Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

CHHEL SINGH v. M.G.B. GRAMIN BANK PALI

07 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that denial of opportunity to summon defense witnesses vitiated the disciplinary inquiry, quashed the removal order, and directed reinstatement of the employee with consequential benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry natural justice defense witnesses reinstatement

Shreenath Corp. v. Consumer Education & Research Society

07 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the National Commission's conditional interim stay order requiring pre-deposit of 50% of the awarded amount pending appeal, clarifying that pre-deposit for entertaining appeal is distinct from conditions for granting stay.

consumer appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 19 pre-deposit interim stay

Sobaran Singh v. State of M.P.

07 Jul 2014 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction due to delayed FIR, defective investigation, and unreliable ocular evidence, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC strangulation benefit of doubt delayed FIR

VISHWA LOCHAN MADAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

07 Jul 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that Dar-ul-Qazas and fatwas do not constitute parallel courts with legal enforceability under Indian law, cautioning against issuing fatwas affecting individual rights without consent.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Dar-ul-Qaza Fatwa All India Muslim Personal Law Board parallel judicial system

Dinesh Tiwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh

07 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Sessions Court may frame charges under Section 302 IPC based on strong suspicion even without a prior charge sheet or cognizance for that offence, and no separate hearing is required at the charge framing stage if the accused was heard at the discharge stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge Section 302 IPC Section 227 Cr.P.C. Section 228 Cr.P.C.

CHANDAN KUMAR BASU v. STATE OF BIHAR

07 Jul 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is required only if the accused is a public servant acting in discharge of official duties, and such sanction can be examined at any stage of trial, dismissing the appellant's challenge to prosecution without prior sanction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 197 CrPC public servant sanction for prosecution Indian Administrative Service

Kulai Ibrahim @ Ibrahim v. State

03 Jul 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that juvenility claims can be raised at any stage but must be supported by credible evidence, and directed investigation into alleged document forgery before deciding on the appellant's juvenility plea.

criminal other Significant juvenility claim juvenile justice Section 7-A J.J. Act age determination

Satti Paradesi Samadhi & Philliar Temple v. M. Sankuntala (D) Tr. Lrs.

03 Jul 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that limitation involving mixed questions of law and fact cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and restored the suit for trial on merits including limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation trust property Section 10 Limitation Act Order 14 Rule 2 CPC

Mannan Sk & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

03 Jul 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order allowing recall of the Investigating Officer under Section 311 CrPC to bring on record the deceased's statement, emphasizing the court's duty to ensure a just decision over procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 311 CrPC recall of witness dying declaration prosecution lacuna

Santosh Kumar Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

03 Jul 2014 · H.L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court commuted the appellant's death sentence to life imprisonment, affirming conviction but holding that the case did not meet the 'rarest of the rare' threshold for capital punishment.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant death penalty rarest of the rare Section 302 IPC mitigating circumstances

Arjun Jadav v. State of West Bengal

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Ranjana Prakash Desai · (2014) 7 SCC 417

The Supreme Court held that life imprisonment means imprisonment for the convict’s natural life unless remitted by competent authority, and no automatic right to release arises after 20 years or remission under state jail rules.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant life imprisonment remission premature release West Bengal Jail Code

Antonetto John D’Souza @ Johnny D'Souza v. Mrs. Aldila Braganza

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal setting aside the High Court's order remanding the matter to reopen proceedings, holding that the dispute had attained finality and grievances must be raised before competent authorities in accordance with law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Mamlatdar's Court Act alternate access easementary rights undertaking to withdraw

Davinder Singh v. State of Punjab

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304-B IPC, affirming that death by burns within seven years of marriage coupled with dowry harassment presumes culpability of husband and in-laws unless rebutted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act presumption of dowry death

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar

02 Jul 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court restricted automatic arrests under Section 498-A IPC and similar offences, mandating police to record reasons under Section 41 CrPC and Magistrates to judicially scrutinize arrests before authorizing detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act Section 41 CrPC Section 41A CrPC

Municipal Corporation, Gwalior v. Puran Singh Alias Puran Chand

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that mutation entries do not confer title, prior notice under Section 401 M.P. Municipality Act is mandatory, and dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for ownership against the Municipal Corporation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ownership possession municipal corporation prior notice

Mohammad Hafizullah v. Javed Akhtar

02 Jul 2014 · Anil R. Dave; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance in favor of purchasers after finding fraud in the sale of a co-owner's share to a third party without notice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance fraud sale of property co-owners

Pundappa Yankappa Pujari v. State of Karnataka

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming that reliable eyewitness and medical evidence can justify overturning an acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Acquittal Eyewitness testimony Boundary dispute

Suryakant Dadasaheb Bitale v. Dilip Bajrang Kale

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and reinstated the Sessions Court's acquittal of the accused in a dowry death case involving contradictory dying declarations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration revisional jurisdiction Section 397 Cr.P.C. Section 302 IPC

Pradeep Kumar v. State of Haryana

02 Jul 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC based on a reliable dying declaration and corroborative evidence of cruelty and harassment under Section 498-A IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death dying declaration Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC

McLeod Russel India Ltd. v. Reg. Provident Fund Commissioner, Jalpaiguri

02 Jul 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that both transferor and transferee employers are jointly and severally liable for damages under Section 14B of the EPF Act for defaults prior to transfer, dismissing the appellant's challenge to such liability.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14B Section 17B damages