance order for violation of natural justice due to non-service of notice of a preponed hearing date and remanded the matter for fresh disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant audi alteram partem natural justice unilateral conveyance Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963