Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Director, Printing and Stationary Department, U.P. Government Press v. Moti Lal and others

07 Mar 2014 · H. L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court directed regularization of daily-wage Group-D employees in Uttar Pradesh Government Press as per 1985 Rules, excluding the "Gatemen" post, modifying the High Court judgment and ensuring compliance with earlier government orders and Supreme Court directions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant regularization daily-wage employees Group-D posts Uttar Pradesh Government Press

Union of India v. Major S.P. Sharma

06 Mar 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; Chelameswar; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional power under Article 310 to terminate armed forces officers' services under the doctrine of pleasure, limiting judicial review to cases of patent malafides, and reversed the High Court's quashing of termination orders for lack of material evidence.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of pleasure Article 310 Constitution Army Act Section 18 termination of service

High Court of Madras by Registrar General v. P. Rathiram & Ors.

05 Mar 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that judicial review of High Court judge appointments is limited to eligibility and effective consultation, excluding suitability, and dismissed writ petitions challenging recommendations on grounds of suitability.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant judicial appointments collegium system judicial review eligibility vs suitability

Sushil Ansal v. State Through CBI

05 Mar 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for criminal negligence against Uphaar Cinema owners, management, DVB employees, and officials for the 1997 fire tragedy caused by safety violations and obstructed exits leading to 59 deaths.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant fire safety criminal negligence public safety structural deviations

Central Bank of India v. N.R.C. Limited

05 Mar 2014 · H.L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court allowed the contempt petition and upheld the eviction of N.R.C. Ltd. from public premises, holding that the Public Premises Act applies and the respondent’s failure to comply with Court orders warranted enforcement.

civil petition_allowed Significant Public Premises Act Maharashtra Rent Control Act eviction contempt of court

Neeta Lalit Kumar Sanghavi v. Dharamdas V. Sanghavi

04 Mar 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that after termination of arbitral proceedings, an application under Section 11 for appointment of arbitrator is not maintainable, and disputes regarding termination of the arbitrator's mandate must be decided by the appropriate civil court under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 14(2) Section 32

Ashok Debbarma v. State of Tripura

04 Mar 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for a brutal group attack but commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment, emphasizing reliable eyewitness identification, mitigating factors including residual doubt, and the necessity of special reasons for capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty rarest of rare case identification evidence Section 161 CrPC

Panchraj Tiwari v. M. P. State Electricity Board

04 Mar 2014 · H. L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that employees absorbed after merger cannot be permanently denied promotion and must be placed equitably in seniority and promotion lists, upholding their constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 16.

labor appeal_allowed Significant merger absorption promotion seniority

C.B.I. v. Karimullah Osan Khan

04 Mar 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that the trial court must allow alteration and addition of charges under Section 216 CrPC before judgment if supported by material and not prejudicial, setting aside the rejection of CBI's application in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blast case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 216 CrPC alteration of charges TADA Act criminal conspiracy

Rupak Kumar v. State of Bihar & Anr.

04 Mar 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that storing adulterated food not intended for sale does not attract penal liability under Section 16(1)(a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, quashing prosecution against a jail superintendent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Section 16(1)(a) storage for sale adulterated food

State Bank of Patiala v. Ram Niwas Bansal

03 Mar 2014 · H. L. Gokhale; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that dismissal orders cannot be retrospective, disciplinary proceedings may continue post-superannuation, and back wages are payable only till superannuation, not beyond.

labor appeal_allowed Significant retrospective dismissal superannuation disciplinary proceedings back wages

Union of India v. M/s. Concrete Products & Const. Co. Etc.

03 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that contractual lien clauses barring interest prevent awarding interest on withheld payments before the arbitral award and deposit in Court, allowing interest only from award date until deposit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration interest on withheld amounts contractual lien Clause 2401

Phula Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

03 Mar 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of a public servant for corruption, emphasizing the accused's duty to explain incriminating evidence and the limited scope of appellate interference with acquittals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 313 Cr.P.C. adverse inference appellate interference

Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal v. Jagdish Chandra Singh Bora & Anr.

03 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that the 2003 Rules granting bonus marks to trained apprentices do not apply retrospectively to a recruitment process governed by the expired 2001 Rules, and set aside the High Court's direction to revise the merit list accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Uttaranchal Subordinate Engineering Service Rules 2001 Uttaranchal Subordinate Engineering Service Amendment Rules 2003 trained apprentices bonus marks

Union of India v. Rafique Shaikh Bhikan

28 Feb 2014 · Aftab Alam

The Supreme Court approved a five-year Government Hajj Policy balancing interests of pilgrims and private tour operators, upheld the lifetime restriction on Hajj through the Haj Committee, and mandated reforms in process, accommodation, and grievance redressal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Hajj Policy Private Tour Operators Government quota Time-bound process

Nisha Devi v. State of H.P. & Ors.

28 Feb 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that the principle of audi alteram partem was violated when the High Court accepted a unilateral revenue report without hearing the appellant, setting aside her appointment and remanding the matter for fresh consideration with a fair hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant audi alteram partem Anganwadi Worker appointment opportunity of hearing revenue records

CBI, ACB, Mumbai v. Narendra Lal Jain & Ors.

28 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings against accused who had settled civil liability by consent decree, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process despite non-compoundable offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings Section 120-B IPC Section 420 IPC

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II v. M/s. Super Synotex (India) Ltd.

28 Feb 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that for excise valuation, only sales tax actually paid to the State Government can be deducted from transaction value, limiting incentive scheme benefits and remitting matters for reassessment accordingly.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 assessable value sales tax deduction incentive scheme

State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand

28 Feb 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused due to non-compliance with mandatory individual communication of rights under Section 50(1) of the NDPS Act, vitiating the search and conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Search and seizure Individual communication Right to be searched

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Anil Shantaram Khoje

28 Feb 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that publication of recruitment rules in the Official Gazette is mandatory for their operation, invalidating promotions made prior to such publication but protecting vested benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Recruitment Rules Official Gazette publication Promotion to Deputy Municipal Commissioner