Supreme Court of India

17,225 judgments

Year:

Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri v. State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department

04 Aug 1959 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that revenue authorities cannot declare a registered partition deed executed before the cut-off date as sham and ignore it for land ceiling purposes, restoring the rights of daughters under such partition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 partition deed cut-off date sham partition

Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri v. State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department

04 Aug 1959 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that a registered partition deed executed before the cut-off date under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 cannot be declared sham or ignored by revenue authorities, restoring the rights of daughters under such partition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 partition deed cut-off date sham partition

Ram Kishor Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement

17 Sep 1956 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2023 INSC 1082

The Supreme Court held that informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest orally with contemporaneous acknowledgment satisfies Section 19 of PMLA and upheld the arrest, rejecting retrospective application of the Pankaj Bansal judgment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 19 PMLA grounds of arrest informing arrestee binding precedent

CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. DR. KAMALA SELVARAJ

23 Apr 1949 · ARAVIND KUMAR; N.V. ANJARIA · 2025 INSC 1200
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld that a property lawfully subdivided before development regulations came into force is exempt from Open Space Reservation charges under the applicable regulations.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Open Space Reservation charges lawful subdivision Development Regulations Annexure XX exemption

M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd v. State of Jharkhand

10 Oct 1947 · R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that audit objections pointing out overlooked factual errors constitute valid 'information' under Section 19 of the Bihar Finance Act, justifying re-opening of assessment, and upheld the re-assessment order against M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 19 Bihar Finance Act audit objection re-assessment information