Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Tara Singh v. State thr. Home Secretary, Uttarakhand

25 Feb 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and validated investigation by a Patwari despite the accused not being named in the FIR.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC murder conviction investigation by Patwari

Common Cause v. Union of India

25 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court referred the issue of the right to die with dignity, living wills, and euthanasia to a Constitution Bench for authoritative guidelines, recognizing the right to die with dignity under Article 21 but leaving euthanasia regulation to the legislature.

constitutional other Significant right to die with dignity Article 21 living will passive euthanasia

Birbal v. Haryana State

25 Feb 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to purchase government land in unauthorized possession by paying the assessed sale price in installments, directing decree in his favor upon compliance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession government land auction Article 142 Constitution of India

Nesar Ahmed v. State of Jharkhand

25 Feb 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Jharkhand's recruitment rules prescribing limited age relaxation for trained teachers and dismissed petitions seeking total age relaxation and parity with Bihar teachers post-bifurcation.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant trained teachers age relaxation Jharkhand Primary School Appointment Rules, 2002 Ram Vinay Kumar case

Nand Kumar v. State of Bihar

25 Feb 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that daily wage employees without regular appointments are not entitled to absorption or regularisation under the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006, affirming that regularisation must follow proper recruitment procedures and cannot be claimed merely by long service or pay parity.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant daily wage employees regularisation absorption Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006

Shyamal Saha & Anr. v. State of West Bengal

24 Feb 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in overturning the Trial Court's acquittal in a circumstantial evidence case without sufficient grounds, restoring the acquittal of the appellants.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal circumstantial evidence last seen theory High Court interference

M.D., Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. v. N. Ismail

21 Feb 2014 · A.K. Patnaik; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to resume lands for the Chennai Metro Rail Project subject to compensation for buildings, reversing the High Court's exclusion of the lands from the project area.

property appeal_allowed Significant land resumption public purpose leasehold rights Chennai Metro Rail Project

Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai v. Thiru R. Govindaswamy & Ors.

21 Feb 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that part-time employees not appointed through regular recruitment against sanctioned posts have no legal right to regularisation, allowing the appeal against the High Court's direction to regularise such employees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant regularisation part-time employees constitutional scheme Articles 14 and 16

Syed Gulzar Hussain & Others v. Dewan Syed Ale Rasul Ali Khan & Others

20 Feb 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's equitable scheme regulating the collection and sharing of offerings at the Ajmer Durgah, emphasizing transparency and statutory authority pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Nazrana Holy Shrine Dewan Khadims

Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

20 Feb 2014 · H. L. Dattu; S. A. Bobde
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's conviction holding that strangulation with a telephone wire causing injury constitutes attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC and that trespass into a union office with intent to assault attracts Section 452 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Section 452 IPC House trespass

Anil @ Anthony Arikswamy Joseph v. State of Maharashtra

20 Feb 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for brutal sexual assault and murder of a minor boy, commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with additional term, emphasizing reliable DNA evidence and the rarest of rare doctrine.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder death sentence rarest of rare Section 302 IPC

P. L. Tatwal v. State of Madhya Pradesh

19 Feb 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act must be granted by the authority competent to remove the public servant, and remitted the matter for inquiry into the validity of the sanction granted by the Standing Committee.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19 sanction competent authority sanction for prosecution

Amarendra Kumar Mohapatra & Ors. v. State of Orissa & Ors.

19 Feb 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Orissa Validation Act regularising ad hoc Stipendiary Engineers as Assistant Engineers while directing equitable consideration for similarly situated degree holder Junior Engineers, clarifying the scope of legislative regularisation under Articles 14 and 16.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Validation Act Regularisation Ad hoc appointment Articles 14 and 16

Rajasthan v. M/s. Binani Cements Ltd. & Anr.

19 Feb 2014 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that the specific provision limiting sales tax exemption for new cement units prevails over general provisions for Prestigious Units, restricting the respondent's exemption to 25% under the Scheme.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme, 1989 fixed capital investment new cement unit prestigious unit

Shabnam Hashmi v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that adoption under the Juvenile Justice Act is an optional secular process and the right to adopt is not a fundamental right under Article 21, emphasizing respect for personal laws and judicial restraint.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant adoption fundamental rights Article 21 Juvenile Justice Act, 2000

Polamrasetti Manikyam v. Teegala Venkata Ramayya

19 Feb 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that under Section 37 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees Act, court fee for cancellation of a sale deed must be paid on the sale consideration mentioned in the deed, not on the market value of the property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 37 Andhra Pradesh Court Fees Act court fee valuation cancellation of sale deed market value vs sale consideration

Maya Devi v. Lalta Prasad

19 Feb 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide registered General Power of Attorney executed before the Suraj Lamp judgment confers ownership rights and protected the appellant's property from execution of a collusive ex parte decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant General Power of Attorney Order 21 Rule 58 CPC execution proceedings collusive decree

Pooja Bhatia v. Vishnu Narain Shivpuri

19 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to an accused in an acid attack case due to his post-bail intimidation and misuse of liberty, emphasizing strict grounds for bail cancellation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation acid attack intimidation misuse of liberty

V. Sriharan @ Murugan v. Union of India

18 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court commuted death sentences to life imprisonment due to inordinate delay of over 11 years in disposal of mercy petitions, holding such delay violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 21 death sentence mercy petition delay in execution

Rameshchandra Ambalal Joshi v. The State of Gujarat and Anr.

18 Feb 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that a cheque presented on the last day of the six-month period from its date of drawing is within limitation under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the appeal against prosecution for cheque dishonour.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Limitation period Calculation of six months