Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Rahul Yadav v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that termination of a petrol pump dealership does not terminate the independent lease agreement in favor of Indian Oil Corporation, and the appellant must vacate the premises under the Public Premises Eviction Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease agreement dealership agreement Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 eviction

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Rajubhai Somabhai Bharwad

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that a Sarpanch cannot enter into a compromise on behalf of the Gram Panchayat without a resolution, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after setting aside the award based on an unauthorized compromise.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Gram Panchayat Sarpanch Compromise Authority

State of U.P. v. Satveer & Ors.

01 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of respondents in a murder case due to insufficient corroboration of sole eyewitness testimony and granted them benefit of doubt in a capital punishment trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sole eyewitness testimony last seen theory benefit of doubt capital punishment

State of Karnataka v. Sateesh & Others

01 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case, holding that doubts in prosecution evidence and procedural lapses warranted benefit of doubt and dismissal of the State's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal benefit of doubt eyewitness credibility FIR registration

State of M.P. v. Madanlal

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's laconic acquittal and sentence reduction in a rape case, emphasizing the mandatory thorough reappreciation of evidence by appellate courts and the non-compoundable nature of sexual offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC sexual assault non-compoundable offence appellate jurisdiction

OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

01 Jul 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

Payments by ONGC to foreign companies for services directly connected with mineral oil prospecting and extraction are taxable under Section 44BB, not as fees for technical services under Section 44D.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 44BB Section 44D fees for technical services

OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

01 Jul 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that exemption from surtax under notification No. GSR 307(E) applies only to foreign companies with direct participation agreements in mineral oil business, excluding service providers, and must be strictly interpreted.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 Section 24-AA exemption notification foreign companies

State of Kerala v. A.P. Mammikutty

01 Jul 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that luxury tax under the Kerala Building Tax Act must be levied on the aggregate plinth area of a multi-apartment building owned by a single person, rejecting the division of apartments for tax calculation.

tax appeal_allowed Significant luxury tax plinth area residential building Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975

National Institute of Technology v. Pannalal Choudhury

01 Jul 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a dismissal order passed by a delegated officer and subsequently ratified by the competent Board, affirming the principle of ratification in disciplinary proceedings under service rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings dismissal order Board of Governors ratification

State of M.P. v. Ashok & Others

01 Jul 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's acquittal of respondents in a murder by burning case, holding them liable as members of an unlawful assembly under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC based on dying declarations and eyewitness evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration unlawful assembly common intention Section 302 IPC

Deposit Insurance & Credit Guarantee Corporation v. Ragupathi Ragavan & Ors.

01 Jul 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the Deposit Insurance Corporation has a preferential right to recover amounts paid to depositors from bank liquidation proceeds before any further payments to depositors, setting aside the High Court's contrary directions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 Preferential right Official Liquidator Bank liquidation

Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia & Anr.

01 Jul 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the Copyright and Trade Marks Acts, a plaintiff may sue where it resides or carries on business, but if the principal place of business and cause of action are at one place, suits cannot be filed at branch offices elsewhere to harass defendants.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 62 Section 134

Chaitanya Prakash Audichya v. C.B.I.

01 Jul 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a public servant for accepting illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming the validity of the trap and evidence despite procedural challenges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 illegal gratification demand and acceptance trap and panchnama

Jagtar Singh v. State of Haryana

19 Jun 2015 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of Jagtar Singh for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC based on reliable eyewitness evidence and proven motive arising from a land dispute.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 304 Part II IPC motive in criminal law ocular evidence co-accused acquittal

Bijendra Bhagat v. State of Uttarakhand

29 May 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to insufficient evidence linking him to the fatal injuries, granting him benefit of doubt and setting aside his conviction under Sections 302/34, 324/34, and 452 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC common intention joint liability

Indra Dalal v. State of Haryana

29 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside conspiracy convictions as confessional statements made in police custody were inadmissible and prosecution failed to prove conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confessional statements Section 25 Indian Evidence Act Section 26 Indian Evidence Act conspiracy

Prem Singh v. State of Haryana

29 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder and molestation based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, recoveries at his instance, and reliable witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder sexual assault disclosure statement

Shabnam v. Union of India

27 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that death warrants issued immediately after dismissal of appeals violate Article 21 as convicts must be allowed to exhaust review and mercy petitions with procedural safeguards respecting human dignity before execution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant death penalty Article 21 right to life review petition

Sandeep and Anr. v. State of Haryana

26 May 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on consistent dying declarations recorded by a Magistrate and corroborative evidence in a dowry death case under Sections 304-B and 498A IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498A IPC

Prem Ram v. Managing Director, Uttarakhand Pey Jal & Nirman Nigam, Dehradun

15 May 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that an illegally terminated daily-wager with over ten years of continuous service is entitled to regularization and retiral benefits on par with juniors who were regularized, regardless of classification differences.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization daily-wager work-charged employee illegal termination