Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

National Textile Corpn. (UP) Ltd v. Dr. Raja Ram Jaipuria

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that Bungalow No. 2 of Swadeshi House did not vest in the National Textile Corporation under the Swadeshi Act, dismissing the appellant's claims for possession and eviction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 vesting of property Bungalow No. 2 National Textile Corporation

State of U.P. v. Gobardhan & Ors.

01 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to material contradictions and lack of credible evidence, emphasizing restraint in interfering with acquittals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Acquittal Common intention

Essar Teleholdings Ltd. v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court & Ors.

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the jurisdiction of the Special Judge appointed under the Prevention of Corruption Act to try IPC offences connected to the 2G Scam, dismissing challenges to the Special Court's constitution and trial proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Special Judge Prevention of Corruption Act 2G Scam Section 420 IPC

State of Rajasthan v. Shiv Charan

01 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's conviction under Sections 302/149/148 IPC, holding that the respondents were liable as members of an unlawful assembly with a common object to cause fatal injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly constructive liability common object

Pramod Kumar v. State (GNCT) of Delhi

01 Jul 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra · 2013 AIR SCW 3102
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Pramod Kumar for murder, holding that reliable police testimony and forensic evidence sufficiently proved he fired the fatal shot, rejecting the defense plea of police firing.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant police witness credibility proclaimed offender gunshot injury desi katta

Rajendra Nagar Adarsh Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that only the Central Government can acquire land for railway purposes under the Land Acquisition Act, invalidating acquisition proceedings initiated by the State Government without Central Government authority.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 appropriate Government Union List State Government

S. IYYAPAN v. M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

01 Jul 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot deny liability for compensation merely because the driver lacked a commercial vehicle endorsement when holding a valid license for a light motor vehicle, emphasizing the statutory protection of accident victims under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 149 third party insurance driving licence

K. Guruprasad Rao v. State of Karnataka and others

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that mining activities causing damage to a protected ancient monument violate heritage protection laws and ordered cessation of mining within one kilometer of the Jambunatheshwara Temple.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant ancient monuments mining operations protected area Karnataka Ancient Monuments Act

Harivadan Babubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat

01 Jul 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, rejected delay and non-examination of witness arguments, but set aside the conspiracy conviction due to acquittal of co-accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence delay in FIR confession discovery of dead body

Kamal Jora v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.

01 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld that the Municipal Council was given a valid opportunity of hearing before dissolution under Section 8-AA of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, dismissing the appeal against the dissolution notifications.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Municipal Council dissolution Section 8-AA Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act Article 243U Constitution of India opportunity of hearing

Mohit alias Sonu and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

01 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the trial court's order refusing to summon accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. without notice, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory revision remedies and uphold principles of natural justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 397 Cr.P.C. summoning of accused

Neerupam Mohan Mathur v. New India Assurance Co.

01 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a claimant who lost his right hand in a motor accident, emphasizing proper assessment of loss of earning capacity and comprehensive damages including prosthesis and pain and suffering.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent disability loss of earning capacity motor accident compensation prosthesis cost

Kalpana Dilip Bahirat v. Pune Municipal Corp.

27 Jun 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that an election to a reserved municipal seat obtained by submitting a false caste certificate is retrospectively void under the Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000, overriding the usual election petition process.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant caste certificate validity certificate reserved seat municipal election

Sanchar Devi v. Ara Municipal Corporation

25 Jun 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that permanent municipal employees are entitled to pension under the Bihar Municipal Officers and Servants Pension Rules, 1987 even if they did not exercise the option for pension, where the employer's failure prevented such exercise.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Bihar Municipal Officers and Servants Pension Rules, 1987 pension entitlement option to pension municipal employees

Ashvinbhai Jayantilal Modi v. Ramkaran Ramchandra Sharma & Anr.

18 Jun 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by realistically assessing future income of a deceased medical student, applying Sarla Verma multiplier based on parents' age, and setting aside contributory negligence attributed to the deceased.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future income loss of dependency

Arun Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P.

29 May 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for criminal contempt against a lawyer who threatened and abused a judicial officer in court, rejecting his unconditional apology as insufficient to absolve contempt liability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant contempt of court court decorum unconditional apology judicial officer

Engineering Export Promotion Council v. Usha Anand

29 May 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra · AIR 2008 SC 1614

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in directing refund of money voluntarily deposited with a government agency under Section 482 CrPC, and such matters must be challenged by writ petition.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC inherent powers refund of deposit doctrine of parity

Sambhavana v. University of Delhi

29 May 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court emphasized the University of Delhi's statutory and constitutional obligation to make focused and sensitive educational accommodations for visually impaired students in its new undergraduate programme, while dismissing the appeal without stay but directing further consideration of grievances.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 visually impaired students inclusive education curriculum modification

Rohtash Kumar v. State of Haryana

29 May 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, applying the doctrine of last seen together and rejecting the appellant's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together Section 302 IPC Section 404 IPC

G. Jayalal v. Union of India and others

29 May 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Selection Committee's recommendations after due deliberation, rejected claims of legal malice and improper preference ordering, and dismissed the appellant's challenge.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Selection Committee order of preference legal malice Prasar Bharati Act