Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

KALPESH HEMANTBHAI SHAH v. MANHAR AUTO STORES

01 Apr 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact on landlord's bona fide requirement in eviction cases under Articles 226 and 227, restoring the appellate court's eviction order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India landlord-tenant dispute personal necessity bona fide requirement

Gowri v. Shanthi

31 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a settlement and sale deed conferring absolute ownership, dismissed inheritance claims of respondents, and allowed eviction of permissive occupants while leaving succession disputes for separate proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Deed Mandatory Injunction Possessory Rights Inheritance

Navneet Kaur v. State of NCT of Delhi

31 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; R. M. Lodha; H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukh...

The Supreme Court commuted Devender Pal Singh Bhullar's death sentence to life imprisonment due to unreasonable delay in mercy petition disposal and his severe mental illness, overruling prior distinction against TADA cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death sentence commutation mercy petition delay TADA

State of Bihar v. Rajmangal Ram

31 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that errors in the sanction to prosecute a public servant do not justify quashing criminal proceedings at an interlocutory stage unless failure of justice is demonstrated.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction to prosecute Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19 PC Act Section 465 CrPC

Reliance Industries Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India

31 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that in an international arbitration under the PSC, the Chief Justice has jurisdiction to appoint the third arbitrator who may be of any nationality, including neutral or Indian, and recognized the arbitration as involving all petitioners with the Operator entitled to act on their behalf.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) International commercial arbitration Third arbitrator appointment

Faseela M v. Munnerul Islam Madrasa Committee

31 Mar 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that eviction suits relating to waqf property fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts and not the Waqf Tribunal under the Waqf Act, 1995.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Waqf Act, 1995 Waqf Tribunal jurisdiction Eviction suit Civil court jurisdiction

P. Ramakrishnam Raju v. Union of India

31 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that ten years of practice as an advocate must be added to the judicial service of High Court Judges appointed from the Bar for pension purposes, ensuring equality and removing discrimination under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant High Court Judges Pension Article 217(2)(b) Advocate practice years

Ram Niranjan Roy v. State of Bihar and Ors.

31 Mar 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld summary punishment for contempt of court committed by a police officer who shouted at judges, tampered with court records, and filed false affidavits, emphasizing the need to maintain judicial dignity and authority.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant contempt of court contempt in the face of court Section 14 Contempt of Courts Act tampering with court records

Ramesh Vithal Patil v. State of Karnataka

31 Mar 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur · 2014 (2) SCALE 690
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of the husband for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, applying the presumption under Section 113-A of the Evidence Act and affirming the reversal of an acquittal where the trial court's view was perverse.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide dowry death Section 113-A Indian Evidence Act Section 306 IPC

In Re: Indian Woman v. State of West Bengal

28 Mar 2014 · P. SATHASIVAM; SHARAD ARVIND BOBDE; N.V. RAMANA

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of a gang-rape ordered by a village panchayat, directed strict adherence to procedural safeguards in investigation, condemned unlawful assemblies, and mandated enhanced compensation and rehabilitation for the victim.

criminal petition_allowed Significant gang-rape community panchayat inter-caste marriage FIR recording

Sanghian Pandian Rajkumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation

28 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court granted bail to two police officer appellants accused of serious offences after prolonged pre-trial detention, emphasizing judicial discretion, parity, and trial delay considerations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Article 21 prolonged custody serious offences

S.F. Engineer v. Metal Box India Ltd. and Anr.

28 Mar 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside eviction on unlawful subletting grounds, holding that delay and withholding of dues do not establish subletting without proof of parting with legal possession and consideration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful subletting Bombay Rent Act, 1947 Section 13(1)(e) parting with possession

Sakuma Exports Ltd. v. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A.

28 Mar 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge an international commercial arbitral award governed by English law with the seat of arbitration in England.

civil petition_dismissed Significant international commercial arbitration Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act jurisdiction seat of arbitration

Usha Bharti v. State of U.P.

28 Mar 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the No Confidence Motion provision under Section 28 of the U.P. Panchayat Act, affirming its consistency with Part IX of the Constitution and dismissing the appellant's challenge.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant No Confidence Motion Zila Panchayat Article 243N 73rd Constitutional Amendment

Bhule Ram v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Mar 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the compensation awarded for land acquisition in village Aali, Delhi, emphasizing that market value must be assessed based on the land's specific location and characteristics, rejecting claims equating it with adjacent villages without evidence.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value Section 23 compensation

AT PATNA v. SHYAM DEO SINGH

28 Mar 2014 · P. SATHASIVAM; RANJAN GOGOI; N.V. RAMANA

The Supreme Court held that refusal to extend a judicial officer's service beyond 58 years is subject to limited judicial review and affirmed the grant of extension where adverse remarks were uncommunicated and negated by subsequent promotions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant extension of service judicial officers Annual Confidential Report judicial review

Dr. Subramanian Swamy & Ors. v. Raju Thr. Member Juvenile

28 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, ruling that juveniles below 18 years must be tried under the Act irrespective of the offence's gravity, rejecting calls to try juveniles committing heinous crimes in regular criminal courts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Juvenile Justice Act juvenile offender minimum age of criminal responsibility heinous offences

B. Jayaraj v. State of A.P.

28 Mar 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused in a corruption case due to lack of proof of demand of bribe and held that mere possession of tainted currency without demand does not constitute an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence Section 13(1)(d)(i)(ii) Section 20 presumption

Narinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr.

27 Mar 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 0 · Cited by 23

The Supreme Court held that while offences under Section 307 IPC are generally serious and non-compoundable, the High Court may quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC if compromise between parties and prima facie evidence indicate remote chances of conviction and continuation would cause injustice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 307 IPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence

P.C. Mishra v. State (C.B.I.)

27 Mar 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a pardon granted by a Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 306 Cr.P.C. during investigation, affirming concurrent jurisdiction with the Special Judge and holding such pardon orders as curable irregularities if passed in good faith.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 306 Cr.P.C. Pardon to accomplice Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Special Judge jurisdiction