Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

MAINUDDIN ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH v. VIJAY D. SALVI

06 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the drawer of a cheque drawn on his personal account is liable under Section 138 of the NI Act even if the company is not made a party, and awarded compensation and sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Drawer liability Personal capacity

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Anoop Singh

03 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused for offences against a minor, ruling that minor discrepancies in age documents do not invalidate them and that documentary evidence is paramount over medical opinion in age determination.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant age determination juvenile justice rules birth certificate ossification test

Basisth Narayan Yadav v. Kailash Rai and Ors

03 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court restored convictions under Section 304-B IPC against the husband and father-in-law for dowry death, emphasizing the presumption of guilt and burden on accused to explain death within seven years of marriage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 113B Evidence Act burden of proof

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Keshar Singh

03 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape case due to inherent inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and unreliable eyewitness testimony, emphasizing the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC minor witness medical evidence

Laxmi Devi v. State of Bihar & Ors.

03 Jul 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that even under the urgency provisions of Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the State must pass an Award under Section 11 and pay full compensation, and non-compliance with Section 11A entitles landowners to relief.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 17 urgency provisions Award under Section 11 Section 11A time limit

Surendra Kumar & Ors. v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that appointments made under a valid regularization policy are not illegal but declined retrospective regularization prior to the policy's existence, partially allowing the appeal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant regularization contractual employees Articles 14 and 16 retrospective effect

N K Rajendra Mohan v. Thirvamadi Rubber Co. Ltd

02 Jul 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Amitava Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's entitlement to fixity of tenure under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, dismissing the appellant's claim for eviction and arrears on the ground that the leasehold tenancy did not fall within the statutory exemptions for private forests or plantations.

property appeal_dismissed Significant fixity of tenure Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963 private forest plantation tenancy

Union of India v. M/S. Bright Power Projects (I) P. Ltd.

02 Jul 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral tribunal cannot award interest pendente lite when the contract expressly excludes payment of interest, setting aside the award of interest in this case.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award interest pendente lite contractual bar on interest Section 31(7) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

ZUARI CEMENT LTD. v. REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I.C. HYDERABAD & ORS.

02 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that only the appropriate government can grant exemption under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, and the ESI Court lacks jurisdiction to grant such exemption under Section 75(1)(g), dismissing the appellant's appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 exemption jurisdiction Employees Insurance Court

S.R. SUKUMAR v. S. SUNAAD RAGHURAM

02 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that cognizance under Section 200 Cr.P.C. occurs only upon judicial satisfaction of a prima facie case and allowed amendment of a criminal complaint before cognizance and issuance of summons to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant cognizance amendment of complaint Section 200 Cr.P.C. judicial mind

Daya Ram v. State of Haryana

02 Jul 2015 · Prafulla C Pant; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for double murder based on credible eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence, rejecting claims of delay and unreliability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder delay in FIR sole eyewitness

M/S ESSAR OIL LTD. v. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LTD.

02 Jul 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; VIKRAMAJIT SEN; PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE

The Supreme Court held that the sub-contractor's payment liability lies with the respondent contractor, not the principal ONGC, affirming the Arbitral Award and setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Privity of Contract Sub-contract Liability to pay

State of Rajasthan v. Mahendra Nath Sharma

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Abhay Manohar Sapre

Pre-2006 retired lecturers who completed three years in the selection scale are entitled to pension benefits corresponding to the higher pay band introduced post-2006, and the State cannot deny this on retrospective or financial grounds.

service appeal_dismissed Significant pension revision Lecturer Selection Scale pay band grade pay

Quantum Securities Pvt. Ltd. v. New Delhi Television Ltd.

01 Jul 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court directed the High Court to decide the pending interim injunction application on merits before proceeding with contempt proceedings, emphasizing timely disposal under Order XXXIX Rule 3A CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte injunction Order XXXIX Rule 3A contempt of court interim order

V. Krishnakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

01 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld medical negligence against government doctors and hospital for failing to screen a premature infant for ROP, enhanced compensation including future medical expenses adjusted for inflation, and affirmed vicarious liability of the State.

civil appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence Retinopathy of Prematurity premature infant compensation

The State of Tamil Nadu v. Mariya Anton Vijay

01 Jul 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the charge sheet under the Arms Act at the threshold and directed that the accused must face trial on merits.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Arms Act, 1959 Section 482 CrPC quashing of charge sheet prima facie case

Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board v. Indraprastha Gas Limited

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board has the power to fix transportation tariffs including network tariff and compression charges for city gas distribution networks but cannot fix or regulate the maximum retail price of natural gas sold by entities operating their own distribution networks.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 transportation tariff network tariff compression charges

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-IV v. M/s. Sandan Vikas (I) Ltd.

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; R.K. Agrawal; Prafulla C. Pant · 2003 (153) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that car air-conditioning kits excluding automotive gas compressors are classifiable under serial no. 8 and compressors under serial no. 1 of Notification No. 166/86-CE when sold separately, affirming the earlier decision and clarifying the interpretation of Explanation (2).

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Notification No. 166/86-CE car air-conditioning kit automotive gas compressor

State of J&K v. Wasim Ahmed Malik

01 Jul 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the admissibility of a confession recorded in Hindi under TADA, convicted the confessing accused, but confirmed acquittal of co-accused due to lack of corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant TADA Act Section 15 confession confession admissibility co-accused confession

Kamla Kant Dubey v. State of U.P.

01 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court reinstated the conviction and life sentences of two accused for the murder of a 90-year-old man, holding that the eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence was reliable despite minor discrepancies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder eyewitness testimony medical evidence Section 302 IPC