Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Safai Karamchari Andolan v. Union of India

27 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court directed full enforcement of laws prohibiting manual scavenging and mandated rehabilitation of affected persons, emphasizing constitutional rights and ending judicial monitoring.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant manual scavenging dry latrines Employment of Manual Scavengers Act 1993 Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers Act 2013

Mangat Ram v. State of Haryana

27 Mar 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of cruelty and abetment of suicide charges, holding that mere failure to keep wife at husband's posting and absence of dowry demand do not constitute offences under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC dowry demand abetment of suicide

State of Jharkhand v. M/S. LA Opala R.G. Ltd

27 Mar 2014 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that "glassware" is not covered under the term "types of glass" in a tax exemption notification, denying the benefit of reduced interstate sales tax to the manufacturer.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 tax exemption notification types of glass forms of glass

Vijay Dhanuka v. Najima Mamtaj

27 Mar 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate must mandatorily conduct an inquiry or direct investigation under Section 202 CrPC before issuing summons against accused residing beyond his territorial jurisdiction, and that examination under Section 200 CrPC satisfies this requirement.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 202 CrPC mandatory inquiry territorial jurisdiction summons issuance

Homi Rajvansh v. State of Maharashtra

27 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot quash criminal proceedings against one accused without impleading and hearing co-accused with interconnected roles, setting aside the quashing order and remitting the matter for fresh hearing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings principles of natural justice co-accused impleading

Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

27 Mar 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an accused who surrenders before the High Court is in its custody for the purpose of seeking regular bail under Section 439 CrPC, and the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain such bail applications notwithstanding the Magistrate's role under Section 167 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 439 CrPC custody surrender

Mohd. Haroon & Ors v. Union of India & Anr

26 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court monitored and directed comprehensive relief, rehabilitation, and impartial investigation measures following the 2013 Muzaffarnagar communal riots, emphasizing State accountability to protect fundamental rights and ensure justice.

criminal other Significant communal riots Muzaffarnagar Article 21 gang rape

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board v. Bishamber Dayal Goyal

26 Mar 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld consumer forum orders holding the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board liable for deficiency of service for failing to develop allotted market plots, granting proportionate relief to allottees.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant deficiency of service consumer protection statutory Board allotment of plots

Executive Director, Steel Authority of India v. Tycoon Traders

26 Mar 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that a contract to sell iron ore fines was frustrated and unenforceable due to statutory prohibition under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, directing refund of amounts paid.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant frustration of contract Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 38(v) public policy

Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. U.O.I. & Anr

26 Mar 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court directed immediate and effective implementation of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, mandating reservation for visually disabled persons in teaching posts to uphold their constitutional rights.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 reservation visually disabled fundamental rights

Western Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa Ltd v. M/s Baba Baijanath Roller and Flour Mill P. Ltd.

26 Mar 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that meter tampering cases fall outside Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, allowing the licensee to impose penal charges under the regulatory Code, and set aside the High Court's quashing of such charges.

civil appeal_allowed Significant meter tampering theft of electricity Section 26(6) Indian Electricity Act penal charges

Sheela Jawarlal Nagori v. Kantilal Nathmal Baldota

25 Mar 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

A landlord can maintain an eviction suit against a tenant even after an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 if possession has not been taken by the acquiring authority.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 16 Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 106

Vijay Singh & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

25 Mar 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court modified the appellants' murder conviction to grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC, holding that their injuries did not singly cause death.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 326 IPC Section 34 IPC cause of death

Savita v. Bindar Singh

25 Mar 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying principles of notional income, future prospects, and fair assessment of damages including loss of consortium and funeral expenses.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 166 compensation notional income

Soumik Sil v. Subhas Chandra Sil

25 Mar 2014 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s order rejecting the plaint for non-disclosure of cause of action after deletion of a plaintiff and compliance with a prior court order.

civil appeal_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 cause of action rejection of plaint trust property

Union of India v. Sheo Shambhu Giri

25 Mar 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent under Section 23 of the NDPS Act, holding that the offence requires proof of import, export, or transhipment connected thereto, which was absent.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 23 NDPS Act import export transhipment conviction under NDPS Act

Fahim Ahmad & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

25 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an insurance company cannot recover compensation paid from the tractor owner without proving breach of insurance policy conditions, as carrying sand for agricultural purposes does not constitute commercial use under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 insurance policy breach compensation liability tractor carrying sand

Jacinta De Silva v. Rosarinho Costa

25 Mar 2014 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that the Civil Court had jurisdiction to entertain a suit for ownership and eviction of a mundkarial house, dismissing the appeal against the High Court’s order allowing execution of the decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Civil Court jurisdiction Mundkarial rights Ownership and possession Execution proceedings

Mannalal Chamaria & Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

25 Mar 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must specifically allege that accused directors were responsible for the company's business, and dismissed the complaint against appellants for lack of such allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 complaint

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and Ors. v. Chhota Birsa Uranw

25 Mar 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Gyan Sudha Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the correction of an employee's date of birth based on authentic pre-employment documents over statutory service records, emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures and timely dispute raising.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant date of birth dispute service record correction Implementation Instruction No. 76 Mining Sardar Certificate