Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Yogendra @ Yogesh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

21 May 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of appellants for murder and related offences, rejecting their plea of self-defence and affirming the reliability of medical and witness evidence despite acquittal of some co-accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 307 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dal Singh & Ors.

21 May 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a dying declaration made by a person with 100% burn injuries is admissible if the declarant was fit to make it, setting aside the High Court's acquittal and restoring the conviction for murder and cruelty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration 100 percent burns thumb impression Section 302 IPC

Samrendra Beura v. U.O.I. & others

20 May 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that under the Air Force Act, 1950, the sentence of imprisonment imposed by court-martial commences from the date the proceedings are signed, and pre-trial custody cannot be set off against the sentence, dismissing the petition for habeas corpus.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Air Force Act, 1950 court-martial sentence commencement pre-trial custody

Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana

20 May 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges, holding that mere failure to marry does not vitiate consent unless it is proved that the accused had no intention to marry from the outset.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape consent false promise of marriage Section 375 IPC

Moti Lal Songara v. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr.

16 May 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate can take cognizance independently of the police report and set aside the High Court's quashing of charges obtained by suppression of material facts, directing the trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 190(1)(b) CrPC cognizance suppression of facts quashing of charges

Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana

16 May 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under NDPS Act, ruling official witnesses' testimony reliable without independent witnesses, Section 50 inapplicable to vehicle searches, and 2001 amendments non-retrospective.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 18 NDPS Section 50 NDPS search and seizure

State of M.P. v. Sanjay Nagayach

16 May 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that supersession of a cooperative bank's Board without prior meaningful consultation with the RBI is illegal, quashed the supersession order, and directed reinstatement of the Board to complete its term.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Supersession Cooperative Societies Act Previous consultation Reserve Bank of India

Shyam Narain v. The State of NCT of Delhi

15 May 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for the brutal rape of an eight-year-old girl, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the need for just punishment and deterrence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape of minor Section 376(2)(f) IPC life imprisonment child victim testimony

Manohar Singh v. Narinder Singh

10 May 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed a contempt petition as infructuous after the tenant voluntarily handed over possession to the appellant, resolving the dispute.

civil petition_dismissed contempt petition possession tenant infructuous petition

Geomin Minerals & Marketing (P) Ltd. v. State of Orissa

10 May 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition challenging the State Government's recommendation for mineral concessions is premature before Central Government approval and remitted the matter for fresh consideration under the amended MM(D&R) Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 11 preferential rights prospecting licence mining lease

Board v. Shailesh Navekar

10 May 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals related to pollution control matters as devoid of merit while condoning delay in one appeal and leaving certain contentions open for appropriate proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed civil appeal merit dismissal delay condonation

State of Haryana v. Janak Singh

10 May 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that sentences for rape under Section 376 IPC cannot be reduced below the statutory minimum without adequate and special reasons, setting aside the High Court's order reducing sentences without such reasons and remanding for fresh disposal.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC minimum sentence sentence reduction

V.L.S. Finance Ltd. v. Union of India

10 May 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that the Company Law Board has jurisdiction to compound offences punishable with imprisonment or fine or both under Section 211(7) of the Companies Act, 1956, without prior permission of the criminal court.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 1956 Section 211(7) Section 621A compounding of offences

Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. v. Smt. Santosh & Ors.

10 May 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that 'Jugaad' is a motor vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, requiring registration, insurance, and licensed drivers, and directed strict enforcement by statutory authorities while allowing limited agricultural exemptions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Jugaad Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 2(28) motor vehicle definition

Nimmagadda Prasad v. Central Bureau of Investigation

09 May 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court dismissed bail to the accused in a serious economic offence case involving ongoing investigation, emphasizing the gravity of economic crimes and the need to prevent witness tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail economic offences Section 173(8) CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act

Anamika Roy v. Jatindra Chowrasia

09 May 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that where the landlord's bona fide requirement for the entire premises is established, courts need not order partial eviction under Section 13(4) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and affirmed eviction of the entire premises.

civil appeal_allowed Significant West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 Section 13(4) partial eviction landlord's bona fide requirement

Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. v. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

09 May 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that disputed limitation issues in arbitration appointment petitions under Section 11(6) are generally to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, not at the threshold, and appointed the arbitrators accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Limitation Dead claim

Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu

09 May 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape and double murder based on credible extra-judicial confession and corroborative evidence, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant extra-judicial confession rape murder circumstantial evidence

Central Bureau of Investigation v. V. Vijay Sai Reddy

09 May 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Yusuf Eqbal

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to a key accused in a multi-charge-sheet economic offence case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial presence for ongoing investigation and cancelling bail granted on irrelevant grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail criminal conspiracy economic offences investigation

Nirma Industries Ltd. & Anr. v. Securities & Exchange Board of India

09 May 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's rejection of withdrawal of a public offer under Regulation 27(1)(d), holding that withdrawal is permissible only in exceptional cases of impossibility and no personal hearing was mandated where written submissions were considered.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Act Takeover Code Regulation 27(1)(d) public offer withdrawal