Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. State

20 Nov 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings for bank fraud cannot be quashed merely because civil remedies exist, emphasizing sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and ordered expeditious trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings bank fraud civil remedy vs criminal remedy

Leela Shashikant Purandare v. Arvind Vishnu Govande

19 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's claim to partnership and possession rights over leased industrial property based on an unregistered partnership deed, affirming that unauthorized occupation without registered partnership or lessor's permission does not confer rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Partnership Act Section 69 unregistered partnership possession

Daljit Kaur and another v. Muktar Steels Pvt. Ltd. and others

19 Nov 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld a consent decree passed after due enquiry, holding that such decrees are not appealable under Section 96(3) CPC, and dismissed the appeal challenging the decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent decree compromise decree Section 96(3) CPC Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC

Beenu Rawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Nov 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Shiva Kirti Singh; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court directed an independent inquiry by the National Human Rights Commission into alleged police excesses against peaceful AAP protestors, affirming the protection of fundamental rights under Article 21.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 21 fundamental rights police atrocities peaceful protest

State of U.P. v. Naushad

19 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that sexual intercourse obtained by a false promise of marriage with no intention to marry vitiates consent and amounts to rape under Section 376 IPC, restoring the conviction and life sentence of the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape consent misconception of fact false promise of marriage

Ganesha v. Sharanappa & Anr.

19 Nov 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot convert an acquittal into conviction under its revisional jurisdiction and must order a retrial if interference is warranted, setting aside the conviction imposed in revision.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 401 CrPC revisional jurisdiction conversion of acquittal into conviction perverse appreciation of evidence informant vs complainant

Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika v. Willingdon Sports Club

18 Nov 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a club providing catering services to its members must obtain a licence under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as such services constitute an 'eating house' or 'catering establishment' requiring regulation for public health and safety.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant eating house licence catering establishment Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Section 394(1)(e)

Pehlad Ram v. Haryana Urban Development Authority

18 Nov 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that when land acquisition follows shortly after purchase, the purchase price is the best evidence of market value and reduced the compensation accordingly, disallowing protection for purchasers who suppress consideration to evade stamp duty.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation market value purchase price

BALWANT RAI SALUJA & ANR. v. AIR INDIA LTD. & ORS.

13 Nov 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that workmen employed in a statutory canteen run by a wholly owned subsidiary are employees of the subsidiary and not the holding company, dismissing claims that the holding company was their principal employer.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant principal employer statutory canteen Factories Act Section 46 corporate veil

Tribhuvanshankar v. Amrutlal

13 Nov 2013 · Dipak Misra; Anil R. Dave

In an eviction suit under the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, proof of landlord-tenant relationship is essential and eviction cannot be granted solely on title; however, the plaintiff may file a fresh suit for title and possession, with limitation and adverse possession periods arrested by the original suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction landlord-tenant relationship adverse possession M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961

Calcutta Port Trust v. Anadi Kumar Das

13 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a retired employee cannot claim belated pension benefits without proving lack of effective communication of pension scheme circulars, but allowed the respondent a one-time opportunity to opt for the pension scheme on peculiar facts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Pension Scheme Contributory Provident Fund Delay and Laches Communication of Circulars

State of U.P. v. Ajay Kumar Sharma

13 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that renewal of District Government Counsel appointments is not a matter of right and must be made following statutory procedure, objective assessment, and consultation with District Judges and Magistrates, setting aside the High Court’s interim mandamus for automatic renewal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant District Government Counsel Appointment Renewal Legal Remembrancer’s Manual

Surinder Singh v. State of Haryana

13 Nov 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the husband for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, holding that a demand made soon after marriage to supplement insufficient dowry, including for business, attracts the presumption of dowry death.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 113B Indian Evidence Act

Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P.

12 Nov 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranj...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that police officers are mandatorily required to register an FIR upon receiving information disclosing a cognizable offence under Section 154 CrPC without conducting any preliminary inquiry.

criminal appeal_allowed Landmark First Information Report Section 154 CrPC mandatory FIR registration preliminary inquiry

PARIWAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD v. CHANDRASHEKAR M. VIRKUD

12 Nov 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held the promoter primarily liable for refunding amounts paid by a society member, making the cooperative society secondarily liable, and modified consumer commission orders accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Cooperative Housing Society Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Refund of amount Mismanagement of funds

Sukhwinder Singh v. State of Punjab

12 Nov 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304B IPC for dowry death, emphasizing the statutory presumption and rejecting minor procedural lapses as grounds for acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304B IPC dowry death Section 113B Indian Evidence Act presumption of dowry death

State of Haryana v. Rajinder

12 Nov 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to credible alibi evidence and lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder alibi benefit of doubt

Philomena Dhanin v. State of Rajasthan

11 Nov 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that a Sarpanch removable by Panchayat resolution is not entitled to protection under Section 197 Cr.P.C., and criminal proceedings against such a Sarpanch for illegal acts cannot be quashed for lack of prior sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 Cr.P.C. Sarpanch Public servant Prior sanction

Bhola Ram v. State of Punjab

11 Nov 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court acquitted Bhola Ram in a dowry death case due to lack of specific evidence of his active involvement in dowry demands or cruelty, clarifying the limits of presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

Gulab Chand Bhora & Ors. v. Punjab National Bank & Anr.

11 Nov 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld a Trial Court decree granting enhanced rent based on mutual agreement and committee recommendations, rejecting the High Court's direction to seek rent fixation from the Rent Controller.

civil appeal_allowed Significant enhanced rent tenancy agreement mutual settlement regional building committee