Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

State of Kerala v. A.P. Mammikutty

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that luxury tax under the Kerala Building Tax Act must be levied on the aggregate plinth area of a multi-apartment building owned by a single person, rejecting the division of apartments for tax calculation.

tax appeal_allowed Significant luxury tax plinth area residential building Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975

National Institute of Technology v. Pannalal Choudhury

01 Jul 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a dismissal order passed by a delegated officer and subsequently ratified by the competent Board, affirming the principle of ratification in disciplinary proceedings under service rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings dismissal order Board of Governors ratification

State of M.P. v. Ashok & Others

01 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's acquittal of respondents in a murder by burning case, holding them liable as members of an unlawful assembly under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC based on dying declarations and eyewitness evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration unlawful assembly common intention Section 302 IPC

Deposit Insurance & Credit Guarantee Corporation v. Ragupathi Ragavan & Ors.

01 Jul 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the Deposit Insurance Corporation has a preferential right to recover amounts paid to depositors from bank liquidation proceeds before any further payments to depositors, setting aside the High Court's contrary directions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 Preferential right Official Liquidator Bank liquidation

Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia & Anr.

01 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that under the Copyright and Trade Marks Acts, a plaintiff may sue where it resides or carries on business, but if the principal place of business and cause of action are at one place, suits cannot be filed at branch offices elsewhere to harass defendants.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 62 Section 134

Chaitanya Prakash Audichya v. C.B.I.

01 Jul 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a public servant for accepting illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming the validity of the trap and evidence despite procedural challenges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 illegal gratification demand and acceptance trap and panchnama

Jagtar Singh v. State of Haryana

19 Jun 2015 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of Jagtar Singh for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC based on reliable eyewitness evidence and proven motive arising from a land dispute.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 304 Part II IPC motive in criminal law ocular evidence co-accused acquittal

SAHARA INDIA COMMERCIAL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. v. STATE GOVT. OF NOT OF DELHI & ANR

29 May 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:11141
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 468, and 120-B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offence cases upon compromise.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings non-compoundable offences compromise

Bijendra Bhagat v. State of Uttarakhand

29 May 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to insufficient evidence linking him to the fatal injuries, granting him benefit of doubt and setting aside his conviction under Sections 302/34, 324/34, and 452 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC common intention joint liability

Indra Dalal v. State of Haryana

29 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside conspiracy convictions as confessional statements made in police custody were inadmissible and prosecution failed to prove conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confessional statements Section 25 Indian Evidence Act Section 26 Indian Evidence Act conspiracy

Prem Singh v. State of Haryana

29 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder and molestation based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, recoveries at his instance, and reliable witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder sexual assault disclosure statement

Vikash College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

27 May 2015 · Vibhu Bakhrur · 2015:DHC:11050

The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing petitions challenging NCTE orders was not barred by laches due to Supreme Court directions, and directed reconsideration of applications under new regulations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Council for Teacher Education laches writ petition D.El.Ed course

Shabnam v. Union of India

27 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that death warrants issued immediately after dismissal of appeals violate Article 21 as convicts must be allowed to exhaust review and mercy petitions with procedural safeguards respecting human dignity before execution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant death penalty Article 21 right to life review petition

Sandeep and Anr. v. State of Haryana

26 May 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on consistent dying declarations recorded by a Magistrate and corroborative evidence in a dowry death case under Sections 304-B and 498A IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498A IPC

Prem Ram v. Managing Director, Uttarakhand Pey Jal & Nirman Nigam, Dehradun

15 May 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an illegally terminated daily-wager with over ten years of continuous service is entitled to regularization and retiral benefits on par with juniors who were regularized, regardless of classification differences.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization daily-wager work-charged employee illegal termination

Maharaji Educational Trust v. SGS Construction & Dev. P. Ltd.

15 May 2015 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde; Arun Mishra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to direct demarcation of mortgaged land in a writ petition and set aside the order declaring part of the land unencumbered, emphasizing proper forum and statutory limits of housing authority powers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction territorial jurisdiction demarcation of land mortgaged property

Canara Bank & Anr. v. M. Mahesh Kumar; Chairman and Managing Director Canara Bank & Ors. v. Santha & Anr.; Chairman and Managing Director Canara Bank & Ors. v. A.K. Sheeba & Anr.

15 May 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that dependants of deceased bank employees are entitled to compassionate appointments under the scheme in force at the time of death, rejecting retrospective application of later schemes abolishing such appointments.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment dying in harness scheme ex-gratia payment vesting of rights

Abdul Razak & Ors. v. State of Karnataka

15 May 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.K. Agrawal; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and destruction of original complaint, reinstating the Trial Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 Part II IPC Eyewitness credibility Destruction of evidence Benefit of doubt

K.L. Bakolia v. State through Director, C.B.I.

15 May 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act but reduced the sentence considering the appellant's age and delay in trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 13(2)

Ramanlal and Anr. v. State of Haryana; Bhagat Singh and Anr. v. State of Haryana

15 May 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that conviction under Section 149 IPC is unsustainable when less than five accused are convicted without evidence of other members, and reduced the murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC culpable homicide murder