Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

S.E.B.I. v. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd

22 Jul 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Anil R. Dave; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court allowed Sahara to sell overseas hotel properties under strict conditions for compliance with bail orders but denied parole to Subrata Roy Sahara for lack of sufficient grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Sahara Group SEBI conditional bail sale of properties

Shyam Narain Pandey v. State of U.P.

22 Jul 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Kurian Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that stay of conviction under Section 389(1) CrPC is to be granted only in rare exceptional cases and mere loss of employment does not justify such relief, dismissing the appellant's plea to stay his life imprisonment conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant stay of conviction Section 389(1) CrPC life imprisonment exceptional circumstances

Yogendra Yadav & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.

21 Jul 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that while non-compoundable offences cannot be compounded, courts may quash proceedings or reduce sentences in genuine compromise cases under inherent powers to serve ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant compounding offences non-compoundable offences Section 482 CrPC compromise in criminal cases

G. Mohanasundaram v. R. Nanthagopal

21 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that withholding valid service records and dropping disciplinary charges without reasons vitiated the IAS promotion process and directed reconsideration of the appellant's promotion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Administrative Service Promotion Annual Confidential Report Validity of ACR

Union of India & Ors. v. Hitender Kumar Soni

21 Jul 2014 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that acceptance of resignation by the competent authority terminates a temporary Government servant's service immediately without requiring formal relieving, thereby dismissing the Respondent's claim for reinstatement.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant resignation acceptance temporary government servant relieving from duties Office Memorandum 11.2.1988

Hussein Ghadially v. State of Gujarat

18 Jul 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under TADA for failure to obtain mandatory prior approval from the District Superintendent of Police as required under Section 20-A(1), holding that such approval cannot be delegated and non-compliance vitiates the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act Section 20-A(1) mandatory approval District Superintendent of Police

Renikuntla Rajamma v. K. Sarwanamma

17 Jul 2014 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a gift of immovable property is valid under the Transfer of Property Act even if the donor reserves possession and enjoyment during her lifetime, and delivery of possession is not essential for validity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant gift deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 122 Section 123

Ajeet Seeds Ltd. v. K. Gopala Krishnaiah

16 Jul 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in complaints under Section 138 NI Act, it is not necessary to aver service of demand notice as service is presumed when sent by registered post, and quashing on this ground at the initial stage is improper.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act service of notice Section 27 General Clauses Act Section 114 Evidence Act

Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena

15 Jul 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda · 2013 (3) SCALE 561

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order granting maintenance from the date of application under Section 125 CrPC, emphasizing speedy disposal of family maintenance cases and the husband's duty to prevent destitution.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 CrPC Family Courts Act 1984 maintenance adjournments

Rajesh Valel Puthuvalil v. Inland Waterways Authority of India

15 Jul 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court’s valuation of building compensation in a land acquisition case, rejecting the High Court’s guess estimate reduction due to lack of rebuttal evidence.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation valuation report guess estimate

Rohtas Bhankhar & Others v. Union of India and Another

15 Jul 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Jagdish Singh Khehar; J. Chelameswar; A. K. Sik...

The Supreme Court held that constitutional provisions permit relaxation of qualifying marks for SC/ST candidates in promotion examinations, declared the 1997 withdrawal of such relaxation illegal, and directed restoration of reservation benefits.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 16(4A) Article 335 Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes

C.K. Dasegowda & Ors. v. State of Karnataka

15 Jul 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal by holding that the High Court erred in reversing it without sufficient evidence, reaffirming the principle that appellate courts should not disturb acquittals unless the decision is perverse.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal appellate court powers presumption of innocence Section 324 IPC

Kanta v. Tagore Heart Care & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd.

10 Jul 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that the appellant failed to prove medical negligence in the occurrence of aortic dissection during angiography, dismissing the appeal and affirming that medical complications alone do not establish negligence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence aortic dissection angiography res ipsa loquitur

M/S SHAHA RATANSI KHIMJI & SONS v. PROPOSED KUMBHAR SONS HOTEL P. LTD.

10 Jul 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that destruction of a leased building does not terminate tenancy if the land continues to exist, overruling prior inconsistent decisions and directing compensation for unlawful deprivation of tenancy rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant tenancy lease destruction of premises Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Easwari v. Parvathi

10 Jul 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's claim to property, ruling that the alleged marriage was not proved by credible evidence under the Hindu Marriage (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act and that the High Court rightly interfered in the second appeal due to perverse findings by the lower appellate court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant second appeal Section 100 CPC Hindu Marriage (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act valid marriage

State of Bihar v. Ashok Kumar Singh

09 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that the State of Bihar had jurisdiction to lodge FIR against an IAS officer for offences committed before Jharkhand's creation, but quashed the FIR due to procedural lapses in the vigilance inquiry.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant jurisdiction state bifurcation Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 vigilance inquiry

Khim Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

08 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the life conviction of Khim Singh for murdering his wife based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and his failure to explain his whereabouts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC murder blood-stained weapon

State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih

08 Jul 2014 · H. L. Dattu; R. K. Agrawal; Arun Kumar Mishra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that recovery of excess payments made to employees without fraud is permissible under law, distinguishing between equitable orders under Article 142 and binding precedents under Article 136 of the Constitution.

civil other Significant excess payment recovery pay fixation Article 136 Constitution Article 142 Constitution

State of Maharashtra v. Rajendra & Ors.

08 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for dowry death and cruelty under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC, setting aside acquittal except for abetment of suicide, emphasizing statutory presumptions and circumstantial evidence in dowry death cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC

Anil Gupta v. Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

07 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that prosecution of a company under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is a prerequisite for vicarious liability of its directors, and quashed proceedings against the director when the complaint against the company was barred.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 vicarious liability