Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

C.H. SURYANARAYANA v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

03 Jul 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court restored the original compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, setting aside the High Court's reduction of the amount.

civil appeal_allowed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation appellate interference Motor Vehicles Act

Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya v. State of M.P. & Ors.

03 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the State Legislature's amendment restricting the university's educational scope to Vedic learning, affirming the State's competence to regulate the university's statute and rejecting the appellant's challenge to its autonomy and fundamental rights claims.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant University statute amendment Vedic learning Education right Legislative competence

Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa

03 Jul 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that foreign arbitral awards are enforceable under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless enforcement violates the narrow concept of public policy of India, and mere errors of fact or contract breach do not justify refusal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement public policy of India Section 48 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab

03 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC based on credible evidence of dowry demand and harassment, applying the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, while reducing the sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

S. Anil Kumar v. State of Karnataka

03 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of the appellant in a dowry death case, holding that the High Court erred in convicting without sufficient evidence and misapplying statutory presumptions.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant dowry death dowry harassment Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC

Swastik Gases P. Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corp. Ltd.

03 Jul 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that a jurisdiction clause specifying courts at Kolkata excludes jurisdiction of other courts including Rajasthan High Court for arbitration matters, even without explicit exclusionary words.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant jurisdiction clause exclusive jurisdiction arbitration Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Chand

03 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's acquittal and upheld the murder conviction of Jai Chand based on medical evidence and circumstantial proof establishing homicidal death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant homicide post mortem report medical evidence disclosure statement

Rajinder Singh v. State of Haryana

03 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC, affirming that harassment for dowry soon before death and suspicious circumstances justify presumption of guilt under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

P. Sudhakar Rao v. U. Govinda Rao

03 Jul 2013 · R.M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that weightage of service for promotion eligibility is permissible but retrospective seniority granted to Supervisors over directly recruited Junior Engineers violates Articles 14 and 16 and is unconstitutional.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant weightage of service retrospective seniority promotion eligibility Articles 14 and 16

Nana Keshav Lagad v. State of Maharashtra; Balu and Another v. State of Maharashtra

03 Jul 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of accused for murder and assault under Sections 302 and 324 read with 34 IPC, affirming that reliable injured eyewitness testimony supported by medical and material evidence suffices to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC injured eyewitness common intention

Majjal v. State of Haryana

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Sharad Arvind Bobde
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court remanded a murder conviction appeal to the High Court for a fresh hearing, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judgments in criminal appeals affecting personal liberty.

criminal other Significant Section 302 IPC High Court appeal criminal appeal reasoned judgment

Commissioner of Police, New Delhi v. Mehar Singh; Commissioner of Police, New Delhi v. Shani Kumar

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of police recruitment candidature of acquitted candidates with criminal antecedents, affirming the Screening Committee's discretion to assess suitability beyond mere acquittal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Screening Committee Delhi Police recruitment criminal antecedents acquittal

K.C. Bajaj v. Union of India

02 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court reserved judgment on the validity of withdrawal of a government Office Memorandum due to procedural discrepancies and misleading affidavits, directing further hearing for clarification.

administrative other Significant Office Memorandum withdrawal Government of India Transaction of Business Rules Rule 12 approval affidavit accuracy

Rafique @ Rauf & others v. State of U.P.

02 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions based on a dying declaration recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., affirming its admissibility and sufficiency to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 161 CrPC statement Section 32 Evidence Act murder conviction

Jasvinder Saini & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

02 Jul 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that charges under Section 302 IPC cannot be mechanically added in dowry death cases without prima facie evidence and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304-B IPC Section 216 CrPC charge alteration

Vikram Singh @ Vicky v. Union of India

02 Jul 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court referred the constitutional validity of Section 364A IPC prescribing death penalty for kidnapping for ransom to a larger Bench, recognizing the need for authoritative determination without expressing final opinion.

criminal other Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom death penalty constitutional validity

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dayanand Chakrawarty

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that prescribing two different retirement ages for similarly situated Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam employees based solely on recruitment source is unconstitutional, affirming a uniform retirement age of 60 years and entitlement to consequential benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant age of superannuation Article 14 discrimination Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam

Association for Environment Protection v. State of Kerala and others

02 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sharad Arvind Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the public trust doctrine and constitutional environmental safeguards, quashing unauthorized construction on Periyar river banks without mandatory environmental clearance.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant public trust doctrine environmental impact assessment Article 48-A Article 21

Sheo Shankar Singh v. State of U.P.

02 Jul 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, rejecting the appellants' alibi and procedural objections, affirming the applicability of common intention and the sufficiency of eyewitness and medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention plea of alibi

Jiju Kuruvila v. Kunjujamma Mohan

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that foreign income for compensation must be converted at the exchange rate on the claim filing date, rejected contributory negligence against the deceased due to lack of evidence, and recalculated just compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 foreign currency conversion exchange rate date contributory negligence