Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Brijesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

24 Mar 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a delay of over 10 years in filing an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and the requirement of sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54

J. Rajiv Subramaniyan & Anr. v. M/s. Pandiyas & Ors.

14 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a private treaty sale of secured assets without a written agreement and in violation of SARFAESI Act procedural rules is null and void, setting aside the sale and restoring possession to the borrowers.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act, 2002 Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 private treaty sale secured assets

Biswanath Ghosh and Others v. Gobinda Ghosh Alias Gobindha Chandra Ghosh and Others

14 Mar 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court restored the decree for specific performance by holding that readiness and willingness need not be pleaded in exact terms if evident from facts, and that the High Court erred in dismissing the suit and entertaining the second appeal without formulating substantial questions of law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness amendment of plaint limitation

Phanidhar Kalita v. Saraswati Devi & Anr.

14 Mar 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, declared the appellant's title, and remanded the suit for fresh adjudication on possession and injunction reliefs based on proper evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant title suit recovery of possession permanent injunction Amin Commissioner report

Kesharbai @ Pushpabai Eknathrao Nalawade v. Tarabai Prabhakarrao Nalawade

14 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that after a proved complete partition, the burden lies on the party alleging jointness to prove it, and confirmed that the Nageshwarwadi property was self-acquired, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for its partition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition joint family property self-acquired property burden of proof

State of Punjab and Others v. Dhanjit Singh Sandhu

14 Mar 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Dr. B.S. Chauhan

The Supreme Court held that a party who accepts and pays extension fees under allotment terms cannot later repudiate liability, setting aside the High Court’s order refunding excess fees.

property appeal_allowed Significant extension fee Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 doctrine of approbate and reprobate equitable estoppel

Bhagwan Tukaram Dange v. State of Maharashtra

13 Mar 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on consistent dying declarations and held that intoxication does not negate intention to kill, while directing consideration of premature release under remission guidelines.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration intoxication murder Section 302 IPC

Kanhaiya Lal v. State of Rajasthan

13 Mar 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to insufficient circumstantial evidence, emphasizing that the 'last seen' theory alone cannot sustain conviction without a complete chain of incriminating facts.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Sudipta Lenka v. State of Odisha

12 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court declined to transfer investigation to CBI after chargesheet filing, directing completion of local probe and administrative inquiry into official lapses in the death of a sexual harassment victim.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 21 sexual harassment dying declaration transfer of investigation

Phatu Rochiram Mulchandani v. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board

12 Mar 2014 · S.S. Nijjar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful termination of lease and resumption of industrial plots by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board during company liquidation, clarifying the scope of Section 537 of the Companies Act and affirming the appellant's locus standi to challenge such orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease-cum-sale agreement Company liquidation Section 537 Companies Act Official Liquidator duties

Jumni and Others v. State of Haryana; Prem Nath and Another v. State of Haryana

12 Mar 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted two appellants based on credible alibi evidence and held that a dying declaration implicating multiple accused cannot be severed unless roles are distinctly separable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration alibi Section 302 IPC burden of proof

Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Mar 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; M.Y. Eqbal; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that existing laws sufficiently address hate speech and declined to legislate or issue unimplementable directions, directing the Law Commission to recommend reforms.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant hate speech fundamental rights Article 32 judicial activism

Commissioner of Income Tax - III v. M/s. Calcutta Knitwears, Ludhiana

12 Mar 2014 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the assessing officer may record satisfaction under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act before, during, or immediately after assessment proceedings under Section 158BC, and remanded the cases for fresh consideration accordingly.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 158BD Section 158BC satisfaction note

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union Of India

12 Mar 2014 · A.K. Patnaik; Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim...

The Supreme Court directed the release of compensatory afforestation funds from Ad-hoc CAMPA to State CAMPAs with strict conditions, reinforcing the State's duty under the doctrine of public trust and Article 21 to protect forests and environment.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Compensatory Afforestation Fund CAMPA Forest Conservation Doctrine of Public Trust

Dineshan K.K. v. R.K. Singh

11 Mar 2014 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that contempt petitions for disobedience of High Court orders merged with its own dismissal order should be filed before the High Court, not the Supreme Court.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition merger of judgments High Court directions Supreme Court jurisdiction

K.V.S.RAO v. C.B.I. & Ors.

10 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court allowed transfer of multiple similar criminal cases to a single court in Delhi for consolidated trial in the interest of justice and convenience.

criminal appeal_allowed transfer of cases criminal trial consolidation of cases interest of justice

Meera Devi & Anr. v. H.R.T.C. & Ors.

10 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that without cogent evidence of contributory negligence by the deceased, the full compensation awarded for a motor accident caused by the bus driver's negligence must be upheld.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 173 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

K. Gunavathi v. V. Sangeeth Kumar & Ors.

07 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that recruitment to vacant Computer Instructor posts must be made based on employment exchange seniority as per earlier orders and government policy, setting aside the High Court's direction for open competitive examination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Computer Instructors Employment Exchange Seniority Teachers Recruitment Board Recruitment Policy

Ranjit Kumar Bose v. Anannya Chowdhury

07 Mar 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that eviction disputes under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, are non-arbitrable and must be adjudicated exclusively by Civil Courts despite an arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement tenancy dispute eviction West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997

Malathi Das v. Suresh

07 Mar 2014 · P. SATHASIVAM; RANJAN GOGOI

The Supreme Court held that employees whose regularization claims attained finality before the Umadevi judgment must be regularized on the principle of parity, dismissing the State's appeal and directing compliance with earlier court orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularization of service contempt of court principle of parity Umadevi judgment