Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

NATIONAL AGR.CO-OP. M.F.O.I.LTD. (NAFED) v. M/S. EARTHTECH ENTERPRISES LTD

11 Nov 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court restored the Single Judge's order upholding an interim arbitral award directing payment based on earlier binding judicial findings of liability, setting aside the Division Bench's contrary order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim arbitral award liability Division Bench Single Judge

Bhupendra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

11 Nov 2013 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for dowry death despite absence of viscera report and clarified that Sections 304-B and 306 IPC are not mutually exclusive and can be applied concurrently.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide

Ganpath Singh Gangaram Singh Rajput v. Gulbarga University

01 Nov 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a Master's degree in Mathematics is not a relevant qualification for appointment as Lecturer in MCA, quashing the appointment and affirming judicial review over expert academic decisions on eligibility.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant academic appointment relevant subject eligibility criteria judicial review

U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. v. GURCHARAN SINGH & ANR.

01 Nov 2013 · ANIL R. DAVE; DIPAK MISRA

The Supreme Court upheld the employer's pay re-fixation of a re-employed ex-serviceman clerk, ruling that pension benefits preclude counting past service for pay fixation and allowing recovery of excess salary paid due to initial error.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay fixation re-employed pensioners ex-servicemen Central Civil Services (Fixation of pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986

Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha v. Dhobei Sahoo

01 Nov 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the temporary entrustment of CEO functions to the Chairman of CESU was lawful under the Electricity Act and Scheme, quashing the High Court's order invalidating the appointment and directing recovery of honorarium.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ of quo warranto public interest litigation temporary appointment Electricity Act 2003

GIRISH BHUSHAN GOYAL v. B.H.E.L. & ANR.

01 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that dismissal for negligence shortly before retirement is disproportionate and restored the appellant's pensionary benefits, modifying punishment to a minor penalty.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination negligence pensionary benefits disciplinary action

Asha & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand

01 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to lack of cogent evidence proving cruelty or dowry demand as required under Section 304B IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC cruelty harassment

Radhakrishna and another v. Gokul and others

31 Oct 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation to Rs.7,00,000 for the parents of a deceased engineering student killed in a motor accident, applying the multiplier method and principles of future prospects under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation multiplier method future prospects personal expenses deduction

Rajeev Kumar v. State of Haryana

31 Oct 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court overturned the conviction under Section 304B IPC for dowry death due to lack of proof of cruelty related to dowry demand but convicted the appellant under Sections 498A and 306 IPC for cruelty and abetment of suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC dying declaration abetment of suicide

State of Rajasthan v. Balveer @ Balli

31 Oct 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court reinstated convictions for rape and murder based on corroborated approver testimony but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, clarifying the law on approvers and corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant approver Section 306 CrPC accomplice testimony corroboration

T.S.R. Subramanian v. Union of India

31 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court directed the constitution of Civil Service Boards of senior officers, mandated fixed tenure and recording of instructions for civil servants, while declining to create an independent statutory Civil Service Board without legislative sanction.

administrative other Significant Civil Service Board Fixed tenure Recording of instructions Administrative reforms

Jagdish Singh v. Heeralal and others

30 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that civil courts have no jurisdiction to entertain suits challenging enforcement measures under the SARFAESI Act, and such disputes must be adjudicated exclusively by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 34 SARFAESI Act Debt Recovery Tribunal jurisdiction Civil court jurisdiction barred

MAK Data P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-II

30 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that surrender of income after detection without satisfactory explanation attracts penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) penalty voluntary disclosure concealment of income Explanation 1 to Section 271(1)(c)

Ch. cum Man. Director Mahanadi Coalfield Ltd. v. Rabindranath Choubey

29 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court admitted the appeal to consider whether gratuity can be withheld after retirement due to pending disciplinary proceedings, directing a larger Bench to resolve the conflict between statutory gratuity rights and non-statutory service rules.

labor other Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Conduct, Discipline & Appeal Rules, 1978 gratuity withholding departmental inquiry

State of Bihar & Anr. v. Lalu Singh

29 Oct 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that an Inspector of the Criminal Investigation Department, being superior in rank and entrusted with investigation, is competent to submit the charge-sheet under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(2) CrPC officer-in-charge Criminal Investigation Department charge-sheet

AVK Traders v. Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited

29 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that on dissolution of a two-partner firm due to death of one partner and refusal of legal heirs to continue, the surviving partner can continue the suit as a sole proprietor by amending the plaint under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partnership dissolution continuation of suit Order XXII Rule 10 CPC Order XXX Rule 4 CPC

Manish Trivedi v. State of Rajasthan

29 Oct 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Municipal Councillor is a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by virtue of statutory deeming provisions, allowing prosecution for corruption offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant public servant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Municipal Councillor legal fiction

United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sunil Kumar & Anr.

29 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that compensation claims under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act are governed by the no-fault liability principle and referred conflicting issues for a larger Bench.

civil other Significant Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act no-fault liability compensation motor accident claims

State of Orissa v. Kanhu Charan Majhi

28 Oct 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the Governor's power to review departmental orders must be exercised within a reasonable time, invalidated a five-year delayed review, and dismissed the State's appeal against the employee.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Governor's power of review Orissa Civil Services Rules Rule 31 Rule 32

Sukumar De v. Bimalaauddy & Ors.

28 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretionary order granting judgment debtors an opportunity to deposit the decretal amount to set aside an auction sale, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order 21 Rule 89 CPC execution proceedings auction sale discretionary relief