Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

State of U.P. v. Pawan Kumar Divedi

02 Sep 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Jagdish Singh Khehar; J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri...

The Supreme Court affirmed that teachers of primary sections in recognized junior high schools in Uttar Pradesh are entitled to salary payments by the State under the 1978 Act, upholding the constitutional mandate for free education up to age 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Junior High School Primary Education Payment of Salaries Act Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act

Kamaljit Singh v. Sarabjit Singh

02 Sep 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a tenant admitting tenancy is estopped from denying landlord's title, enabling an NRI landlord to evict the tenant under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Land Restriction Act after five years of ownership.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 13-B East Punjab Urban Land Restriction Act Non-Resident Indian eviction petition landlord-tenant relationship

Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. v. Triveni Sharan Mishra

02 Sep 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that fixing a maximum educational qualification for a post violates Article 14 and that dismissal for suppression of higher qualification must be non-discriminatory, upholding reinstatement with a lesser penalty.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Article 14 maximum educational qualification discrimination disciplinary action

Abhay Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar

02 Sep 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that height beyond the minimum requirement cannot be the sole criterion for police constable selection and directed fresh appointments for candidates dismissed for height manipulation after four years of service.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant height criterion police constable selection Article 14 arbitrariness

JAI BHAGWAN GOEL DAL MILL & ORS. v. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

02 Sep 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the policy-based restriction limiting the appellant to one industrial plot, dismissing the appeal against the Delhi High Court's decision to require surrender of the second plot.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant relocation policy industrial plot allotment vested rights government policy revision

State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. v. Tilak Raj

01 Sep 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in granting higher pay scales to Laboratory Attendants without examining disputed facts, emphasizing that pay fixation is the domain of expert bodies and not suitable for writ jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant equal pay for equal work pay scale fixation writ jurisdiction disputed questions of fact

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. Tata Projects Ltd.

01 Sep 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that crane hire charges beyond the contractually specified milestone are recoverable and pre-Award interest is not payable under the contract and settled law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 crane hire charges pre-Award interest contract interpretation

Jessica Rehsi v. Chandigarh Administration

01 Sep 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's direction for out-of-time admission under the NRI quota, emphasizing strict adherence to admission schedules and denying relief to a candidate who delayed challenging eligibility criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant NRI quota admission schedule professional courses merit-based selection

Ashraf Kokkur v. K.V. Abdul Khader

29 Aug 2014 · Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an election petition alleging disqualification on the ground of holding an office of profit under Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution discloses a cause of action and cannot be dismissed at the threshold.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant office of profit Article 191(1)(a) election petition cause of action

Punjab State Electricity Board Now Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Goel

29 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court clarified that stoppage of increments without cumulative effect entails withholding increments during the punishment period without permanent loss, and cumulative withholding is incorrect implementation of such punishment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant stoppage of increments without cumulative effect with cumulative effect minor penalty

Ram Bahadur Pandey v. The State of Uttrakhand

29 Aug 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Uday Umesh Lalit

Termination of teachers in recognized schools without prior written approval of the Basic Shiksha Adhikari under Rule 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Recognized Basic Schools Rules, 1975 is illegal and warrants reinstatement without back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination of service recognized schools Basic Shiksha Adhikari Rule 11

Yerramma & Ors. v. G. Krishnamurthy & Anr.

28 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, held the bus driver solely negligent, and enhanced compensation based on gross income with 9% interest, setting aside contributory negligence against the deceased.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence loss of dependency gross income

Pangu Alias Apputty v. Narayani

28 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that the defendants perfected title by adverse possession and ouster, excluding the plaintiffs from partition of ancestral Streedhana properties, and restored the Trial Court's dismissal of the suit.

property appeal_allowed Significant Streedhana Adverse possession Partition deed Customary marriage

Manoj Narula v. Union of India

27 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; R. M. Lodha; C. J.; S. A. Bobde; Kurian Joseph
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that persons facing criminal charges can be appointed as Ministers unless disqualified by conviction under law, rejecting an implied constitutional bar on such appointments.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant criminalization of politics appointment of ministers Article 75 of Constitution Article 164 of Constitution

Surjit Singh & Ors. v. Gurwant Kaur & Ors.

27 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the appellate court erred in admitting additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC after the trial court and High Court had rejected the same, emphasizing judicial propriety and the limited scope of such discretion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance additional evidence Order XLI Rule 27 CPC Section 151 CPC

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Dilbahar Singh

27 Aug 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Dipak Misra; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph; S.A....

The Supreme Court clarified that under Rent Control Acts, the High Court's revisional jurisdiction does not permit reappreciation of evidence or acting as a second appellate court but allows interference only where findings of fact are perverse or illegal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant revisional jurisdiction High Court Rent Control Acts legality and propriety

Deny Bora v. State of Assam

27 Aug 2014 · Dipak Misra; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside a murder conviction based solely on a delayed and unreliable sole eyewitness testimony, emphasizing the need for credible evidence and examination of natural witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole eyewitness testimony non-examination of material witnesses reliability of witness delay in reporting

M/s. Navodaya Mass Entertainment Ltd. v. M/s. J.M. Combines

26 Aug 2014 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitration award and the High Court's judgment dismissing the appellant's challenge to payment dues under a valid business agreement, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed arbitration award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 contract enforceability minimum guaranteed amount

Balwan & Ors. v. State of Haryana

26 Aug 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld murder convictions based on credible injured eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, acquitting one accused due to lack of corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed (for Satbir Singh), appeal_dismissed (for others) Significant injured eyewitness testimony delay in FIR benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC

Ghanshyam Sharma v. Surendra Kumar Sharma

26 Aug 2014 · Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings for alleged criminal breach of trust and cheating, holding that the trial court must decide the question of entrustment and guilt based on evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 406 IPC Section 420 IPC Section 379 IPC Section 482 CrPC