Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

MURAD ABDUL MULANI v. SALMA BABU SHAIKH & ORS

21 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed the Home Secretary of Maharashtra to examine allegations of deliberate investigative lapses by police officers and decide on departmental and criminal action, modifying the High Court's earlier directions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant police investigation deliberate inaction disciplinary action criminal prosecution

M/S. HCL LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

21 Jul 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the Risograph machine is a printing machine under sub-heading 8443.50 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, overruling its prior classification as a duplicating machine and allowing the appellant's appeal.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Risograph machine printing machinery duplicating machine

P.A.JOSE v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KOTTAYAM

15 Jul 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Arun Mishra; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that under Section 27A of The Wealth Tax Act, 1957, the High Court must frame a substantial question of law before deciding an appeal, and failure to do so warrants remand for fresh hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Section 27A substantial question of law High Court

Ravinder Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

15 Jul 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction but declined to interfere with the High Court's reduction of sentence to the period already undergone, while enhancing compensation to the victim's heirs.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304 Part II IPC sentence reduction compensation judicial discretion

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Maharani Ushadevi

15 Jul 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that disputes over property rights arising from pre-Constitution Covenants with Indian Rulers are barred by Article 363, dismissing the plaintiff’s suit for declaration of title and bhumiswami rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 363 Constitution of India Covenant Private property Bhumiswami rights

Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Science and Technology Trust v. Medical Council of India

15 Jul 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the Central Government must exercise discretion to consider applications for medical college establishment on merits despite delayed submission of essential documents, directing reconsideration of the petitioner's application.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10A Essentiality Certificate cut-off date

Kirpal Kaur v. Jitender Pal Singh & Ors.

14 Jul 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court reversed lower courts' dismissal of the appellant's claim, holding that the disputed property is joint family property and the appellant is entitled to a share, invalidating a gift deed executed pendente lite.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit joint family property self-acquired property gift deed

Vijay Mallya v. Enforcement Directorate, Min. of Finance

13 Jul 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that failure to comply with lawful summons under FERA constitutes an independent criminal offence punishable under Section 56, dismissing the appellant's plea for quashing despite departmental exoneration and repeal of the Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 40 FERA Section 56 FERA summons non-compliance

Om Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC based on admissible summary evidence and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence in a General Court Martial proceeding.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant General Court Martial Section 304 Part-II IPC Army Act 1950 Rule 23 Army Rules 1954

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Anand Mohan

09 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant · 2015 (1) SCALE 457
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Law Department was the competent authority to grant prior sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, overruling the High Court's quashing of such sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 competent authority delegation of power

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA v. SANKAR GHOSH & ORS.

08 Jul 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing regularization of casual workers engaged through a contractor and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of recruitment rules and fresh evidence.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization casual labourers promotional post Food Corporation of India

Nandkishore Lalbhai Mehta v. New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jul 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the decree of specific performance of a sale agreement, holding that conditions precedent benefiting both parties cannot be waived unilaterally and evidence outside pleadings is inadmissible without amendment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement for sale pleadings and issues waiver of contract condition

Riju Prasad Sarma v. State of Assam

07 Jul 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the limited scope of Section 25A of the Assam Act, affirmed the customary rights of the Bordeori Samaj and Dolois over Kamakhya Temple management, invalidated the Kamakhya Debutter Regulation, and dismissed challenges to the 2012 Rules and Dolois election.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Section 25A Assam Act 1959 Kamakhya Temple management Bordeori Samaj Dolois election

M/s. BHS Industries v. Export Credit Guarantee Corp. & Anr.

07 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the repudiation of an export credit insurance claim due to the insured's failure to declare all shipments and comply with policy terms, emphasizing strict adherence to insurance contract conditions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance policy declaration of shipments premium payment repudiation of claim

Chandra Babu @ Moses v. State Through Inspector of Police & Ors.

07 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate can direct further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC but cannot order reinvestigation by another agency, setting aside the High Court's contrary order and clarifying the scope of Magistrate's powers.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(8) CrPC further investigation reinvestigation Magistrate's powers

State of M.P v. Manish & Ors

06 Jul 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that serious non-compoundable offences under IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of an out-of-court settlement and directed the trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR out-of-court settlement non-compoundable offences

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Pan Asia Advisors Ltd. & Anr.

06 Jul 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court affirmed SEBI's jurisdiction to regulate and penalize Lead Managers for fraudulent transactions involving GDRs issued abroad that impact the Indian securities market.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI jurisdiction Global Depository Receipts Lead Manager liability Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act

ABC v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Jul 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that an unwed mother who is the sole caregiver can be appointed guardian of her illegitimate child without mandatory notice to the putative father, prioritizing the child's welfare and the mother's privacy rights.

family appeal_allowed Significant guardianship unwed mother putative father Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Sirajul & Ors. v. The State of U.P. & Anr.

06 Jul 2015 · Chelameswar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court quashed a 16-year delayed criminal complaint under Section 307 IPC, holding that such delay violated the appellants' constitutional right to a speedy trial and amounted to abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 delay in prosecution abuse of process

Sh Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji v. State of Gujarat

06 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court clarified that judicial orders of civil courts are challengeable only under Article 227 and not by writ of certiorari under Article 226, and Letters Patent Appeals are maintainable only against orders passed under Article 226.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Article 227 Letters Patent Appeal Original Jurisdiction