Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Gorkha Security Services v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

04 Aug 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that blacklisting requires a show cause notice specifically proposing blacklisting to satisfy natural justice, and quashed the blacklisting order for failure to do so.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant blacklisting show cause notice natural justice principles of natural justice

Babu Lal v. M/S Vijay Solvex Ltd.

04 Aug 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order vacating a temporary injunction in a partition suit involving companies and family settlement, holding that maintainability and merits cannot be decided at interlocutory stage and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant temporary injunction family settlement partition suit misjoinder

Precious Jewels & Anr. v. Varun Gems

04 Aug 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that defendants cannot be restrained from using their own names in business under Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and set aside the interim injunction against them.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 35 bona fide use use of own name

U.C. Raman v. P.T.A. Rahim

01 Aug 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that holding the office of Chairperson of the Kerala State Haj Committee, receiving only compensatory allowances, does not constitute an office of profit disqualifying a candidate under Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant office of profit Article 191(1)(a) disqualification Haj Committee Act, 2002

Ramesh v. State Through Inspector of Police

01 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape and murder of a child based on circumstantial evidence, confessional statement, and last seen theory, dismissing procedural irregularity claims.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape murder circumstantial evidence last seen theory

D.D. Tewari v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.

01 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that pension and gratuity are valuable rights attracting interest on delayed payment and directed payment of 9% interest on withheld retiral benefits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pension gratuity delayed payment interest on pension

Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra

01 Aug 2014 · VikramaJit Sen; T.S. Thakur

The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction for offences under Section 138 NI Act lies exclusively where the cheque is dishonoured by the drawee bank, overruling broader venue options and curbing forum shopping.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction dishonour of cheque drawee bank

Durga Burman (Roy) v. State of Sikkim

31 Jul 2014 · Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for murder and theft due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and unreliable recovery, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of evidence and independent proof when co-accused are acquitted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence common intention Section 302 IPC Section 380 IPC

Sanjay Gupta v. State of Uttar Pradesh

31 Jul 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside a flawed inquiry report on the Meerut fire tragedy for violation of natural justice, appointed a new Commission, and directed interim compensation to victims under Article 32 constitutional remedy for breach of fundamental rights.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 natural justice Article 32 Constitution Article 21 Constitution

Bairam Muralidhar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

31 Jul 2014 · Dipak Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld refusal to permit withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 CrPC in a corruption case, emphasizing the Public Prosecutor's duty to independently apply mind and the gravity of corruption offences in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 321 CrPC Withdrawal of prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act Public Prosecutor's duty

Secr., Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Grade-I DASS Officers’ Association

30 Jul 2014 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that financial upgradation under ACPS must conform to the existing promotional hierarchy and cannot exceed the next promotional grade's pay scale, upholding departmental clarifications and dismissing claims for higher pay scales.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation pay scale promotion hierarchy

Narinder Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

25 Jul 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, ruling that the presumption of illegal gratification applies once money is offered and that investigation irregularities did not vitiate the trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 12 offence Section 20(2) presumption authorized investigating officer

Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee v. Bannama

25 Jul 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that a sale deed executed by a person without title is void and the doctrine of feeding the grant by estoppel does not validate such transfer if the transferor never acquired interest during lifetime.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant stridhan property title dispute feeding the grant by estoppel Section 43 Transfer of Property Act

Rajeev Dhawan v. Gulshan Kumar Mahajan & Ors.

23 Jul 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Dipak...

The Supreme Court closed long-pending contempt proceedings against VHP leaders and media persons for scandalizing the Court due to procedural delays, advanced age, and unconditional apologies.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court scandalizing the court Article 129 Constitution Article 143 Constitution

Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Arun Shourie

23 Jul 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Dipak...

The Supreme Court held that a Commission of Inquiry headed by a sitting Supreme Court Judge is not a court for contempt purposes, and truth can be a valid defence in contempt proceedings, dismissing the contempt petitions against the editorial criticising the Commission.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 Supreme Court Judge as Commissioner Contempt of court

RAMDAS S/O KHELUNAIK v. KRISHNANAND S/O VISHNU NAIK

23 Jul 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's acquittal in a cheque bounce case, holding that the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Legally enforceable debt Burden of proof

Deva Ram v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr.

23 Jul 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and permitted compounding of the offence under Section 420 IPC based on the parties' compromise, acquitting the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 420 IPC compounding of offence cheating compromise

Somnath Chakraborty and Anr. v. Appollo Gleneagles Hospitals Ltd. & Ors.

23 Jul 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld appellants' ownership rights over disputed land and directed Appollo Hospitals to pay compensation, utilization charges, interest, and costs, affirming protection of property rights under Article 300A despite statutory acquisition claims.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 Article 300A compensation utilization charges

Saurabh Kumar v. Jailor, Koneila Jail & Anr.

22 Jul 2014 · N.V. Ramana; T.S. Thakur

The Supreme Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition holding that the petitioner was lawfully detained in judicial custody pursuant to valid remand orders and must seek bail through appropriate criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus judicial custody illegal detention remand order

Atul Tripathi v. State of U.P.

22 Jul 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that before granting post-conviction bail in serious offences, the appellate court must give the public prosecutor an opportunity to show cause in writing against bail, and non-compliance with this mandatory procedure invalidates the bail order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 389 CrPC post-conviction bail public prosecutor show cause in writing