Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

M/s. Shree Mahavir Carbon Ltd v. Om Prakash Jalan

28 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's non-speaking order quashing cognizance of a criminal complaint and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper judicial reasoning.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Cognizance of offence Judicial reasoning Non-speaking order

Gurjant Singh @ Janta v. State of Punjab

28 Oct 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under the NDPS Act due to non-compliance with mandatory Section 50 safeguards and held that an officer not substantively Gazetted cannot validate a search.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Gazetted officer Search and seizure Own Rank Pay DSP

Sudam Charan Dash v. State of Orissa & Anr.

25 Oct 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot direct release on bail upon surrender after rejecting anticipatory bail, as it unlawfully fetters the trial court's discretion under Sections 438 and 439 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Section 439 CrPC bail discretion

T.C. Gupta v. Bimal Kumar Dutta & Ors.

25 Oct 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that grant of licence not explicitly prohibited by an interim order does not constitute contempt and accepted the appellant's unconditional apology, setting aside the contempt finding.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court interim order status quo grant of licence

P. Dasaratharama Reddy Complex v. Government of Karnataka

25 Oct 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that contract clauses empowering departmental officers to decide disputes without judicial adjudication do not constitute arbitration agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement dispute resolution clause Chief Engineer expert determination

Dr. Balram Prasad v. Dr. Kunal Saha

24 Oct 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld medical negligence liability but modified compensation and liability apportionment, affirming the multiplier method and procedural requirements for claims and evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence compensation multiplier method loss of consortium

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. S.K. Bhatnagar

24 Oct 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court remanded a pension commutation dispute for detailed reconsideration, emphasizing careful adjudication of delay, limitation, and evidence without adverse presumptions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pension commutation limitation laches adverse inference

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.

24 Oct 2013 · A.K. Sikri; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that only representations against adverse police service records made within prescribed time limits and procedures are maintainable, upheld the review and recall of illegal expunction orders, and clarified the scope of administrative and judicial review in such cases.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report Adverse remarks Representation procedure Director General of Police

Joginder Singh v. State of Haryana

24 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of Joginder Singh, holding that contradictions in ballistic evidence and non-examination of material witnesses created reasonable doubt about his guilt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal ballistic report contradiction possession dispute firearm injuries

L. Krishna Reddy v. State by Station House Officer & Ors.

24 Oct 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discharge of the deceased husband's parents from murder and dowry harassment charges due to lack of sufficient prima facie evidence connecting them to the crime.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 227 CrPC discharge of accused dowry harassment murder

Sita Ram v. Balbir @ Bali & Anr.

24 Oct 2013 · T. S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court cancelled bail granted to an influential accused in a murder case due to strong prima facie evidence and risk of witness tampering despite forensic doubts about the fatal weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail prima facie case murder attempt to murder

Shobha Sinha v. The State of Bihar

23 Oct 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of a government servant due to procedural irregularities and failure to consider a statutory review committee's exoneration, directing fresh punishment consistent with principles of natural justice and proportionality.

labor appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice burden of proof disproportionate punishment

Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India

22 Oct 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the existing Food Safety and Standards Act framework adequately regulates soft drinks' safety, labelling, and advertising, and directed strict enforcement without constituting a separate expert committee.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 soft drinks regulation food additives labelling requirements

Mary v. State of Kerala

22 Oct 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that forfeiture of security deposit under a statutory contract is valid despite impossibility of performance, rejecting the appellant's plea of frustration and fairness.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant statutory contract doctrine of frustration Section 56 Indian Contract Act forfeiture of security deposit

State of Rajasthan v. Ucchab Lal Chhanwal

22 Oct 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that promotion orders affecting seniority cannot be passed without impleading all affected parties and that retrospective application of a later circular on punishments is impermissible.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority-cum-merit censure punishment natural justice

State of Maharashtra & Anr. v. Sarva Shramik Sangh, Sangli & Ors.

21 Oct 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that termination due to transfer of undertaking entitles workmen only to compensation under Section 25FF read with 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, but moulded relief including continuity of service and backwages may be granted under Article 142 to ensure equity and parity with similarly situated workmen.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F Section 25N Section 25FF

Badshah v. Sou.Urmila Badshah Godse

18 Oct 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a woman married to a man with a subsisting first marriage, who was kept unaware of the first marriage and lived with him as his wife, is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance wife second marriage

Punjab National Bank v. Ram Kishan

18 Oct 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that an employee who has not completed 15 years of qualifying service is not entitled to pension under the Bank's Pension Regulations despite voluntary retirement under the Bank's VRS.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Regulations Qualifying service Punjab National Bank

M/s. Arcot Textile Mills Ltd. v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

18 Oct 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that no appeal lies against independent interest demands under Section 7Q of the Employees’ Provident Funds Act but mandated provision of computation details and limited opportunity to object, setting aside the High Court orders dismissing the writ petition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7Q interest demand Section 7I appeal natural justice

State of U.P & Ors. v. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd

18 Oct 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that a State's rebate of tax that discriminates against goods imported from other States violates Articles 301 and 304(a) of the Constitution, but severed the offending condition to uphold the remainder of the notification.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant rebate of tax Article 301 Article 304(a) discrimination