Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Vijay Mallya v. Enforcement Directorate, Min. of Finance

13 Jul 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that failure to comply with lawful summons under FERA constitutes an independent criminal offence punishable under Section 56, dismissing the appellant's plea for quashing despite departmental exoneration and repeal of the Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 40 FERA Section 56 FERA summons non-compliance

Om Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC based on admissible summary evidence and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence in a General Court Martial proceeding.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant General Court Martial Section 304 Part-II IPC Army Act 1950 Rule 23 Army Rules 1954

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Anand Mohan

09 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant · 2015 (1) SCALE 457
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Law Department was the competent authority to grant prior sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, overruling the High Court's quashing of such sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 competent authority delegation of power

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA v. SANKAR GHOSH & ORS.

08 Jul 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing regularization of casual workers engaged through a contractor and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of recruitment rules and fresh evidence.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization casual labourers promotional post Food Corporation of India

Nandkishore Lalbhai Mehta v. New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jul 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the decree of specific performance of a sale agreement, holding that conditions precedent benefiting both parties cannot be waived unilaterally and evidence outside pleadings is inadmissible without amendment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement for sale pleadings and issues waiver of contract condition

Riju Prasad Sarma v. State of Assam

07 Jul 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the limited scope of Section 25A of the Assam Act, affirmed the customary rights of the Bordeori Samaj and Dolois over Kamakhya Temple management, invalidated the Kamakhya Debutter Regulation, and dismissed challenges to the 2012 Rules and Dolois election.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Section 25A Assam Act 1959 Kamakhya Temple management Bordeori Samaj Dolois election

M/s. BHS Industries v. Export Credit Guarantee Corp. & Anr.

07 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the repudiation of an export credit insurance claim due to the insured's failure to declare all shipments and comply with policy terms, emphasizing strict adherence to insurance contract conditions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance policy declaration of shipments premium payment repudiation of claim

Chandra Babu @ Moses v. State Through Inspector of Police & Ors.

07 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate can direct further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC but cannot order reinvestigation by another agency, setting aside the High Court's contrary order and clarifying the scope of Magistrate's powers.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(8) CrPC further investigation reinvestigation Magistrate's powers

State of M.P v. Manish & Ors

06 Jul 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that serious non-compoundable offences under IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of an out-of-court settlement and directed the trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR out-of-court settlement non-compoundable offences

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Pan Asia Advisors Ltd. & Anr.

06 Jul 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court affirmed SEBI's jurisdiction to regulate and penalize Lead Managers for fraudulent transactions involving GDRs issued abroad that impact the Indian securities market.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI jurisdiction Global Depository Receipts Lead Manager liability Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act

ABC v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Jul 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an unwed mother who is the sole caregiver can be appointed guardian of her illegitimate child without mandatory notice to the putative father, prioritizing the child's welfare and the mother's privacy rights.

family appeal_allowed Significant guardianship unwed mother putative father Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Sirajul & Ors. v. The State of U.P. & Anr.

06 Jul 2015 · Chelameswar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court quashed a 16-year delayed criminal complaint under Section 307 IPC, holding that such delay violated the appellants' constitutional right to a speedy trial and amounted to abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 delay in prosecution abuse of process

Sh Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji v. State of Gujarat

06 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court clarified that judicial orders of civil courts are challengeable only under Article 227 and not by writ of certiorari under Article 226, and Letters Patent Appeals are maintainable only against orders passed under Article 226.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Article 227 Letters Patent Appeal Original Jurisdiction

MAINUDDIN ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH v. VIJAY D. SALVI

06 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the drawer of a cheque drawn on his personal account is liable under Section 138 of the NI Act even if the company is not made a party, and awarded compensation and sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Drawer liability Personal capacity

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Anoop Singh

03 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused for offences against a minor, ruling that minor discrepancies in age documents do not invalidate them and that documentary evidence is paramount over medical opinion in age determination.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant age determination juvenile justice rules birth certificate ossification test

Basisth Narayan Yadav v. Kailash Rai and Ors

03 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court restored convictions under Section 304-B IPC against the husband and father-in-law for dowry death, emphasizing the presumption of guilt and burden on accused to explain death within seven years of marriage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 113B Evidence Act burden of proof

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Keshar Singh

03 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape case due to inherent inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and unreliable eyewitness testimony, emphasizing the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC minor witness medical evidence

Laxmi Devi v. State of Bihar & Ors.

03 Jul 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that even under the urgency provisions of Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the State must pass an Award under Section 11 and pay full compensation, and non-compliance with Section 11A entitles landowners to relief.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 17 urgency provisions Award under Section 11 Section 11A time limit

Surendra Kumar & Ors. v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that appointments made under a valid regularization policy are not illegal but declined retrospective regularization prior to the policy's existence, partially allowing the appeal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant regularization contractual employees Articles 14 and 16 retrospective effect

N K Rajendra Mohan v. Thirvamadi Rubber Co. Ltd

02 Jul 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Amitava Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's entitlement to fixity of tenure under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, dismissing the appellant's claim for eviction and arrears on the ground that the leasehold tenancy did not fall within the statutory exemptions for private forests or plantations.

property appeal_dismissed Significant fixity of tenure Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963 private forest plantation tenancy