Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Vathsala Manickavasagam & Ors. v. N. Ganesan & Anr.

02 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's decree holding disputed properties as joint family assets, emphasizing that a tacit admission under Section 17 Evidence Act outweighs unsupported claims of gift under Section 122 Transfer of Property Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit joint family property gift Section 17 Evidence Act

Anil Kumar Mahajan v. Union of India

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that compulsory retirement of a government employee on grounds of mental illness violates the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, and directed reinstatement with full benefits until superannuation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Section 47 mental illness compulsory retirement

Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited v. Udal

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's compensation award for land acquired for IMT Manesar, directing cumulative escalation calculation and remanding for fresh determination to ensure just and non-discriminatory compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value cumulative escalation

M.P. STATE MINING CORPORATION LTD. v. SANJEEV BHASKAR

02 Jul 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that legal heirs cannot continue or renew a mining lease after the lessee's death without a fresh application, setting aside the Delhi High Court's order favoring the heirs and upholding the lease granted to the State Mining Corporation.

property appeal_allowed Significant mining lease legal heirs renewal of lease death of lessee

Rajinder Singh v. Delhi College of Engineering

02 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court enhanced land acquisition compensation to Rs.50,000/- per bigha by applying market value based on contemporaneous sale deeds without depreciation, relying on precedent cases involving adjoining villages.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 compensation valuation market value land acquisition

Veer Pal Singh v. Secretary, Ministry of Defence

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Sharad Arvind Bobde

The Supreme Court held that medical board opinions are subject to judicial review and directed a review medical board to reassess the appellant's schizophrenia diagnosis and disability pension entitlement.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Board opinion Schizophrenic Reaction Disability pension Judicial review

Babu @ Balasubramaniam v. State of Tamil Nadu

02 Jul 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; A. K. Patnaik

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the husband for dowry harassment and culpable homicide but set aside the sister's conviction for lack of proper charge and unreliable evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 304 Part I IPC Section 109 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Geetaben Ratilal Patel v. District Primary Education Officer

02 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner under the Persons with Disabilities Act has jurisdiction to set aside dismissal orders passed during an employee's disability, directing reinstatement with salary and suitable posting.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Section 47(1) Section 62 Commissioner jurisdiction

P. Dharni v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu

01 Jul 2013 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; P. Sathasivam

The Supreme Court held that Special Rules governing promotion and appointment in the Tamil Nadu Transport Department override General Rules permitting out of turn promotion, invalidating the accelerated promotion granted without fulfilling prescribed eligibility criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Special Rules General Rules out of turn promotion accelerated promotion

Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that courts where a cheque is presented or where the payee resides have territorial jurisdiction to try offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the Bhiwani Court's jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction cheque dishonour K. Bhaskaran case

Doliben Kantilal Patel v. State of Gujarat

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a petition for FIR registration and CBI investigation into alleged custodial rape, emphasizing police discretion for preliminary inquiry and the need to exhaust statutory remedies before extraordinary relief.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 154 CrPC FIR registration custodial rape CBI investigation

Aparna A. Shah v. M/s Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd.

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that only the drawer who signs a cheque can be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and quashed proceedings against a non-signatory joint account holder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act drawer of cheque joint account holder liability vicarious criminal liability

N. Sengodan v. Secretary to Government, Home (Prohibition & Excise) Department, Chennai and Others

01 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that detention of a retired police officer under the Tamil Nadu Goondas Act for advocating formation of a police association was unlawful and awarded damages for illegal detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Preventive Detention Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act, 1922 Tamil Nadu Goondas Act Section 505 IPC

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. v. ANIS AHMAD

01 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that Consumer Fora lack jurisdiction to entertain complaints challenging assessment orders or actions relating to unauthorized use or theft of electricity under the Electricity Act, 2003, especially by industrial or commercial users who do not qualify as consumers under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Electricity Act, 2003 Section 126 assessment Unauthorized use of electricity

B. Lakshmana v. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited

01 Jul 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a disability certificate from a qualified medical practitioner suffices as proof of disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the High Court erred in setting aside compensation awards for non-production of X-rays.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 disability certificate medical evidence X-ray reports

Sarabjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a baseless FIR lodged without material evidence, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of legal process.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR agreement to sell abuse of process

Majendran Langeswaran v. State (NCT of Delhi)

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court quashed a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession due to incomplete proof and reasonable doubt arising from unexplained evidence and crime scene tampering.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession Section 302 IPC chain of evidence

State of M.P. v. Najab Khan & Ors.

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court restored the original sentence for grievous injury under Section 326 IPC, holding that the High Court erred in reducing the sentence without adequate reasons in a serious non-compoundable offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 326 IPC sentence reduction grievous injury non-compoundable offence

Sharanjit Kaur v. State of Punjab

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that police investigation and trial by regular criminal courts under Section 420 IPC are not barred by the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, dismissing anticipatory bail pleas based on Gram Panchayat jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Section 420 IPC Gram Panchayat jurisdiction Police investigation

Darshan Gupta v. Radhika Gupta

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of divorce petition on grounds of cruelty and incurable unsoundness of mind, emphasizing the matrimonial fault theory and the wife’s substantial recovery from cognitive deficiencies.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13(1)(iii) cruelty