Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Saraswathy v. Babu

25 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that continuing acts of domestic violence post-enactment of the PWD Act, including refusal to allow residence, justify protection, maintenance, and compensation orders, allowing the wife's appeal and directing compliance by the husband.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 domestic violence residence orders maintenance

Devendra Kishanlal Dagalia v. Dwarkesh Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

25 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate cannot recall summons issued under Section 204 Cr.P.C. by invoking Section 201 Cr.P.C., and that jurisdiction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act lies where any constituent act of the offence occurred, allowing the complaint to be tried at Mumbai.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 201 Cr.P.C. Magistrate jurisdiction Summons recall

C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal

22 Nov 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act must be granted after conscious application of mind to all relevant material, and while validity of sanction is generally examined at trial, serious failure of justice may warrant earlier scrutiny.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19 failure of justice

C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.

22 Nov 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside the Special Judge's grant of pardon to an accused under Section 306 Cr.P.C., emphasizing judicial discretion and consideration of culpability before making an accused an approver.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 306 Cr.P.C. pardon approver judicial discretion

Union of India & Anr. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal

22 Nov 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a 14-year suspension of a government servant, emphasizing that suspension orders must be based on due application of mind and cannot be continued in defiance of final judicial orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension of government servant judicial review Central Administrative Tribunal quashing of suspension order

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. Neeraj Kumar & Anr.

22 Nov 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court remanded a contempt petition alleging suppression of material facts by investigating officers, emphasizing the need for proper procedure, limitation compliance, and reasoned findings in contempt proceedings.

criminal other Significant contempt of court Article 215 Constitution of India Contempt of Courts Act 1971 limitation

Pathan Mohammed Suleman Rehmatkhan v. State of Gujarat & Ors.

22 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's bona fide policy decision to allot land for the GIFT City project, holding that CAG reports are advisory and do not invalidate policy decisions absent mala fide or statutory violations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Public-Private Partnership CAG report Land allotment Article 14

State of Jharkhand and Another v. Harihar Yadav and Others

22 Nov 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that both Bihar and Jharkhand States bear constitutional liability to pay arrears of salary and absorb employees of BHALCO/JHALCO, emphasizing the State's duty as a model employer under Article 21 to protect employees' right to livelihood.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 21 State liability Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 government companies

Satnam Overseas v. Sant Ram & Co.

22 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's bona fide use of the trademark "KOHINOOR" across Uttar Pradesh, dismissing the appellant's challenge to restrict its use despite the appellant's later registration.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant trademark rectification bona fide use geographical restrictions concurrent use

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Nov 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that further examination of witnesses after filing an affidavit stating investigation completion, pursuant to superior officers' directions, does not constitute deliberate perjury warranting prosecution under Section 340 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant perjury Section 340 Cr.P.C. Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. investigation completion

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. CBI

22 Nov 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court disposed of a criminal appeal by referring to its earlier judgment in a related appeal involving the same parties, emphasizing judicial economy.

criminal other Procedural criminal appeal judicial economy disposal of appeals Supreme Court of India

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. CBI and Ors.

22 Nov 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 1840 of 2013 by referring to the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 1837 of 2013 involving the same parties, without separate hearing.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural Criminal Appeal Supreme Court judicial economy disposal of appeals

State Bank of India v. Gracure Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

22 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a plaintiff must include all claims arising from the same cause of action in one suit and dismissed the second suit filed by the respondent as barred under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 2 Rule 2 CPC cause of action splitting of claim multiplicity of suits

Gurcharan Singh v. Surjit Singh

22 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition upholding the ex-parte decree passed due to defendants' non-appearance, finding no substantial question of law for interference.

civil appeal_dismissed ex-parte decree agreement to sell non-appearance setting aside decree

Duddilla Srinivasa Sharma and Ors. v. V. Chrysolite

21 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of recruitment where candidates were excluded by raising qualification criteria beyond prescribed rules, emphasizing that shortlisting must be rational and conform to eligibility norms.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant shortlisting recruitment eligibility criteria intermediate qualification

E.S.I.C. Medical Officer’s Association v. E.S.I.C.

21 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that medical doctors employed by ESIC are professionals and not "workmen" under the Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing their claim for deputation allowance.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant workman definition Industrial Disputes Act 1947 medical officers professional vs occupation

Subhasish Mondal @ Bijoy v. State of West Bengal

21 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for double murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and established motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence motive Section 302 IPC Section 313 CrPC

Haryana Wakf Board v. Mahesh Kumar

21 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri · 2013 (11) SCALE 210

The Supreme Court held that disputes regarding whether property is Wakf property fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Wakf Tribunal, barring Civil Courts from entertaining such suits filed after the Wakf Act's commencement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Wakf property Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction Section 7 Haryana Wakf Act Section 85 Haryana Wakf Act

Manti Devi v. State of Bihar

21 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of compulsory retirement and denied compassionate appointment to the deceased employee's son since the employee died after retirement.

civil appeal_dismissed compulsory retirement Rule 74 Bihar Service Code compassionate appointment public interest

B. Chandrika v. Santhosh

21 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate may take cognizance of a protest complaint after a police refer report, but must exercise discretion and not prosecute an accused without factual involvement, quashing summons against the divorced second accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant protest complaint police refer report cognizance Section 420 IPC