Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Harsarup Panwar v. State of Delhi through CBI

19 Aug 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld imprisonment sentences but conditionally reduced them upon payment of substantial sums for public health projects, considering appellants' age and health.

criminal sentence_modified Significant rigorous imprisonment sentence modification advanced age health conditions

Saroj Kumar v. Union of India

18 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that once adverse ACR entries are communicated and representation rejected, such entries cannot be ignored for promotion, dismissing the appellant's claim to treat them as uncommunicated.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Annual Confidential Report Promotion Communication of adverse entries Representation against ACR

Raj Bala v. State of Haryana

18 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the original sentence under Section 306 IPC, holding that judicial discretion in sentencing must be rational and proportionate, rejecting the High Court's reduction of sentence as unjustified.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide sentencing discretion proportionality in punishment

Selvaraj v. State of Karnataka

18 Aug 2015 · H.L. Dattu; Arun Mishra; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of the appellant in a bribery case, holding that the High Court erred in reversing acquittal without proper re-appreciation of evidence and that prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Section 5(1)(d) appeal against acquittal demand and acceptance of bribe

Ramvilas v. State of M.P.

18 Aug 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of Ramvilas and others based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite non-recovery of weapon, dismissing the appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC Eyewitness testimony Injured witnesses

M/S. SOORAJMULL NAGARMULL v. STATE OF BIHAR

17 Aug 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1981 lapsed due to failure to pass an Award within the statutory period, invalidated the acquisition, and directed fresh proceedings under the current law.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 11A Section 17 urgency provisions Award lapse

State of Kerala v. M.K. Jose

14 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is generally not the proper forum to adjudicate contractual disputes involving disputed facts and set aside the High Court's order quashing the termination of a public works contract.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction contract termination disputed questions of fact

Stantech Project Engg. Pvt. Ltd. v. Nicco Corporation Ltd.

13 Aug 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that concessions made by counsel regarding payment of admitted debts in winding-up proceedings are binding and set aside the High Court's order allowing the respondent to avoid payment, directing immediate discharge of dues with interest and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant winding-up petition Companies Act 1956 Section 434 concession by counsel

Sunil Khergade v. State of Maharashtra

13 Aug 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction and life sentence of the appellant who inflicted a fatal stab injury on an unarmed deceased, rejecting claims of private defense and lesser culpability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC private defense murder

Girishchandra Manubhai Patel v. Vedica Procon Private Limited & Others

13 Aug 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking joinder in a liquidation sale appeal, holding that the appellant's rights are protected by pending substantive proceedings before the Company Court and relief, if any, can be claimed from sale proceeds after adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Company liquidation Land ownership dispute Joinder of parties Sale of company property

State of Kerala v. S. Unnikrishnan Nair

13 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC due to absence of prima facie evidence of instigation or intentional aid by the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Section 107 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Vedica Procon Private Limited v. Balleshwar Greens Private Limited

13 Aug 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a confirmed judicial sale cannot be recalled merely due to subsequent higher bids or increased property value, upholding the finality of the sale in favor of the highest bidder accepted by the Company Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant judicial sale company liquidation confirmation of sale higher bid

K.K. GOHIL v. STATE OF GUJARAT

12 Aug 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that an employee completing nine years of service is entitled to higher pay scale even if the departmental examination was not conducted timely, and withdrawal of such benefit without hearing is unlawful.

civil appeal_allowed Significant higher grade pay scale departmental examination Government Resolution 1994 natural justice

KALYAN CHEMICALS v. GOVERNMENT OF A.P.

12 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective levy of an administrative fee on industrial alcohol as a valid regulatory fee within the State's legislative competence and dismissed the appellant's challenge.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant administrative fee industrial alcohol regulatory fees retrospective rule

D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

12 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; N.V. Ramana
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision denying concessional customs duty on an imported printing machine, affirming the High Court's jurisdiction to decide disputed factual issues in writ proceedings when invited by the appellant.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs duty Concessional rate Notification No. 114/80-CUS Article 226

M/S K.C.P. LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF A.P.

12 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh Rectified Spirits Rules except Rule 15, striking down the export permit fee as an unconstitutional tax beyond State legislative competence.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant industrial alcohol rectified spirit excise duty fee vs tax

S.M. ASIF v. VIRENDER KUMAR BAJAJ

12 Aug 2015 · T.S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that eviction cannot be decreed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC without trial where substantial disputed issues exist, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC eviction suit agreement of sale discretionary power

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Costal Gujarat Power Ltd.

11 Aug 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a mortgage deed executed in favor of a security trustee securing multiple distinct loans attracts aggregate stamp duty under Section 5 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 Section 5 stamp duty distinct matters

M.C.D. v. M/S. MEHRASONS JEWELLERS (P) LTD

11 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that post-1994 property tax assessments in Delhi must follow the 1994 bye-laws, and under the 2003 amendments, assessees with pending appeals or unfinalized assessments can opt for reassessment based on the new annual value method.

tax appeal_allowed Significant rateable value property tax Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1994 bye-laws

M/S FIBRE BOARDS (P) LTD. BANGALORE v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

11 Aug 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that advances paid towards purchase of assets within the prescribed period constitute utilization of capital gains under Section 54G, and the notification declaring Thane as an urban area continues to apply by virtue of Section 24 of the General Clauses Act, allowing exemption on capital gains.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 54G Income Tax Act capital gains exemption urban area notification General Clauses Act Section 24