Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

V.K. Mishra & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.

28 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for dowry death under Section 304B IPC based on consistent evidence of cruelty soon before death, clarified the limited use of police statements under Section 161 CrPC, and modified sentences considering custodial period and age of accused.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi v. M/s. Global Health Care Products

28 Jul 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of Close-Up Whitening as a dental cleaner under tariff sub-heading 3306.90, rejecting Revenue's claim that it was toothpaste under 3306.10, emphasizing adherence to Indian tariff entries over HSN Notes.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Tariff classification toothpaste vs dental cleaner HSN Notes essential character test

Bhanushali Housing Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Mangilal

24 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that a dispute arising from a single contract for sale of immovable property by non-members does not fall within Section 64 of the M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and dismissed the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 64 M.P. Cooperative Societies Act business of the society business transactions specific performance

Eshwarappa v. State of Karnataka

24 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and destruction of evidence but set aside the dowry harassment conviction due to lack of credible evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder strangulation circumstantial evidence dowry harassment

Shri Talukdar Singh v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd.

24 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal for proven misconduct but enhanced the compensation awarded to the terminated employee from Rs. 1,00,000/- to Rs. 5,00,000/- considering the disproportionality of punishment and the employee's service.

labor appeal_allowed Significant retrenchment compensation disproportionate punishment termination of service labor court

GIRIDHAR G. YADALAM v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX & ANR.

24 Jul 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that exemption from wealth tax on urban land applies only when a building is fully constructed with approval, rejecting the claim that land with buildings under construction is exempt.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Wealth Tax Act, 1957 urban land exemption clause construction of building

Nanjappa v. State of Karnataka

24 Jul 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that absence of valid sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act renders the trial court incompetent, quashing conviction and declining a fresh trial due to delay.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19 sanction validity of sanction cognizance of offence

Gurjant Singh v. State of Punjab

24 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a public servant for accepting bribe based on trap operation evidence but reduced the sentence from three to two years imprisonment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(2) Section 20 presumption

State of Maharashtra v. Shiva @ Shivaji Ramaji Sonawane; State of Maharashtra v. Mehmood Khan Yakub Khan Pathan

24 Jul 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused under MCOCA, holding that mere prior charge sheets are insufficient without proof of continuing unlawful activity after the Act's enactment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act Section 3 MCOCA continuing unlawful activity charge sheets

Rakhial Gram Panchayat v. Jagatsinh Adesinh Jhala

23 Jul 2015 · J. S. Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that a temporary employee unlawfully terminated is entitled to reinstatement and back wages only up to the cessation of the employment purpose, awarding a lump sum compensation of Rs. 1,00,000.

civil appeal_allowed Significant temporary employment unlawful termination back wages reinstatement

DM Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences v. Union of India

23 Jul 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that refusal to renew medical college permissions does not violate fundamental rights and writ petitions under Article 32 are not maintainable, directing petitioners to approach High Courts instead.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 32 Constitution of India Article 19(1)(g) fundamental right Medical Council of India renewal of permission

Darshan Singh Saini v. Sohan Singh

23 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that limitation under Section 468 CrPC is computed from the complaint filing date, upheld the High Court's initiation of proceedings under Section 323 IPC, and dismissed charges under the SC/ST Act due to absence of caste-based allegations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant limitation Section 468 CrPC cognizance Section 216 CrPC

Prabhu Dayal Khandelwal v. Chairman, U.P.S.C.

23 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports cannot be considered for promotion, directing reconsideration of the appellant's promotion based on communicated reports.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report Promotion Communication of ACR Article 14

Abhay Dharamshi Narottam v. Central Bureau of Investigation

23 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court maintained convictions of brokers and bank employees in financial conspiracy cases but modified their sentences to the period already served, while abating the appeal of a deceased appellant.

criminal sentence_modified Significant conviction sentence modification financial transactions conspiracy

Union of India v. Balwant Singh

22 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful discharge of a disciplined force member under Assam Rifles Act and internal regulations for repeated indiscipline, rejecting the High Court's order of reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Assam Rifles Act, 1941 Record of Office Instructions 1/2004 Red Ink entries Discharge from service

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhavnagar v. M/s Gujarat Maritime Board

22 Jul 2015 · A. K. Sikri; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that no service tax was payable on wharfage charges collected by Gujarat Maritime Board from a licensee since no taxable port service was rendered under the license agreement.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax port services wharfage charges Gujarat Maritime Board Act

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AURANGABAD v. M/S. GOODYEAR SOUTH ASIA TYRES PVT. LTD.

22 Jul 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman · 2015 (4) SCALE 631
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that mutuality of interest is essential to classify parties as related persons under Central Excise law, and absent such mutuality and predominant sales to related persons, valuation adjustments and duty demands cannot be sustained.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant related persons mutuality of interest Central Excise Act, 1944 valuation of goods

Robert John D’Souza v. Stephen V. Gomes

21 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging breach of trust and cheating by Society officials, holding that essential ingredients of offences were not made out and the prosecution was an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant entrustment criminal breach of trust cheating Section 406 IPC

Delhi Development Authority v. P.R. Samanta

21 Jul 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that in absence of unfair trade practice, the contractual interest rate on refund of registration amount cannot be enhanced by the Commission and set aside the order awarding higher interest and litigation costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 contractual interest rate refund of registration amount unfair trade practice

M/S. COASTAL PAPER LTD v. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE

21 Jul 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that waste gunny bags and jute waste do not constitute 'rags' under the excise Notification, entitling the appellant to concessional excise duty on paper manufactured from such pulp.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Notification No. 22/94-CE concessional excise duty non-conventional raw materials