Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

M/S PARADEEP PHOSPHATE LTD. v. PARADEEP PHOSPHATE MAZDOOR UNION

26 Aug 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's notification abolishing contract labour in specified works of Paradeep Phosphate Ltd. and directed regularization of affected workers, dismissing the company's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 abolition of contract labour regularization of workers State Government notification

Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary & Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that the Central Government lacked legal authority to allocate coal blocks to private companies without following statutory procedures under the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 and the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, quashing such allocations made between 1993 and 2010.

administrative appeal_allowed Landmark coal block allocation Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 mining lease

BALWANT RAI SALUJA v. AIR INDIA LTD.

25 Aug 2014 · H.L. Dattu; R.K. Agrawal; Arun Mishra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that workers employed in statutory canteens through contractors are deemed employees of the principal employer only for the purposes of the Factories Act, 1948, and not for other employment benefits, dismissing the claim that they are regular employees of Air India.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant statutory canteen employer-employee relationship Factories Act, 1948 contract labour

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Penna Electricity Limited

25 Aug 2014 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1439
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Supreme Court held that power supplied by a gas turbine unit prior to combined cycle COD is firm power payable with fixed charges, aligning unapproved PPAs with regulatory tariff regulations under the Electricity Act, 2003.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Commercial Operation Date Electricity Act 2003 Fixed Charges

Pulsive Technologies P. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat

22 Aug 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that dishonour of cheque due to 'stop payment' instructions attracts offence under Section 138 NI Act and quashing of complaint on such ground is impermissible at the threshold.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act stop payment instructions dishonour of cheque quashing of complaint

Tolya v. State of M.P. & Another

22 Aug 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that allotment of surplus land under Section 35 of the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling Act confers Bhumiswami rights prohibiting transfer within ten years, rendering the sale deed null and void and restoring possession to the original allottees.

property appeal_allowed Significant Bhumiswami rights Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Land Holdings Act, 1960 Section 35 allotment illegal dispossession

Raju @ Devendra Choubey v. State of Chhattisgarh

21 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of three accused based on credible child eyewitness testimony and evidence but acquitted one accused due to lack of proof of participation or common intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder Section 302 IPC common intention conspiracy

M/s. Gira Enterprises v. Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad

21 Aug 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that customs duty valuation enhancement based on alleged comparable imports without supplying relevant evidence to the importer violates natural justice and set aside the enhanced assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs valuation Transaction value Customs Act, 1962 Customs Valuation Rules, 1988

Singh Ram v. Sheo Ram

21 Aug 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that in usufructuary mortgages, the right to redeem or recover possession accrues only upon payment or tender of mortgage money, and limitation runs from that date, not from the date of mortgage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant usufructuary mortgage right to redeem limitation period Transfer of Property Act Section 60

V. Sreeramachandra Avadhani v. Shaik Abdul Rahim & Anr.

21 Aug 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that under Muhammadan Law, a gift of the corpus of property is absolute and unconditional, invalidating conditions restricting alienation, thereby validating the sale of gifted property by the donee.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Muhammadan Law gift deed hiba corpus

Subhransu Sekhar Padhi v. Gunamani Swain

21 Aug 2014 · Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, properties of guarantors cannot be sold under Section 29 and such sales are illegal, affirming the High Court's quashing of the sale and directing refund to the purchaser.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Section 29 Section 31 guarantor property

Saraladevi & Ors. v. Divisional Manager, M/s Royal Sundaram Alliance Ins. Co. Ltd. & Anr.

20 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident claim, rejecting the High Court's reduction based on erroneous contributory negligence and improper deductions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation personal expenses deduction contributory negligence

SHIVGIRI ASSOCIATES & ORS. v. METSO MINERAL (INDIA) PVT.LTD.

20 Aug 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act lies where the cheque is dishonoured, not where the legal notice is sent, and set aside the jurisdiction of Gurgaon courts in favor of Bangalore.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction dishonoured cheque legal notice

Krishna Kumar Rastogi v. Sumitra Devi

20 Aug 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal holding that bona fide requirement of a shop for business by a family member is a valid ground for eviction under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act, overruling the tenant's objections and the High Court's dismissal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction landlord-tenant dispute Section 21(1)(a)

Kishore v. Binu N.

20 Aug 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a Co-operative Bank's appointment process for violating statutory rules and held that writ jurisdiction is maintainable despite alternative remedies under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Co-operative Society Kerala Co-operative Societies Act Section 69

The Life Insurance Corporation of India & Others v. S. Vanathi

14 Aug 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that courts have limited jurisdiction to interfere with the quantum of punishment in disciplinary proceedings and restored the original penalty imposed by the disciplinary authority, setting aside the High Court's modification.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry quantum of punishment judicial review Wednesbury principles

A. Francis v. The Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd.

13 Aug 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that an express condition in the posting order barring salary entitlement to a higher post precludes the employee from claiming higher salary despite discharging duties of that post.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant salary entitlement higher post Assistant Manager express condition

Purshottam Das Tandon LRS. v. Military Estate Officer & Ors.

13 Aug 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that entitlement to rent determined in an inter-pleader suit does not decide title, and writ petitions challenging ownership must be dismissed in favor of civil suit adjudication.

property appeal_dismissed Significant res judicata inter-pleader suit title dispute writ jurisdiction

Viman Vaman Awale v. Gangadhar Makhriya Charitable Trust & Ors.

13 Aug 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Seniority of a qualified teacher is determined from the date of initial appointment and continuous service, not from the date of acquiring a higher qualification, entitling the appellant to be appointed Headmistress over a junior teacher with earlier B.Ed. qualification.

labor appeal_allowed Significant seniority appointment private school teachers Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

Rakesh v. State of U.P.

13 Aug 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Ranjan Gogoi

A Magistrate can take cognizance and proceed on a protest petition even after accepting a police final report stating no case, as acceptance does not oust jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Magistrate jurisdiction final police report protest petition Section 173 CrPC