Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

North Eastern Railway v. Tripple Engineering Works

13 Aug 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's appointment of a retired Chief Justice as arbitrator, affirming the Court's power under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to deviate from contractual arbitration appointment procedures in exceptional cases of delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Deviation from arbitration clause

Cochin Port Trust v. M/S Areebee Star Maritime Agencies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

13 Aug 2014 · R. K. Agrawal; Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court referred key questions on liability for port charges under the Major Port Trusts Act, including the roles of steamer agents and consignees, to a larger Bench for authoritative resolution.

administrative other Significant Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 Tariff Authority for Major Ports ground rent steamer agent liability

State of Gujarat v. Natvarlal Motilal Chavda

12 Aug 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling that an IAS officer's promotion cannot be withheld post Selection Committee approval merely due to subsequent charge-sheet or withdrawal of integrity certificate without following prescribed regulations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Administrative Service Appointment by Promotion Regulations 1955 Integrity certificate Selection Committee

Union of India v. Sanjeev V. Deshpande

12 Aug 2014 · R.M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that the absolute prohibition under Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act applies to all scheduled psychotropic substances regardless of their inclusion in the Rules, upheld stringent bail conditions under Section 37, and remitted pending cases for reconsideration accordingly.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8 prohibition Section 37 bail conditions psychotropic substances

Pawan Kumar Ralli v. Maninder Singh Narula

11 Aug 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that a handwritten communication can constitute valid notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and that courts must consider condonation of delay before quashing complaints on limitation grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 142 limitation

J.J. Irani v. State of Jharkhand

08 Aug 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that the complaint filed beyond three months from the Inspector's actual knowledge of the offence, acquired during preliminary investigation, is barred by limitation under Section 106 of the Factories Act, 1948.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 106 Factories Act limitation knowledge of commission of offence preliminary investigation Factories Act, 1948

Association v. Chief Secretary to Govt.

07 Aug 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that reservation benefits for Scheduled Castes in Puducherry must be extended to residents as per the Presidential Order, and the executive cannot restrict these benefits to Scheduled Castes of 'origins' by Government Orders.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes Presidential Order Article 341 Reservation benefits

Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Dwarka Prasad Koolwal

07 Aug 2014 · Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that employees were not entitled to any further opportunity to switch from the CPF Scheme to the Pension and GPF Schemes after the prescribed and administratively extended option periods had closed.

labor appeal_allowed Significant switch-over option Contributory Provident Fund Scheme Pension Scheme General Provident Fund Scheme

Shaileshbhai @ Pappu Balubhai Chunara v. State of Gujrat

07 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; S.A. Bobde
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld conviction based solely on consistent and credible dying declarations recorded after ensuring the deceased's fitness, dismissing the appeal challenging their reliability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC conviction consistency

State of M.P. v. Anees Khan

07 Aug 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that a workman who fails to enforce a reinstatement order or report for duty is not entitled to back wages beyond the order date, allowing the State's appeal but awarding a lump sum compensation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back wages reinstatement Labour Court abandonment of claim

Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India and Others

07 Aug 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that the Patna High Court had territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 as a part of the cause of action arose within Bihar, allowing the writ petition to be heard on merits.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 territorial jurisdiction cause of action writ petition

Sunil Kumar v. Vipin Kumar

07 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of bail to convicted respondents under Section 389 CrPC, emphasizing the need for recorded reasons and discretionary consideration of all relevant factors pending appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 389 CrPC bail pending appeal discretionary power recording reasons in writing

Ramaiah @ Rama v. State of Karnataka

07 Aug 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction for dowry death, reinstating the trial court's acquittal due to lack of proof of dowry demand and harassment and unjustified invocation of presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

State of Bihar v. Chandreshwar Pathak

07 Aug 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that appointments made without open advertisement and selection violate constitutional mandates and that termination of such illegal appointments, even after long service, is valid and lawful.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant backdoor appointment illegal appointment Articles 14 and 16 termination of service

Manzoor Ali Khan v. Union of India

06 Aug 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act but mandated expeditious and reasonable exercise of sanctioning power with a suggested time-limit to prevent misuse and delay in prosecuting corrupt public servants.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 19 Prevention of Corruption Act prior sanction prosecution of public servants constitutional validity

State of M.P. & Anr. v. Anshuman Shukla

06 Aug 2014 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to revision petitions under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, allowing condonation of delay and remanding the case for merits consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Limitation Act Section 19 Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam Revision petition

Hakkim v. State; Sarfudheen & Anr. v. State; Samsudheen v. State

06 Aug 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld murder convictions based on multiple weapons and common intention, while granting juvenile sentencing relief to one appellant who was a minor at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder common intention Section 302 IPC Section 109 IPC

Sree Mahesh Stationaries & Anr. v. Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd.

05 Aug 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that jurisdiction under Section 138 NI Act lies where the cheque is issued and dishonoured, not where statutory notices are issued, and transferred the complaint from Gurgaon to Bangalore.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act jurisdiction dishonour of cheque transfer petition

M/s Apex Distributors & Anr. v. M/s Timex Group India Ltd.

05 Aug 2014 · T.S. Thakur

The Supreme Court held that issuance of statutory notice from a place does not confer jurisdiction on that place's courts to try a cheque dishonour offence under Section 138, and transferred the case to the court at the place of dishonour.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act jurisdiction dishonour of cheque statutory notice

Mohinder Singh & Ors v. State of Haryana

05 Aug 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that a 25% deduction towards development charges is appropriate for land acquired within municipal limits, restoring higher compensation awarded by the Reference Court and setting aside the High Court's 40% deduction.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation development charges municipal limits