Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Himmat Singh and others v. State of M.P. and another

29 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Shiva Kirti Singh; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in land acquisition for railway purposes, all bona fide sale deeds must be considered without impermissible deductions for development charges, awarding enhanced compensation with statutory benefits to the appellants.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value compensation development charges

Himmat Singh and others v. State of M.P. and another

29 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Shiva Kirti Singh; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition with 10% annual escalation and remanded claims for additional damages for fresh adjudication.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value escalation in land prices

State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat and Another

28 Nov 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that offences under Section 307 IPC are non-compoundable and cannot be quashed merely on compromise, emphasizing the societal interest in prosecuting serious crimes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC non-compoundable offence Section 320 CrPC Section 482 CrPC

State of West Bengal v. Sankar Ghosh

28 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically entitle a dismissed police officer to reinstatement, especially when departmental proceedings have established misconduct and service rules do not mandate reinstatement.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry criminal acquittal reinstatement honourable acquittal

S.K. Rattan v. Union of India

28 Nov 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that a government employee transferred without framing new service rules continues under original service conditions and is entitled to pay parity and protection against arbitrary reduction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer of government employees service rules Article 309 Constitution pay parity

Madhu @ Madhuranatha & Anr. v. State of Karnataka

28 Nov 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence but commuted the death sentence to 30 years' rigorous imprisonment, emphasizing that the case did not meet the threshold for the rarest of rare category.

criminal sentence_modified Significant circumstantial evidence death sentence extra-judicial confession recovery witnesses

M/s. Gayatri Project Ltd. v. M/s. Sai Krishna Construction

28 Nov 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that a disputed claim of full and final settlement does not preclude reference to arbitration, and the validity of such settlement must be decided by the arbitrator.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration full and final settlement arbitrability Section 11 Arbitration Act

Poonam Tandon v. The Chancellor, Lucknow University

28 Nov 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the Chancellor's final authority to decide on university appointments under Section 31(8)(a) of the U.P. State Universities Act, rejecting the High Court's interference due to alleged procedural defects in the Executive Council's dissent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 Section 31(8)(a) Chancellor's decision Executive Council dissent

Collector of Land Acquisition v. M/S Andaman Timber Industries

28 Nov 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a perpetual license under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Regulation confers an interest in land entitling the licensee to compensation upon acquisition, and dismissed the review petition challenging this principle.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition licensee interest Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 Land Acquisition Act, 1894

K.C. Bajaj v. Union of India

27 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Non Practising Allowance must be included in basic pay for pension calculation of doctors retired before 1996, rejecting arbitrary exclusion and affirming equality under Article 14.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Non Practising Allowance Pension calculation Pre-1996 retirees Article 14

B. Thirumal v. Ananda Sivakumar

27 Nov 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that redesignation of Junior Engineers as Assistant Engineers upon acquiring a degree is an upgradation, not recruitment by transfer or promotion, and such officers remain members of the Subordinate Service eligible only under the reserved quota for that service.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant redesignation upgradation promotion recruitment by transfer

Lakha Ram Sharma v. Balar Marketing Private Limited & Ors.

27 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that delay caused by filing a rectification petition in a court lacking jurisdiction can be excluded under the Limitation Act, allowing the petition to be adjudicated on merits by the IPAB.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark Rectification Petition Intellectual Property Appellate Board Territorial Jurisdiction

U.O.I. & Ors. v. S.C. Karmakar & Ors.

27 Nov 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the grant of pay scale parity to CBI Office Superintendents with Central Secretariat Section Officers, dismissing the government's appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Office Superintendent Central Bureau of Investigation pay scale parity Section Officer

NOIDA Entrepreneurs Association v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority

27 Nov 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda · 2011 6 SCC 508

The Supreme Court held that irregular and arbitrary land allotments by NOIDA are illegal, directing show cause notices to beneficiaries and emphasizing strict compliance with statutory provisions.

administrative other Significant NOIDA land allotment U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 public interest litigation

CHIRONJILAL SHARMA HUF v. UNION OF INDIA

26 Nov 2013 · R.M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that interest under Section 132B(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act is payable on retained assets exceeding tax liability from six months after the Section 132(5) order until the date of regular assessment, distinct from post-assessment refund provisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 132 Income Tax Act Section 132B(4)(b) interest search and seizure pre-assessment interest

Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma

26 Nov 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a live-in relationship between an unmarried woman and a married man does not constitute a "relationship in the nature of marriage" under the DV Act, and thus the woman cannot claim maintenance or protection as a victim of domestic violence under the Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant live-in relationship relationship in the nature of marriage Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 domestic violence

Sarah Mathew v. Institute of Cardio Vascular Diseases

26 Nov 2013 · P. Sathasivam; B.S. Chauhan; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan G...

The Supreme Court held that for limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C., the relevant date is when the Magistrate takes cognizance of the offence, not the date of filing the complaint, and delay can be condoned under Section 473 in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 468 Cr.P.C. Limitation period Taking cognizance Section 473 Cr.P.C.

State of Gujarat v. Girish Radhakrishnan Varde

25 Nov 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Gyan Sudha Misra
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

In a police report case, a magistrate cannot add charges after chargesheet submission; such additions must be made at the framing of charges stage before the trial court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant chargesheet magistrate powers police report complaint case

Kanthamma v. K. Shettappa

25 Nov 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed a DNA test to establish paternity, setting aside the High Court's refusal to permit such a test.

civil appeal_allowed Significant DNA test paternity illegitimate child partition

Manoharan v. Sivaranjan

25 Nov 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the suit for non-payment of court fee and condoning delay in filing the appeal, emphasizing the constitutional mandate of equal justice and legal aid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fee condonation of delay Section 149 CPC Article 39A Constitution